Share

Oxfam celebrates Federer's 7th Wimbledon victory over Murray

Image copyright: Squeakyknees,2009
News

Oxfam celebrates Federer's 7th Wimbledon victory over Murray3

Fundraising | Kirsty Weakley | 9 Jul 2012

Roger Federer’s victory yesterday might have been a blow for British tennis, but it was good news for Oxfam which will pocket more than £100,000 from a bet placed by a man who left his estate to the charity.

Oxfam is putting the £101,840, enough to feed 10,000 people affected by the food crisis in West Africa for one month, into its unrestricted fund.

Nicholas Newlife, who left his estate to the charity in his will, placed the bet of £1,520 at 66/1 on Federer to win the men’s singles at Wimbledon at least seven times before 2020.

Andrew Barton, head of relationship marketing at Oxfam said: “All of Oxfam have been cheering Federer’s progress for the past couple of weeks. The real hero, though, must be Mr Newlife, for his generous gift and his tremendous sporting acumen.”

He added: “We hope Mr Newlife’s legacy – and Federer’s win – will inspire other people to support Oxfam and our West Africa appeal.”

Graham Sharpe, from William Hill, who took the bets said: “Normally we’d have mixed feelings about paying out such a hefty six-figure sum, but in this instance it seems that it was meant to be, and we are delighted that a sad story has had a very positive conclusion.”

The charity still stands to make up to £200,000 more from bets placed by Newlife on tennis player Andy Roddick and cricketer Ramnaresh Sarwan. In 2010 it claimed £16,000 from a bet that Federer would win 14 grand slam titles by 2020.

Each year Oxfam receives between £12m and £13m in legacies, which represents 12 to 13 per cent of its income to supporters. So far Newlife is the only person to have bequeathed betting slips. Other unusual legacies include a pair of gold teath and dentist’s chair (from a former dentist) and the royalties from books and plays, including Doctor Finlay’s Casebook.

Outstanding bets

  • £1,000 on Andy Roddick to win at least seven grand slam singles titles before 2020 at 33/1 – this would win £34,000.
  • £750 on Andy Roddick to win at least ten grand slam singles titles before 2020 at 100/1 – this would win £75,075.
  • £350 on Ramnaresh Sarwan to make over 7,000 test match runs by the end of 2019 at 50/1 – this would win £17,850.
  • £300 on Ramnaresh Sarwan to make more than 8,000 test match runs by the end of 2019 at 100/1 – this would win £30,300.
  • £250 on Ramnaresh Sarwan to make more than 9,000 test match runs by the end of 2019 at 250/1 – this would win £62,750.

 

 

Nick
10 Jul 2012

I love it when bets help a good cause. This was very generous of Newlife!
There is a new toilet paper organisation that uses 50% of profits to build toilets and improve sanitation in the developing world. I had a bet that they would reach their funding goal www.indiegogo.com/whogivesacrap

Rob Dyson
PR Manager
CharityComms
9 Jul 2012

Wow, "unrestricted funding" - surely Oxfam might have had a tighter, more personal message for the family of Mr Newlife than that? Juxtapose this with The Samaritans' reaction to the generosity of donors following Claire Squires untimely death, and it seems a little trite?

I know that project restricting £100k in a charity's terms is crazy, but - if only for PR purposes - it might have been nice to have given a more personal comment. E.g. that 'the money will go into a fund in Mr Newlife's memory, and the charity will endeavour to spend the money on projects that he would have had specific passion for...'

We all know the leccy bills need to be paid, staff salaries, overheads, and bricks and mortar must all be covered, but this story achieved viral status over the weekend, and made Radio 4's flagship Today programme this morning. A high profile gift warrants a more delicate response perhaps?

To step away from Oxfam, it's a shame we all let donors - and their memory - down sometimes by not being specific or tangible about the impact of their valuable and generous gift.

Rob Dyson
PR Manager
CharityComms
10 Jul 2012
Response to [Rob Dyson]

Okay, so I concede I was playing (a bad) devil's advocate in my earlier comment; but my point led to an interesting and lively debate on twitter about how legacy giving might better position itself; the public trust in charities’ spending; and how we (charities) articulate vital unrestricted funds in a tangible way.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Governance code 'no longer fit' for large charities, says CFG trustee

17 Sep 2014

The sector’s code of good governance is no longer fit for purpose for large and complex charities and...

Ring-fencing public service contracts for charities is a bad idea, NPC tells Labour

16 Sep 2014

NPC has warned that introducing charity-only contracts is the “wrong approach to take”, in its response...

Man jailed for stealing £300,000 of donations meant for Help for Heroes

16 Sep 2014

A man has been jailed for four and a half years for stealing £300,000 donated by the public who believed...

Shawcross: 'Too often charities respond defensively'

17 Sep 2014

Sector leaders warned yesterday that charities need to get better at answering the public’s questions...

Governance code 'no longer fit' for large charities, says CFG trustee

17 Sep 2014

The sector’s code of good governance is no longer fit for purpose for large and complex charities and...

BHF implements changes following invoice fraud

17 Sep 2014

The British Heart Foundation (BHF) has said it will implement tighter controls to prevent future cases...

JustGiving page for Manchester Dogs’ Home receives four donations a second

15 Sep 2014

JustGiving has said that donations going to an appeal for the Manchester Dogs’ Home following an arson...

Commission's new online charity search to launch soon after delay

15 Sep 2014

The Charity Commission’s searchable online register of charities is due to launch in beta this autumn,...

Charities warned that digital campaigns can be 'counterproductive'

9 Sep 2014

Charity digital campaigns can be counterproductive and will need to change to keep the attention of those...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising