Share

Big Give to review match fund after high demand crashed site

Big Give to review match fund after high demand crashed site
News

Big Give to review match fund after high demand crashed site 1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 5 Jan 2012

The Big Give is reviewing last December’s match fund challenge, which raised more than £11.5m, after unprecedented levels of demand forced the challenge to be postponed for a day.

The Big Give is today contacting the charities that participated in the challenge, which requires them to secure match funding from their own major donors and trustees, to invite them to air their concerns in a review of the challenge which is due to be held in two weeks.

A number of charities had complained to the Fundraising Standards Board (FRSB) after the website was forced to close on the first day of the challenge due to high level of demand. While in 2010 the Big Give website had attracted 17,000 donations between 6 December and the end of the month, last year’s challenge saw more than 18,000 donations processed within five days. At its peak, last December’s challenge processed 130 donations per minute.

The Big Give has now instructed an independent qualitative research company, working pro bono, to hold two focus groups with up to 20 charities involved. They will discuss problems, concerns or positive feedback about the challenge and their input will work in addition to the normal email feedback the Big Give solicits from match fund participants.

Ashley Bowe, managing director of the Big Give, told civilsociety.co.uk that there will definitely be changes to the way the programme is run because this high level of demand is likely to continue.

“Without question there will be changes. With the increased demand that there was last year, we can’t run it in the same set-up again, otherwise the same thing will happen again,” he said.

Bowe said that the structure for the focus group has not yet been decided, but he would like the review to focus on the events of the week of the match fund challenge itself.

“But I’m leaving it in the hands of the research group,” he said. “We’re trying to demonstrate to the charities that we’re really trying to take on board what they’ve got to say in as fair a manner as possible.”

FRSB meeting

The Big Give met with the FRSB following complaints by some of its members about the challenge, even though the organisation itself is not a member of the FRSB.

Bowe said that meeting with the FRSB was an efficient way of dealing with the concerns raised by a number of charities at once.

Alistair McLean, chief executive of the FRSB, told civilsociety.co.uk that the regulator was happy with the Big Give’s response to the website crash, and that it will be involved in the review process.

“We’re more than happy for them to be involved,” said Bowe.

Challenge success

In total, last year’s challenge has raised more than £11.5m, with £1.1m raised in gift aid from online donations alone. The average amount raised by charities participating in the event was £25,000, but 13 charities managed to perform significantly above that, each raising more than £100,000 in the five days. WWF UK was the biggest winner, raising a total of £250,375, followed by the Prince’s Trust which raised £217,324. 

Colleen Wickstead
Project Co-ordinator
Telford and Wrekin CVS
10 Jan 2012

2011 was only the second time we had participated in the Big Give. We see this " campaign" as an opportunity to practice our fundraising skills.
It was quite a challenge to pass the "test" to be accepted onto the campaign. Our biggest problem is growing the confidence of our supporters to make online donations, at present they prefer to hand over cash or cheques. The making of pledges, took this problem a step further. We recogonise that as a CVS we need to "educate" our supporters and the local public, as we operate in a very urban location any assistance in this area from a Big Give review would be grately appreciated.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising