Share

Hodgson: National Exemption Orders should be scrapped

Door-to-door fundraising
News

Hodgson: National Exemption Orders should be scrapped

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 16 Jul 2012

National Exemption Orders, which are currently granted to some larger charities to let them carry out door-to-door collections without applying for new licences each time, are unfair and should be abolished, Lord Hodgson said.

Local authorities have complained that they are not always told by the NEO-holders when collections will take place so they can’t keep accurate records and therefore allocate the remaining slots to smaller, local charities. This causes resentment, said Lord Hodgson in his Charities Act review.

In addition, holders are increasingly entering into agreements with commercial organisations who carry out face-to-face or textile collections under the auspices of the charity's Exemption Order.

Lord Hodgson pointed out that NEOs were originally created for flagship occasions such as Poppy Day or Christian Aid Week, but their use has expanded and is now causing "unfairness and complexity in the system". As a result, he recommends they should be scrapped.

But Institute of Fundraising chief executive Peter Lewis warned that the 40 or so large charities with National Exemption Orders will be up in arms at this recommendation.

British Heart Foundation, Oxfam and British Red Cross will be among those affected.

He said: “The absolute proposal to abolish exemption holders needs to be looked at very carefully. We must ensure that the benefits outweigh any new costs or bureaucracy.

“We understand the desire to balance between large national charities - some of whom are NEO holders, some who aren’t - and smaller more local charities, however we are concerned that as is the proposal will mean far more bureaucracy for charities and local authorities alike. Lord Hodgson’s proposals will need careful and detailed examination.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Society Network Foundation dismisses government's claim for grant refund

12 Sep 2014

The trustees of Society Network Foundation have rejected the Cabinet Office claim that the charity ought...

Dfid launches £150m fund for small and medium-sized charities

12 Sep 2014

The Department for International Development has launched a new fund, expected to be worth £150m over...

Shaw Trust income up 12 per cent but staff numbers down 11 per cent

12 Sep 2014

The Shaw Trust has seen a 12 per cent rise in its income, up to £107.8m, according to its 2013/14 annual...

Serco to end its involvement with the National Citizen Service

11 Sep 2014

Serco has not reapplied to deliver the volunteering programme the National Citizen Service, despite winning...

Electoral Commission's amendments to Lobbying Act guidelines 'a climbdown'

11 Sep 2014

The Electoral Commission has been forced into a climbdown over its guidance on the Lobbying Act, according...

Labour MPs are more supportive than Conservatives of charities challenging government policies

11 Sep 2014

Less than half of Conservative MPs believe charities should be able to challenge government policy, new...

Charities warned that digital campaigns can be 'counterproductive'

9 Sep 2014

Charity digital campaigns can be counterproductive and will need to change to keep the attention of those...

Twitter trials plans to allow users to donate to charity through its site

9 Sep 2014

Twitter has announced plans to allow users to donate to charity through the social media platform, as...

Fundraisers should engage more with older people online, new research shows

2 Sep 2014

Charities could be missing out on donations by not engaging with older people through online and mobile...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising