Share

Hodgson: National Exemption Orders should be scrapped

Door-to-door fundraising
News

Hodgson: National Exemption Orders should be scrapped

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 16 Jul 2012

National Exemption Orders, which are currently granted to some larger charities to let them carry out door-to-door collections without applying for new licences each time, are unfair and should be abolished, Lord Hodgson said.

Local authorities have complained that they are not always told by the NEO-holders when collections will take place so they can’t keep accurate records and therefore allocate the remaining slots to smaller, local charities. This causes resentment, said Lord Hodgson in his Charities Act review.

In addition, holders are increasingly entering into agreements with commercial organisations who carry out face-to-face or textile collections under the auspices of the charity's Exemption Order.

Lord Hodgson pointed out that NEOs were originally created for flagship occasions such as Poppy Day or Christian Aid Week, but their use has expanded and is now causing "unfairness and complexity in the system". As a result, he recommends they should be scrapped.

But Institute of Fundraising chief executive Peter Lewis warned that the 40 or so large charities with National Exemption Orders will be up in arms at this recommendation.

British Heart Foundation, Oxfam and British Red Cross will be among those affected.

He said: “The absolute proposal to abolish exemption holders needs to be looked at very carefully. We must ensure that the benefits outweigh any new costs or bureaucracy.

“We understand the desire to balance between large national charities - some of whom are NEO holders, some who aren’t - and smaller more local charities, however we are concerned that as is the proposal will mean far more bureaucracy for charities and local authorities alike. Lord Hodgson’s proposals will need careful and detailed examination.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Charity sector bodies 'disappointed' by HMRC decision on publishing tax statistics

28 Aug 2015

HM Revenue and Customs has decided to reduce how often it publishes statistics about charity tax reliefs,...

Action for Children's income falls for the third successive year

28 Aug 2015

Action for Children’s total income has fallen for the third year in a row, due to “volatile markets”...

81 per cent of small and medium charities ‘struggling’ to survive, says survey

27 Aug 2015

Just over 80 per cent of small and medium charities are struggling to obtain enough funding and a further...

Trustees were paid to review the Halo Trust following CEO's suspension

28 Aug 2015

Two trustees at the Halo Trust were paid a combined total of £120,000 to review the charity’s structural,...

Acevo’s membership increases for the first time in six years

27 Aug 2015

The Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations has reported that its membership is up...

NUS signs campaigning partnership with TUC

27 Aug 2015

The National Union of Students and Trades Union Congress have signed a partnership to run joint trade...

Facebook adds 'Donate Now' button

25 Aug 2015

Charities in the UK can now ask their supporters to give directly via Facebook, after the social media...

New website and tagline for Stonewall

21 Aug 2015

Equality charity Stonewall has today revealed its new website and has added the tagline “acceptance...

Royal British Legion launches new mobile compatible website

19 Aug 2015

The Royal British Legion has launched a new mobile-compatible website which it says will “encourage...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising