Share

ASA: Greenpeace donations site ‘encouraged anti-social behaviour’

ASA: Greenpeace donations site ‘encouraged anti-social behaviour’
News

ASA: Greenpeace donations site ‘encouraged anti-social behaviour’1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 16 May 2012

Greenpeace has been warned against using its advertising to encourage anti-social behaviour after the Advertising Standards Authority upheld a complaint about its website which solicited donations for direct action against a coal power plant.

The advertising regulator received one complaint about a donation option on the greenpeacegiving.org.uk website which asked for an £80 donation to ‘redecorate a power station chimney’.

The marketing presented the donation as a restricted gift for direct action against a proposed new coal power plant in Kingsnorth, Kent. “Shutting down dirty power stations is just one of the ways Greenpeace is working to secure a clean energy future, but painting down the side of giant chimneys cranks up the political pressure and throws a vital spotlight on one of the greatest threats to our climate,” the website read.

The ASA agreed with the complaint that the advertisement, in asking for donations for protestors to paint the chimney with an anti-coal slogan, encouraged and condoned anti-social behaviour, which “would in some circumstances be illegal”.

“We concluded that the ad was harmful and irresponsible,” the regulator said in an adjudication published today.

Greenpeace has been told not to publish the ad again and warned to make sure that in future its advertising does not encourage or condone anti-social behaviour.

A spokeswoman for Greenpeace said that soliciting donations from individuals was critical to the charity’s independence and ability to go to the “front-line of environmental damage”.

“We're going to keep doing that, whether it's stopping climate change pollution at its source, or sailing to the Arctic to stop oil drilling. But we certainly didn't set out to flout any law or regulation on our website, so we took down the advertisement,” she said.

The ASA has only had the power to adjudicate on marketing on organisations’ websites since last March, when its remit was substantially expanded. The regulator's remit also extends to Facebook and other social networks.

Barry Johnston
16 May 2012

This is another worrying erosion of Britain's beleaguered civil liberties. The ASA adjudication against Greenpeace UK means that not only is everyone in the United Kingdon banned from promoting non-violent civil disobedience via all media covered by ASA (ie broadcast, print and internet, even Twitter) but that under ASA rules peat transgressors can even be banned by advertisers from even accepting material such as "demonstrate at XXX place" tweets, if the demonstration is not pre-authorised or may deliver civil disobedience. This repressive decision potentially prevents the "Arab Spring" from ever happening in UK. Please alert people to this erosion of civil liberty.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Former Thomas Cook boss donates £3m to charity over hotel deaths

28 May 2015

Former Thomas Cook chief executive Harriet Green said she will donate more than £3m of a £10m shares...

Big Lottery Fund awards £7m to Plan UK and Save the Children to help rebuild typhoon-struck communities

28 May 2015

The Big Lottery Fund will award more than £7m to two UK charities to help rebuild communities in the...

Grant Thornton assistant manager jailed for more than three years over £726,000 charity embezzlement

27 May 2015

A former assistant manager at Grant Thornton has been jailed for 40 months after embezzling more than...

Big Society Capital chief executive to step down by end of year

29 May 2015

Nick O’Donohoe, the chief executive of Big Society Capital, has today announced that he will be leaving...

Commission: 'serious concerns' about charity asking sex crime director to reconsider resignation

29 May 2015

The Charity Commission has said it would have "serious regulatory concerns" if an aid charity presses...

National Trust for Scotland appoints new chief executive

29 May 2015

The National Trust for Scotland has announced that Simon Skinner has been appointed as its new chief executive....

Charity chief executives and trustees 'lack leadership' on digital technology, says report

28 May 2015

A "lack of brave leadership" is holding the sector back from exploiting digital technologies, according...

One-fifth of charities surveyed do not accept donations through their own websites

27 May 2015

Some 20 per cent of charities do not accept donations via their own websites, and 38 per cent are not...

Children's Society and NSPCC to improve their digital services

26 May 2015

The Children's Society and NSPCC both said last week they plan to revamp digital services for young people,...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising