Share

Wind turbine blade donated to Tate in protest

Photo credit: Immo Klink
News

Wind turbine blade donated to Tate in protest

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 9 Jul 2012

Tate will have to go through an official process to decide whether to accept a 16.5-metre wind turbine blade, dumped in protest in the Tate Modern’s Turbine Hall on Saturday, as part of its permanent collection.

The ‘gift’ of the one-and-a-half tonne wind turbine blade is the latest act in a campaign of artistic protest against the Tate’s longstanding relationship with sponsors BP. More than 100 people were involved in Liberate Tate’s effort to transport the structure from a Welsh valley to the Tate Modern’s cavernous hall, and in submitting the blade as ‘a gift to the nation’, the organisation is required to officially consider the blade’s inclusion in its permanent collection.

Sharon Palmer from Liberate Tate repeated her organisation’s claims that BP uses its association with the Tate to whitewash its environmental and human rights record.

Turbine blade in Turbine Hall, by Immo Klink


“Liberate Tate has created this artwork using an icon of renewable energy with an express wish that Tate will have the courage to take leadership in addressing the threat of catastrophic climate change and end its relationship with BP,” she said.

In a letter to Tate, the campaigning group described the blade as “perhaps the largest present you have ever received, the most unexpected and the most disobedient, the strangest and the hardest to get rid of”.

The campaigners went on to claim that: “Tate continue to promote the burning of fossil fuels by taking the poisoned gift of funding from BP. This is why today we have given you something you could not refuse.”

Tate released a statement confirming that protestors had left the blade in the Turbine Hall and that security staff had removed it.

Photo credit: Immo Klink

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Access Foundation to invest endowment in social investment

24 Aug 2016

Access: the Foundation for Social Investment has announced it will put its endowment from the Cabinet...

Charity investigated after it did not know its own income

23 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into a charity that underestimated its own annual income...

Charities ask Treasury for clarity on EU funding for the sector

22 Aug 2016

Charity representative bodies have written to the Treasury seeking assurances about European Union funding....

Charity Commission should ‘avoid the temptation to look tough’ when it starts disqualifying trustees

24 Aug 2016

Other infrastructure bodies have joined NCVO in raising concerns about how the Charity Commission might...

New Commission powers ‘threaten the independence of charities’, NCVO warns

23 Aug 2016

Some of the Charity Commission’s new powers “threaten the independence of charities”, NCVO has said...

Shaw Trust criticises Ofsted following ‘inadequate’ grading

23 Aug 2016

The Shaw Trust has criticised Ofsted following an investigation published earlier this month which described...

RSPCA ranked fourth in global charity social media brand index

19 Aug 2016

A new social media index has said that the RSPCA has the fourth best digital charity brand globally, with...

Charity Commission retracts story which indicated it would no longer publish all accounts

18 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has published a news story announcing it will no longer display documents received...

New versions of free online impact measurement tools launched for charities

17 Aug 2016

The Inspiring Impact programme, a free digital impact measurement service managed by New Philanthropy...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising