Share

Camelot challenges Gambling Commission's actions on Health Lottery in High Court

High Court. Image copyright Chris Harvey.
News

Camelot challenges Gambling Commission's actions on Health Lottery in High Court1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 12 Jul 2012

The Gambling Commission told the government that the Health Lottery was on the “borders of technical legality” before its launch, the lawyer representing the operator of the National Lottery told the High Court yesterday.

And the Commission itself has made a “legally bad” decision in not ordering a wholesale review of the Health Lottery’s operations, Camelot claims.

Camelot made the points in the High Court yesterday as part of its application for a judicial review of the Gambling Commission’s licensing of the Health Lottery, which launched in October last year.

But counsel for the Gambling Commission, James Goudie QC, characterised Camelot’s position as “the same old discredited case”. He said it was not the responsibility of the Gambling Commission to protect the National Lottery’s market position.

“This has, throughout, been grossly overblown litigation. Preposterously so,” he said.

Lord Pannick QC, acting on behalf of Camelot, outlined most of the company’s claim against the Gambling Commission, which was amended only days ago following the Commission’s decision last month to open a review into the Health Lottery’s marketing and promotion.  Both the Health Lottery and the 51 community interest companies (societies) which employ the Health Lottery as an external lottery manager opposed the consideration of the amended claim, but the judges allowed it. The original claim was that the Gambling Commission was wrong in not instigating a review of the Health Lottery operations, but Camelot now claims that the present review does not go far enough.

Goudie said that even with the amendment, the claim against the regulator is out of time. “Whatever the form my learned friend puts it, it remains a challenge to the September 2010 decision [to license the Health Lottery], in which case it’s out of time,” he said.

Lord Pannick was due to address the issue of the delay of the case this morning.

The structure of the Health Lottery is complex. Law allows for society lotteries to turn over £10m a year, with a minimum 20 per cent payout to good causes. The Health Lottery works as an external lottery manager for 51 societies. Players can buy lottery tickets from anywhere in the country, but in any given week one or two region-based societies will benefit from the proceeds (these are identified on the tickets themselves). The charitable money is paid into the People’s Health Trust which distributes it as grants to health projects in the regions designated to benefit from that week’s draw.

Outlining his case yesterday Lord Pannick alleged: “It is plain from the material that the Commissioner has had – and continues to have – concerns about the legality of the [Health Lottery] scheme.”

He claimed the decision to hold a review into only the marketing and promotion of the Health Lottery “makes no sense” and that the Commission has used a “legally bad” reason for not conducting a wholesale statutory review. According to communications presented by Lord Pannick, the Gambling Commission considered it outside its remit to protect the National Lottery and suggested that the government should intervene if it wanted to.

'Commission must uphold rules made by Parliament'

“Of course it’s not the role of the Gambling Commission to protect Camelot, but it is its role to uphold the fundamental limits on society lotteries that Parliament has seen fit to impose,” said Lord Pannick.

The other tenets of the Camelot argument are that the Commission has failed to resolve “its own fundamental concerns” about whether the 51 CICs operate independently of each other and the Health Lottery, and the allegation that the CICs were set up for the Health Lottery, and not vice versa.

Lord Pannick quoted communications from Gambling Commission chief executive Jenny Williams to the Department for Culture Media and Sport dating back to before the Health Lottery’s launch, in which she said that the Commission expected the Lottery to be on the “borders of technical legality” at launch. She also told the Department it needed to decide whether to close the “loophole” which allows the Lottery to operate at a national level.

The Gambling Commission and Health Lottery are expected to make their submissions to the court today.

The hearing is expected to run until tomorrow.

Tracey Cummins
Fundraising&Voluntary Services Manager
Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust
3 Aug 2012

I really object to this lottery. I have read the criteria for charitable giving and I feel it is misleading. NHS charities are unable to apply for medical equipment. Most people I know assume that it will mainly help hospitals.

Our NHS budget does not cover everything and we rely on charitable donations to introduce the very latest technology. We pride ourselves as being one of only a few hospitals that can now carry out life saving proceedures to help cancer patients as well as many other diseases. Without charitable donations patients will not benefit from all the latest technology.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Free eNews

Big Society Capital invests £10m to support charity bond growth

25 Jul 2014

Big Society Capital has announced a £10m Charity Bond Support Fund to encourage more charities into the...

HSBC to close bank account of Muslim charity working in Gaza

25 Jul 2014

HSBC has informed the Ummah Welfare Trust that it will close its bank accounts because the charity “now...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Commission clarifies statements on staff attendance at board meetings

25 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has rewritten its operational compliance report on the case of Southwark Muslim...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Workfare charities set to be named after Tribunal rules against DWP

23 Jul 2014

Charities that are involved in the workfare programme run by the Department for Work and Pensions look...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising