Share

'Tax before charity' debate will return, Bowcock warns

Matthew Bowcock, chair, Community Foundation Network
News

'Tax before charity' debate will return, Bowcock warns

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 9 Jul 2012

The sector would be naïve to assume that the government will not revisit the prospect of limiting tax relief on charitable giving just because the Chancellor u-turned on the latest proposal, the chair of Community Foundation Networks has warned.

In a discussion paper titled Lessons from the ‘charity tax’, Matthew Bowcock states that the debate around the tax relief cap highlighted some important issues that have still not been resolved, or even properly examined.

He wrote: “It would be naïve to assume that because the Chancellor has withdrawn the current proposal, tax relief for charitable giving will not be questioned again in the future, as there remain two conflicting fairness principles.

“On the one hand, Treasury and HMRC argue that everyone should pay a fair share of tax and you should not be able to hypothecate their taxes; on the other hand, charities argue that you should not be taxed on what is not yours as you have given it away to society. These two principles are not easily reconciled.”

Not enough evidence about giving

Bowcock also says that the debacle has exposed the lack of adequate data on giving.  “Apart from the NCVO and Coutts Million Pound Donor annual reports, there is virtually no information available on the proportion of higher-rate taxpayers that give, how much they give and to which causes.

“HM Treasury … observed that the charity sector;s estimates of the potential impact did not square with their figures. This may be because Treausry was also working from crude data.”  Better data could have led to better understanding of the impact and stopped the proposal from ever seeing the light of day, he suggests.

He points out that accurate data on tax reliefs for giving does exist in HMRC computer systems and it should be possible for it to extract this for public consumption, so that everyone could be better informed about the substance of proposed changes rather than arguing over estimates of impact.

Philanthropists shoud expect more scrutiny and be prepared

Bowcock concludes by warning philanthropists that they should now expect to come under increasing scrutiny and pressure to justify the public benefits that their giving delivers in return for tax reliefs.

“In any future debate philanthropy must find better ways to argue its value by presenting the benefits that it brings to society.  Evidence needs to go beyond quantifying the amount of giving…and include the economic and quantifiable social value delivered by philanthropic investments in projects.

“Only then will the true value of independent philanthropy be appreciated and its role established in Britain’s culture.”

Click here to read the full paper.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Understanding Charities Group launches to improve public trust in the sector

25 Nov 2014

A cross-sector alliance of charities has formally launched the Understanding Charities Group, aimed at...

Alzheimer’s Society income up £12m

24 Nov 2014

The Alzheimer’s Society has seen its income increase by 17 per cent, from £70.8m in 2013 to £82.6m...

RNIB chief executive criticises ‘arrogance’ of MPs who think charities must learn from private sector

21 Nov 2014

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, yesterday said she had a “struggle with the arrogance”...

Understanding Charities Group launches to improve public trust in the sector

25 Nov 2014

A cross-sector alliance of charities has formally launched the Understanding Charities Group, aimed at...

Commission launches consultation on updated guidance for trustees

25 Nov 2014

The Charity Commission has today launched a consultation on updated guidance on the basics of trusteeship...

Marie Curie drops the words 'Cancer Care' from name

25 Nov 2014

Marie Curie has dropped the words ‘Cancer Care’ from its name in the lead-up to a rebrand of the care...

JustGiving launches free guide to raising money using social media

25 Nov 2014

JustGiving and social media consultancy Social Misfits Media have launched a guide to how charities and...

OSCR launches new website

20 Nov 2014

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator has launched a new website which includes a new search function.

Data from controversial Samaritans app to be deleted

17 Nov 2014

Samaritans has promised that all data collected by its Twitter monitoring app will be deleted and the...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising