Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes
24 May 2012
The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...
The director of an ethics training consultancy has encouraged charities to have a good model for checking that a donor is a ‘fit and proper person’, in light of Lord Woolf’s damning inquiry into the London School of Economics' (LSE) donation from Saif Gaddafi's Foundation.
Bernard Ross, director of the Management Centre, made the statement in response to Lord Woolf's report, released yesterday, criticising LSE's procedures for vetting donations which saw the university accepting a donation of £1.5m from Saif Gaddafi's Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation.
Lord Woolf complained that the source of money for the donation was never established by LSE.
“If what the LSE was told by Saif about the source of the donation is taken at face value, the due diligence obtained on the gift should have raised real concerns,” he said.
He continued: “On the available information the source of the donation could have been payments made to gain Saif’s favour. The funding was said to be coming from payments made to Saif’s Foundation by foreign contractors operating in Libya, one of which, according to the due diligence available at the time, had a prior conviction for bribery.
“Why would foreign companies operating in Libya want to donate to the LSE through the conduit of Saif’s Foundation?”
Lord Woolf recommended that LSE adopt an up-to-date policy on donations, as part of its code on ethical and reputational risk.
This donation policy, he said, should include procedures for the scrutiny of proposed donations with clear lines of responsibility and guidelines on the appropriate relationship between the LSE and a donor.
Ross recommends that charities read the report:
“LSE's reputation has been hugely damaged by this - especially internationally. And the same thing has happened to other organisations who have been similarly caught in the past - for example Vilar and the Royal Opera House," he said.
“We, sadly, don't trust many people these days - politicians, sportspeople, journalists, bankers… so charities are one of the few groups who still score high on credibility. We need to protect that as reputation for the whole sector.
“Part of stewardship is checking that the donor is a 'fit and proper person' and that the money has been properly obtained. Unicef have some outstanding guidelines on this and these should be a model for others. This report needs to be widely read.”
Adrian Beney, a fundraising consultant at More Partnerships, who today has written a blog on the issue, adds that the issue of who to accept donations from can be grey:
"I know of a development charity which does not accept donations from arms manufacturers except in serious emergency or a humanitarian disaster, where they accept donations from anybody. It’s the dilemma of turning down money which could save lives."
He added that the LSE had taken the donation at a time when then-Prime Minister Tony Blair had gone to Libya, and the Foreign Office was encouraging ties between the UK and the country.
Louise Richards
Director of Policy and Campaigns
Institute of Fundraising
1 Dec 2011
Deciding whether or not to accept a donation can be very complex. This example, and the recent case of charities considering whether to accept advertising revenue from the last edition of the News of the World, shows that fundraisers need to bear a range of factors in mind.
The Institute of Fundraising has been working with members to create guidance for fundraisers. This will help them to establish the policies and processes needed to ensure that gifts are accepted in an appropriate manner. This guidance is in its final stages and will be launched to Institute members in Spring 2012.
Alistair Heron
1 Dec 2011
I have to agree with Karl.....It didn't take a genius, or the implementation of a policy, or the rolling out of a model, to figure that accepting a large cheque from Saif Gadaffi might just come back to bite you on the a**e.
And as for the premier league's fit and proper person test, I believe someone once said that Hitler would pass it. This is not a matter of paperwork, it's a matter of sound judgement and people have to take individual as well as collective responsibility.
David Bennett
Head of fundraising
Evangelical Alliance
1 Dec 2011
It’s not just a question of a “fit and proper” person – we need to be aware of any undue influence that might be brought to bear on the charity accepting the donation… add that to money laundering concerns and it makes sense for us all in the sector to start paying more attention before something blows up.
Karl Wilding
1 Dec 2011
Isnt there a perfectly working model in such situations called the smell test? If it smells wrong, dont risk it.
One only needs to look at other industries (premier league football?)where 'fit and proper persons' type self-regulation is in place to know that if your moral compass is wrong, all the self-regulation in the world wont work.
24 May 2012
The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...
24 May 2012
The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...
24 May 2012
The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...
24 May 2012
The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...
24 May 2012
A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...
24 May 2012
Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.
24 May 2012
Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.
24 May 2012
Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.
21 May 2012
Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
19 Nov 2012
Rupa Kotecha Smith
Marketing and Communications Manager
CASE Europe
2 Dec 2011
CASE recommends transparent ethical principles to determine gift acceptance, and welcomes Lord Woolf’s inquiry and recommendations in relation to international donations to the London School of Economics. Although the focus of Lord Woolf's report concerns one UK higher education institution, there are lessons for the entire sector and the fundraising community at large. Case Europe, earlier this year published guidelines about the Ethical Principles Behind the Acceptance of Gifts: http://bit.ly/nZaB9P
[Reply]