Share

More regulation on will-writing aims to protect legacy givers

More regulation on will-writing aims to protect legacy givers
News

More regulation on will-writing aims to protect legacy givers

Fundraising | Jonathan Last | 23 Apr 2012

Industry regulator the Legal Services Board has today announced proposals to deliver better protection for will writers from "unacceptable service" that can be detrimental to legacy-giving.

The report Enhancing consumer protection, reducing regulatory restrictions: will-writing, probate and estate administration activities is a consultation document about the LSB‘s provisional recommendations on the regulatory approach to will-writing, and includes its findings about how poor will-writing services have resulted in charities missing out on funds intended to be bequeathed to them.

The Board’s investigation found that consumers are frequently targeted by “unfair sales practices”, and it has accumulated extensive evidence of “fraud and deception”. It intends to bring will-writing “in line with better regulation principles and ensure that appropriate protections are in place no matter who delivers the service”.

“It is clear that detriment will often be experienced by intended beneficiaries who receive less income than was intended or face significant legal costs and delays trying to put right errors or clarify ambiguities,” the LSB stated in the report.

“Detriments extend to charities as well as individuals. A third of the 140 member charities surveyed by Remember a Charity had experienced a negative impact as the result of a poorly-drafted will.”

Specifically, 11 per cent lost the legacy completely, 33 per cent received a reduced legacy and 48 per cent experienced a delay in receiving the legacy. A further 52 per cent reported incurring legal costs to sort out the problem.

The LSB's document also quotes the findings of the Institute of Legacy Management, which reports that many charities have had to write off legacies where legal fees would be needed to correct a problem incurred by inefficient will-writing.

Roland Rudd, founder of Legacy10, which encourages legacy giving, applauded the LSB's move.

“The number of people leaving a will in this country lags behind many of our peers," said Rudd. "I welcome the Legal Services Board findings and urge the legal profession to look at ways of reassuring and encouraging the public to make a will. Not only will this provide greater certainty for many families but also enhance a valuable source of funding for the charitable sector.

"The recent changes to inheritance tax, which I have been promoting, incentivises charities to persuade people to leave them a small part of their estate.”

Legacy consultant Richard Radcliffe told civilsociety.co.uk that a move like this is essential. “There are a lot of scumbags out there conning people into writing unsuitable wills,” said Radcliffe.

“Dodgy firms will use out-of-work actors to go door-to-door and bring in clients. This is obviously atrocious in terms of safeguarding, resulting in a situation where the will-writer has never met the client.

“The Charity Commission does provide helpful guidelines, recommending that people use firms accredited by the Institute of Professional Willwriters, but the will-writing industry has proved notoriously hard to regulate completely. So any move to increase regulation is a positive one.”

The full LSB document is available here, and the Board is welcoming views on its approach by Wednesday 16 July 2012.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Big Society Capital invests £10m to support charity bond growth

25 Jul 2014

Big Society Capital has announced a £10m Charity Bond Support Fund to encourage more charities into the...

HSBC to close bank account of Muslim charity working in Gaza

25 Jul 2014

HSBC has informed the Ummah Welfare Trust that it will close its bank accounts because the charity “now...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Commission clarifies statements on staff attendance at board meetings

25 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has rewritten its operational compliance report on the case of Southwark Muslim...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Workfare charities set to be named after Tribunal rules against DWP

23 Jul 2014

Charities that are involved in the workfare programme run by the Department for Work and Pensions look...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising