Share

Institute of Fundraising CEO backs Scope against Bromley Council

Bromley resident, Judith Hope
News

Institute of Fundraising CEO backs Scope against Bromley Council

Fundraising | Kirsty Weakley | 23 May 2012

Peter Lewis has criticised Bromley Council for its decision to oust Scope from clothing recycling bins on its property, in favour of a private company.

The chief executive of the Institute of Fundraising took to Twitter to describe the council’s actions as “madness”. The charity has also collected more than 1,000 signatures from residents, but the council shows no sign of backing down. In fact, it said the charity should think about collecting door-to-door instead or shifting its recycling banks to private property.

Scope has 34 charity clothing banks on the council sites which supply four of its charity shops in the area. It estimates that the decision will cost the charity £360,000 per year through missing out on donations.

Richard Hawkes, chief executive of Scope said that if the trend continues it “will cost charities like Scope millions in donations”.

"We urge councils to think twice before deciding to sell off these sites. They make a big difference by supporting the work of charities, like Scope," he added.

In a consultation document the council predicted that handing the site to Veolia, which already had a contract with the council to provide waste disposal services, would make between £75,000 and £135,000 for the council from its cut of the sale of donated goods.

The campaign against Bromley's decision is being supported by Charity Retail Association, which is coordinating the national campaign calling on councils to continue work with charities. Scope is collecting signatures from customers in its Bromley South, Petts Wood, Beckenham Junction and Orpington shops and plans to hand the petition to the council before the 31 May deadline.

Last year Hertfordshire and Northumberland councils made a similar decision which meant Scope was unable to collect donations from 46 banks and losing out on £400,000 worth of donations.

In March London Councils and the London Waste and Recycling Board revealed that they were considering creating a single textile recycling bank contract for the capital based on Hertfordshire model.

Council shows no sign of budging

Executive councillor for the environment at Bromley Council, Colin Smith defended the council's decision and said: “We remain extremely supportive of all charities and the valuable work that they do and strongly encourage local residents to donate their clothes to a charity of their choice. This can easily be done at one of many charity shops dotted around the Borough, including Scope’s own, rather than simply supporting a single charity as the old banks have been doing.

“The new collection service will serve to support many charities as well as providing local employment, as the company who recycle the collected textiles make significant donations to a number of charities, in excess of £2m per year.”

He also highlighted that over the last few years the amount of clothing collected from the banks had been declining, from 472 tonnes in 2007/08 to 176 tonnes in 2011/12.

He said: “We are simply changing our policy to reflect what many councils have always done. Recycling banks are not as popular as they were and door-to-door collections are proving to be more popular and effective.”

A spokesman for the charity told civilsociety.co.uk that: “If donations are going down then it is more important to hang onto these sites.”

Smith suggested that Scope consider door-to-door collections or could “relocate their banks on private land if they wish to.”

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

RSPCA sees voluntary income gradually increase following decline

26 May 2015

RSPCA has seen its income begin to increase, following a dramatic drop of £12m in its previous year’s...

Charities invited to participate in 24th annual Charity Shops Survey

26 May 2015

Charities with retail operations are now invited to respond to the 24th annual Charity Shops Survey, the...

Children's centre numbers fell by 800 after almost £500m of cuts, says Barnardo's

22 May 2015

Almost a quarter of children’s centres across the UK have been forced to close or merge as a result...

Sir Ian Botham threatens to sue RSPB for libel

26 May 2015

Sir Ian Botham has threatened the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds with a lawsuit, claiming the...

Think carefully before changing your name, says free guide to rebranding

22 May 2015

Charities considering changing their name must first find out exactly what their staff, beneficiaries...

Homeless shelter investigated over ‘significant private benefit’ payments

22 May 2015

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into a Bristol-based shelter after concerns were...

Children's Society and NSPCC to improve their digital services

26 May 2015

The Children's Society and NSPCC both said last week they plan to revamp digital services for young people,...

RNLI releases first charity app for the Apple Watch

26 May 2015

The Royal National Lifeboat Institution has today launched what it believes to be the first UK charity...

Marie Curie grows visitor time and donor numbers online by a quarter after digital relaunch

22 May 2015

Marie Curie set out to improve its use of digital after realising that it was “limiting its future”...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising