Share

Hodgson: National Exemption Orders should be scrapped

Door-to-door fundraising
News

Hodgson: National Exemption Orders should be scrapped

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 16 Jul 2012

National Exemption Orders, which are currently granted to some larger charities to let them carry out door-to-door collections without applying for new licences each time, are unfair and should be abolished, Lord Hodgson said.

Local authorities have complained that they are not always told by the NEO-holders when collections will take place so they can’t keep accurate records and therefore allocate the remaining slots to smaller, local charities. This causes resentment, said Lord Hodgson in his Charities Act review.

In addition, holders are increasingly entering into agreements with commercial organisations who carry out face-to-face or textile collections under the auspices of the charity's Exemption Order.

Lord Hodgson pointed out that NEOs were originally created for flagship occasions such as Poppy Day or Christian Aid Week, but their use has expanded and is now causing "unfairness and complexity in the system". As a result, he recommends they should be scrapped.

But Institute of Fundraising chief executive Peter Lewis warned that the 40 or so large charities with National Exemption Orders will be up in arms at this recommendation.

British Heart Foundation, Oxfam and British Red Cross will be among those affected.

He said: “The absolute proposal to abolish exemption holders needs to be looked at very carefully. We must ensure that the benefits outweigh any new costs or bureaucracy.

“We understand the desire to balance between large national charities - some of whom are NEO holders, some who aren’t - and smaller more local charities, however we are concerned that as is the proposal will mean far more bureaucracy for charities and local authorities alike. Lord Hodgson’s proposals will need careful and detailed examination.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Canal and River Trust sees hundredfold growth in volunteering hours

27 Jul 2016

The Canal and River Trust has seen volunteering rise almost a hundredfold since the start of the decade,...

Oxfam International to move headquarters to Nairobi

26 Jul 2016

Oxfam International has announced that it will move the Oxfam International Secretariat from Oxford, where...

JustGiving pays £1.6m reclaimed gift aid to thousands of charities after updated HMRC guidance

25 Jul 2016

Charities that lost out on gift aid payments because donations on JustGiving included messages of support...

Charity Commission to publish guidance on taking legal action

29 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission will soon publish new guidance for trustees about when to take or defend legal...

Foundations back inquiry into the future of civil society

29 Jul 2016

A group of charitable funders including the Baring Foundation, Barrow Cadbury Trust  and Lankelly...

Charitable funds used to buy night vision equipment for convicted terrorist

28 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission has removed a convicted terrorist as a trustee and transferred money he raised...

Blockchain technology could ‘revolutionise’ charity regulation, says report

21 Jul 2016

Blockchain technology could eventually be used to carry out many of the functions of a traditional regulator,...

Macmillan, Cancer Research UK and Brooke use Pokemon Go to encourage fundraising

14 Jul 2016

Macmillan Cancer Support, Cancer Research UK and Brooke are among the charities to encourage fundraising...

Stop looking for a 'big bang' moment for digital transformation

4 Jul 2016

Charities should stop looking for a “big bang” moment in digital transformation and instead focus...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising