Share

Charities urged to review donation policy in light of Woolf report

Charities urged to review donation policy in light of Woolf report
News

Charities urged to review donation policy in light of Woolf report 5

Fundraising | Vibeka Mair | 1 Dec 2011

The director of an ethics training consultancy has encouraged charities to have a good model for checking that a donor is a ‘fit and proper person’, in light of Lord Woolf’s damning inquiry into the London School of Economics' (LSE) donation from Saif Gaddafi's Foundation.

Bernard Ross, director of the Management Centre, made the statement in response to Lord Woolf's report, released yesterday, criticising LSE's procedures for vetting donations which saw the university accepting a donation of £1.5m from Saif Gaddafi's Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation.

Lord Woolf complained that the source of money for the donation was never established by LSE.

“If what the LSE was told by Saif about the source of the donation is taken at face value, the due diligence obtained on the gift should have raised real concerns,” he said.

He continued: “On the available information the source of the donation could have been payments made to gain Saif’s favour. The funding was said to be coming from payments made to Saif’s Foundation by foreign contractors operating in Libya, one of which, according to the due diligence available at the time, had a prior conviction for bribery.

“Why would foreign companies operating in Libya want to donate to the LSE through the conduit of Saif’s Foundation?”

Lord Woolf recommended that LSE adopt an up-to-date policy on donations, as part of its code on ethical and reputational risk.

This donation policy, he said, should include procedures for the scrutiny of proposed donations with clear lines of responsibility and guidelines on the appropriate relationship between the LSE and a donor.

Ross recommends that charities read the report:

“LSE's reputation has been hugely damaged by this - especially internationally. And the same thing has happened to other organisations who have been similarly caught in the past - for example Vilar and the Royal Opera House," he said.

“We, sadly, don't trust many people these days - politicians, sportspeople, journalists, bankers… so charities are one of the few groups who still score high on credibility. We need to protect that as reputation for the whole sector.

“Part of stewardship is checking that the donor is a 'fit and proper person' and that the money has been properly obtained. Unicef have some outstanding guidelines on this and these should be a model for others. This report needs to be widely read.”

Adrian Beney, a fundraising consultant at More Partnerships, who today has written a blog on the issue, adds that the issue of who to accept donations from can be grey:

"I know of a development charity which does not accept donations from arms manufacturers except in serious emergency or a humanitarian disaster, where they accept donations from anybody. It’s the dilemma of turning down money which could save lives."

He added that the LSE had taken the donation at a time when then-Prime Minister Tony Blair had gone to Libya, and the Foreign Office was encouraging ties between the UK and the country.


 

Rupa Kotecha Smith
Marketing and Communications Manager
CASE Europe
2 Dec 2011

CASE recommends transparent ethical principles to determine gift acceptance, and welcomes Lord Woolf’s inquiry and recommendations in relation to international donations to the London School of Economics. Although the focus of Lord Woolf's report concerns one UK higher education institution, there are lessons for the entire sector and the fundraising community at large. Case Europe, earlier this year published guidelines about the Ethical Principles Behind the Acceptance of Gifts: http://bit.ly/nZaB9P

Louise Richards
Director of Policy and Campaigns
Institute of Fundraising
1 Dec 2011

Deciding whether or not to accept a donation can be very complex. This example, and the recent case of charities considering whether to accept advertising revenue from the last edition of the News of the World, shows that fundraisers need to bear a range of factors in mind.

The Institute of Fundraising has been working with members to create guidance for fundraisers. This will help them to establish the policies and processes needed to ensure that gifts are accepted in an appropriate manner. This guidance is in its final stages and will be launched to Institute members in Spring 2012.

Alistair Heron
1 Dec 2011

I have to agree with Karl.....It didn't take a genius, or the implementation of a policy, or the rolling out of a model, to figure that accepting a large cheque from Saif Gadaffi might just come back to bite you on the a**e.

And as for the premier league's fit and proper person test, I believe someone once said that Hitler would pass it. This is not a matter of paperwork, it's a matter of sound judgement and people have to take individual as well as collective responsibility.

David Bennett
Head of fundraising
Evangelical Alliance
1 Dec 2011

It’s not just a question of a “fit and proper” person – we need to be aware of any undue influence that might be brought to bear on the charity accepting the donation… add that to money laundering concerns and it makes sense for us all in the sector to start paying more attention before something blows up.

Karl Wilding
1 Dec 2011

Isnt there a perfectly working model in such situations called the smell test? If it smells wrong, dont risk it.

One only needs to look at other industries (premier league football?)where 'fit and proper persons' type self-regulation is in place to know that if your moral compass is wrong, all the self-regulation in the world wont work.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising