Wind turbine blade donated to Tate in protest

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 9 Jul 2012

Tate will have to go through an official process to decide whether to accept a 16.5-metre wind turbine blade, dumped in protest in the Tate Modern’s Turbine Hall on Saturday, as part of its permanent collection.

The ‘gift’ of the one-and-a-half tonne wind turbine blade is the latest act in a campaign of artistic protest against the Tate’s longstanding relationship with sponsors BP. More than 100 people were involved in Liberate Tate’s effort to transport the structure from a Welsh valley to the Tate Modern’s cavernous hall, and in submitting the blade as ‘a gift to the nation’, the organisation is required to officially consider the blade’s inclusion in its permanent collection.

Sharon Palmer from Liberate Tate repeated her organisation’s claims that BP uses its association with the Tate to whitewash its environmental and human rights record.

Turbine blade in Turbine Hall, by Immo Klink

“Liberate Tate has created this artwork using an icon of renewable energy with an express wish that Tate will have the courage to take leadership in addressing the threat of catastrophic climate change and end its relationship with BP,” she said.

In a letter to Tate, the campaigning group described the blade as “perhaps the largest present you have ever received, the most unexpected and the most disobedient, the strangest and the hardest to get rid of”.

The campaigners went on to claim that: “Tate continue to promote the burning of fossil fuels by taking the poisoned gift of funding from BP. This is why today we have given you something you could not refuse.”

Tate released a statement confirming that protestors had left the blade in the Turbine Hall and that security staff had removed it.

Photo credit: Immo Klink

Directory: Tate Gallery

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.