Share

Giving donors control over comms reduces retention, finds survey

Giving donors control over comms reduces retention, finds survey
News

Giving donors control over comms reduces retention, finds survey

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 20 Jun 2012

Allowing donors to choose how a charity communicates with them has a negative effect on donor retention, according to an annual report on face-to-face fundraising.

Charities increased the amount of contact they had with donors signed up via face-to-face fundraising in 2010, but the researchers behind the annual Donor Acquisition and Retention Survey (DARS) warn that allowing donors to choose how they are communicated with at the outset reduces the retention rate by 3.5 percentage points over five years.

Morag Fleming and Rupert Tappin, from Future Fundraising, presented a mixed picture regarding face-to-face attrition in their report released at the PFRA annual general meeting yesterday.

While customising letters with appeals increases retention by 5 per cent, asking donors to take part in campaigns has no effect, the analysis produced by Prof Adrian Sargeant found.  

Fleming and Tappin changed the advice they had given to charities in 2008 on the back of the research. The pair now recommend charities not give donors control over the type and frequency of communications within the first six months.

Attrition up on street, down on door and private sites

DARS, which compiled the donor acquisition and retention results of 30 PFRA members (representing 43 per cent of its members which ran face-to-face campaigns in 2010), found that eight-month attrition levels in 2010 had increased for street fundraising, but fallen for doorstep and private site-recruited donors.

The latest PFRA figures for recruitment show street fundraising sign-ups increased by nearly 40 per cent last year.

By the end of eight months, 48.08 per cent of donors who signed up to a street fundraising campaign in 2010 had stopped giving, compared with 40.65 per cent of doorstep recruits and 30.10 per cent of those signing up at private sites. In 2009 those figures were 45.78 per cent, 45.60 per cent and 36.85 per cent respectively.

Doorstep donors had a higher gift level in 2010 too, giving an average of £8.56 before gift aid compared to £7.99 from street-recruited donors, although the latter figure rose more significantly year-on-year.

Face-to-face attrition variables

The causes with the best attrition rates were environmental charities, followed by human rights, although the samples were very small.

Analysis conducted by Prof Sargeant found a number of other variable impacts on attrition: every £1 increase in ask-level resulted in a 2.4 percentage point reduction in retention over five years and in-house campaigns performed 1 percentage point worse than agency-run ones over the same time period. 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Man admits stealing £300,000 from collections for Help for Heroes

29 Jul 2014

A man has admitted pocketing £300,000 donated by members of the public who believed it would go to Help...

Up to 144 jobs could go at Royal Voluntary Service as part of restructure

29 Jul 2014

Royal Voluntary Service is planning to make up to 144 redundancies in both its operations and support...

Children's charities call for an end to 'price-driven competition' in public service provision

28 Jul 2014

A coalition of 29 children’s charities and trade unions including Barnardo's and Action for Children...

Commission investigates charity over concerns it was used for private benefit

29 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into grant-giver the Catalyst Trust over concerns...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

Big Society Network chair’s company gave £64k to Conservative Party

28 Jul 2014

A company owned by the chair of Big Society Network donated services totalling more than £54,000 to the...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising