Share

ASA dismisses complaints against Health Lottery adverts

ASA dismisses complaints against Health Lottery adverts
News

ASA dismisses complaints against Health Lottery adverts

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 18 Apr 2012

The Advertising Standards Authority has dismissed complaints about the prize figures quoted in Health Lottery advertising.

The ASA received six complaints about a television advertisement for the new lottery which told viewers that they’d win £50 if they matched three balls, £500 if four matched and £100,000 if all five matched. A few complaints were also made about a Health Lottery press advert which made the same £100,000 claim and said that players are seven-times more likely to win £100,000 playing the Health Lottery than they are by playing Lotto.

Most complaints, however, questioned whether the Health Lottery was misleading in stating that the top prize was £100,000, and not “up to £100,000”.

All complaints were dismissed by the advertising regulator, which was satisfied with evidence from the Health Lottery and Clearcast that the lottery is run as a fixed-prize game, and that pay-out amounts did not vary.

Clearcast said that the insurance it has against large numbers of winners getting the top £100,000 prize meant that statistically the Health Lottery would not be able to pay out to all winners just once in every 200 years. Clearcast and the ASA have judged, therefore, that the Health Lottery does not need to publish any small print caveats to cover the 0.0096 per cent chance that the Lottery will not be able to make good on its prize claims.

The 'seven times more likely to win' claim was also found to be robust.

Martin Hall, chief executive of the Health Lottery welcomed the ASA ruling. “It is great to receive confirmation from the ASA that our marketing and communications have been delivered to the highest standards,” he said. 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Children's charities call for an end to 'price-driven competition' in public service provision

28 Jul 2014

A coalition of 29 children’s charities and trade unions including Barnardo's and Action for Children...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

Big Society Network chair’s company gave £64k to Conservative Party

28 Jul 2014

A company owned by the chair of Big Society Network donated services totalling more than £54,000 to the...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

Big Society Network chair’s company gave £64k to Conservative Party

28 Jul 2014

A company owned by the chair of Big Society Network donated services totalling more than £54,000 to the...

CLG seconded five staff to help set up Big Society Network

25 Jul 2014

The Department for Communities and Local Government seconded five civil servants to Big Society Network...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising