Share

Gambling Commission acted ‘impeccably’ in working with lawful Health Lottery, court hears

Royal Courts of Justice
News

Gambling Commission acted ‘impeccably’ in working with lawful Health Lottery, court hears

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 13 Jul 2012

The Gambling Commission has defended its decisions in dealing with the Health Lottery as “impeccable” in its response to a claim by the National Lottery operator for a judicial review of its actions.

The Gambling Commission yesterday got to respond to the case brought against it by Camelot over its decision not to have a wide-ranging review of the Health Lottery. Camelot is seeking a judicial review of the Gambling Commission’s actions.

James Goudie QC, acting for the Gambling Commission, confirmed that the Commission does have some ongoing concerns about the Health Lottery, but said it is addressing these in a review of the marketing and promotion of the scheme, and in ongoing dealings with the Health Lottery and the 51 societies which hire it as an external lottery manager.

Despite these concerns, the Gambling Commission does not consider the Health Lottery unlawful, he said. When it was proposed, the Commission judged that the Health Lottery scheme ran close to the borders of the law, but Goudie said the regulator was and is confident the scheme can operate in compliance with the law. As a result, he argued, the Commission was obliged to grant licences to the operator and community interest companies (CICs) and subsequently monitor how the scheme was rolled out.

“That’s an impeccable approach. The approach of the Commission has been impeccable throughout,” said Goudie.  

“These were matters that could only be monitored over time.”

Referring to communications between the Commission and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, revealed in court on Wednesday, Goudie said that the Commission had been acting within its responsibilities as regulator in informing the DCMS that it thought the scheme was legitimately utilising a “loophole” in legislation and that the DCMS or Secretary of State might want to introduce some certainty into the law.

Goudie said the fact that it had brought the loophole to the attention of the Department demonstrates that the Commission had always viewed the Health Lottery as operating legally. “There is only a loophole if one believes the scheme is lawful,” he said.

Goudie dismissed Camelot’s position, represented by Lord Pannick QC in the hearing on Wednesday, that the scheme is undermined by the fact that the 51 societies were set up with a view to creating to the Health Lottery. Goudie argued that the critical point is that those CICs were themselves not established for non-commercial purpose and that they benefit their local communities.

“The proof of the pudding is in the eating, because [the Health Lottery] has raised millions of pounds for good causes up and down the country,” said Goudie.

“It would be a tragedy if that would be terminated.”

Earlier this month the Health Lottery announced that it had raised £20m for good causes since launching in October 2011.

Goudie said that the Gambling Commission was surprised at how the Health Lottery was presented at its launch last year, and immediately “hauled” in the Health Lottery and the CICs involved. Since that point however, he said, “it is a story of constant and continuing progress”.  In particular he said the Commission was pleased with moves by the CICs to develop a stronger presence in their regions.

“The Commission remains more concerned at this point about the way the scheme is being marketed,” he said. “There has been good progress, but not enough.”

The Gambling Commission last month announced a review into the marketing and promotion of the Health Lottery, but Goudie said it has not ceased monitoring the operation as a whole nor discounted the idea of holding another review into the licences in the future.

Goudie added, however, that there was no specific time frame in which the Commission was obliged to conduct a licence review should it feel one is necessary, and added that it was right for the Commission to consider things such as its own capacity, the difficulty of the case and likelihood of success in deciding whether to take regulatory action against an operator.

Starting on Wednesday this has been a rolled-up hearing which means that should the judges decide that a judicial review is warranted, that review will take place immediately.

The Health Lottery and the 51 CICs are represented at the hearing as interested parties and are yet to have their own arguments heard by the court. The hearing continues.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Access Foundation to invest endowment in social investment

24 Aug 2016

Access: the Foundation for Social Investment has announced it will put its endowment from the Cabinet...

Charity investigated after it did not know its own income

23 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into a charity that underestimated its own annual income...

Charities ask Treasury for clarity on EU funding for the sector

22 Aug 2016

Charity representative bodies have written to the Treasury seeking assurances about European Union funding....

Charity Commission should ‘avoid the temptation to look tough’ when it starts disqualifying trustees

24 Aug 2016

Other infrastructure bodies have joined NCVO in raising concerns about how the Charity Commission might...

New Commission powers ‘threaten the independence of charities’, NCVO warns

23 Aug 2016

Some of the Charity Commission’s new powers “threaten the independence of charities”, NCVO has said...

Shaw Trust criticises Ofsted following ‘inadequate’ grading

23 Aug 2016

The Shaw Trust has criticised Ofsted following an investigation published earlier this month which described...

RSPCA ranked fourth in global charity social media brand index

19 Aug 2016

A new social media index has said that the RSPCA has the fourth best digital charity brand globally, with...

Charity Commission retracts story which indicated it would no longer publish all accounts

18 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has published a news story announcing it will no longer display documents received...

New versions of free online impact measurement tools launched for charities

17 Aug 2016

The Inspiring Impact programme, a free digital impact measurement service managed by New Philanthropy...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising