Share

Health Lottery may give more to charity, says its CEO

Health Lottery may give more to charity, says its CEO
News

Health Lottery may give more to charity, says its CEO4

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 24 Nov 2011

The Health Lottery has expanded the lottery market and may divert a greater percentage of its income to good causes, according to its chief executive.

In an exclusive interview with civilsociety.co.uk, the Health Lottery's CEO Martin Hall (pictured), said that the lottery had made £3.6m for good causes in the first six weeks.

Concerns have been raised that the Health Lottery could divert players from the National Lottery, from which a bigger proportion of ticket sales goes to charity, but Hall said the early signs are that this is not the case.

Retailers, said Hall, have indicated that ticket sales to the National Lottery had not been negatively impacted by the new entrant. “They all say there is no negative impact at all,” he said. “We’re adding to the pot.”

He said that criticism of the National Lottery when it launched had been similar to that of the Health Lottery, but that the entry of a new player into the market raises the profile of lotteries generally.

“I understand the fear because we didn’t half appear with a bang. That was our intention: to appear in the marketplace and establish our intention to bring the consumer along with our brand and establish the game first,” he said.

“We’ve been talking to charities and asking whether they’ve seen any negative impact on their [in-house lottery] volumes, they have said no. We asked ‘have you seen positive impact on your volumes?’ ‘Yes’ is the answer.”

Camelot is unconvinced

But Camelot, which operates the National Lottery, is not convinced of the claims that the Health Lottery is expanding the market, noting that it has not released any sales data that refers to the period since the new lottery has been in operation. A spokeswoman for Camelot said that it would be difficult to attribute any spike to the new player because during the period there have been large prize draws which often bring non-regular lottery players into the game.

Camelot also confirmed that it has complained to the Gambling Commission about the Health Lottery, believing that it is not acting as a society lottery.

Hall, however, said that opposition from Camelot was to be expected. “Two and a half years ago we knew the first route that Camelot would take would be a legal challenge,” he said. “We’ve always known that it was coming. I suspect that even if we get a clean bill of health that won’t be the least we’ve heard from Camelot.

“This licence was not granted overnight. It was granted after a great deal of careful consideration to ensure that we’re not only adhering to the law, but to the spirit of the law.”

In a statement Camelot said: “We have co-existed peacefully with society lotteries for many years now and hope to continue to do so in the future. We also welcome fair and vigorous competition. However, we have reservations about any attempt to commercialise society lotteries in ways that appear to cut across the spirit and the letter of both statute and regulation. As custodians of the National Lottery, it is our duty to act in the interests of fairness and the good causes.

“Given the information which has come into the public domain since the Health Lottery’s launch – and in light of the Gambling Commission’s recently-published Advice Note on the operation of society lotteries – we therefore had no option but to write to the Commission detailing the concerns we have about the lawfulness of The Health Lottery and asking it to carry out an immediate review.”

Camelot also said it was concerned about the independence of the 51 community interest companies which work with the Health Lottery, noting that all have the same three directors  and that each CIC has the same registered virtual office. Earlier this week Camelot announced it had raised a record amount in a six-month period, ending 24 September 2011, of just shy of £1bn.

Charity grant interest

At the six-week point, Hall said, more than 2,000 charities had made enquiries to the People’s Health Trust about grants.

“I also understand that we’ve had quite a lot of grant requests from hospices,” he added. The Hospice Lotteries Association in particular had been critical of the structure of the Health Lottery, fearful that it would take players away from small hospice lotteries on which many organisations depend.

Increasing the lottery amount

The new lottery has come under fire for diverting a smaller proportion of ticket sales to charities than the National Lottery, but Hall said that his lottery is constantly reviewing this, and that there could be capacity for increasing the percentage which goes to good causes in the future.

The number of society lotteries involved in the Health Lottery could also expand, Hall said. “We could expand beyond the 51 [current lotteries]. We could open up our retail network to local society lotteries who might be interested in being sold through retailers. That would be a great thing to do with the network.”

He said that the Health Lottery will be looking to innovate beyond the “core game”, and potentially throw its marketing weight behind things like fundraising runs in which runners wear wigs, which are used in the branding of the Health Lottery.

Richard Desmond, media owner and investor in the Health Lottery, said Hall is interested in creating a sustainable source of income for charities and does not expect to receive a commercial return within the first three years.

“Lotteries are difficult,” said Hall. “My message would be, get in touch, talk with us. We’re friendly. We’re nice people.”

Fiona Otter
PR
Lottery.co.uk
16 Dec 2011

Vanessa, a lot of people do complain about it, but the fact is that people and organisations that do get the money - don’t complain at all. As you can see on our web page http://www.lottery.co.uk/health-lottery.asp Health Lottery donates 20p from every single ticket. I think it is better than nothing. Especially when we're talking about million ticket sales all over UK.

Muriel Simmons
Allergy UK
24 Nov 2011

I couldn't agree more with Vanessa re the use of the national lottery money going to the NHS. However I think that ensuring that the money actually went to front line services would be difficult. I worked in the NHS for 20 years raising funds and the only way to ensure that the money went where it was needed was to establish a dedicated charitable fund that was legally ring fenced aainst deficit raids. It didn't make for popularity with the establishment but it did deliver what the front line staff wanted.
I agree that Camelot should stop whining and face healthy competition as other businesses have to.

Vanessa Eden
Head of Fundraising
RSPCA
24 Nov 2011

In my opinion and that of the vast majority of my colleagues is when the National Lottery was firsy introduced, all proceeds should have gone to the National Health to be used to improve the service. Just think how cutting edge the NHS would be now with all the money being pumped into it by partcipants in the lottery. Especially, if it actually went to services and not to pay the high salaries of some of the staff, i.e. NHS Consultants who also receive fat cheques doing private work. The roll over jackpots are obscene in the amounts being offered and again these could be reduced and used for the NHS. As for Camelot whinging, what's new? It's about time Camelot released their monopoly on the National Lottery and gave other organisers a chance.

Gerald Jones
retired
3 Jan 2012
Response to [Vanessa Eden]

I agree with Vanessa in part, also think the National Lottery is certainly not used properly and should NOT hand out monies to rediculous causes.

Should be overviewed by sensible people who live in the real world .

Maybe a prize for anyone who fails to get 1(one) number correct.

Mystery to me how just one person out of millions has a different set of numbers to anyone else and also how this is chosen as the the winner.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Specialist Work Programme providers should get more funding for new services, say MPs

21 May 2013

The Department for Work and Pensions should use some of the money it has saved on outcome payments in...

Commission reissues business rate relief warning

21 May 2013

The Charity Commission has reissued an alert for charities about the risks of entering tenancy agreements...

Government to provide support to charities bidding for rehabilitation contracts

21 May 2013

The Cabinet Office and the Ministry of Justice plan to develop a tool which will help charities and social...

Welsh representative to join Charity Commission board

22 May 2013

A Welsh representative has been appointed to join the six new Charity Commission board members announced...

Commission moots indicating FRSB membership on charity register

22 May 2013

Charities’ membership or non-membership of the Fundraising Standards Board could be included on the...

Birkbeck University to end voluntary and community studies course

22 May 2013

Birkbeck University of London has come under fire over plans to close its Masters course in Voluntary...

Age UK and London Zoo on shortlist for £2m Google charity competition

22 May 2013

Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising