FT exposes retailers paying charities to avoid business rates 1

Fundraising | Vibeka Mair | 22 Nov 2011

The Charity Commission is investigating whether the practice of hard-up retailers reducing their business rates liabilities by paying charities to sign tenancies for empty shops, is a matter of regulatory concern.

The practice, which has been brought to light following an investigation by the Financial Times, allegedly sees charities getting donations in return for signing tenancy agreements on hard-to-let shops.

The Financial Times reports that for the owners of empty shops, the donations are a cheaper alternative than paying for the business rates that would be due on empty properties under government legislation brought in this April.

A spokesman for the Department for Communities and Local Government told the FT that this is a form of tax evasion: “Business-rate discounts for charities are well-established and reflect the wider public benefit that charities provide to society. But councils should take firm steps to investigate and stop tax evasion by bodies exploiting these tax breaks.”

The FT named two retailers who confirmed they had made donations to charities in return for them occupying empty shops but did not name any charities.

The Charity Commission said it would be determining whether charity trustees were making the right decision if they occupy a property for payment.

"The Charity Commission has been made aware of registered charities claiming that they occupy empty commercial premises and then claiming business rates relief from local authorities," said a spokeswoman. "In some cases landlords or property companies are approaching charities in order to enter into agreements to occupy premises. The landlord or company benefits through the avoidance of payments of business rates.

"We are currently considering these issues to determine whether there are any regulatory concerns for the Commission.

"As the regulator of charities our concerns, should we have any, will be whether charity trustees are making proper decisions to occupy property to further their charitable purposes, and that any benefit to the landlord is incidental to that."

A Charity Retail Association spokeswoman told civilsociety.co.uk it had heard no reports from its members about the practice. But it will consider the matter if the Charity Commission decides to issue guidance.

Directory: Charity Commission | Charity Retail Association

Place a comment

Chris Zealley
Charity Trusteeships various
23 Nov 2011

I cannot see the difficulty and agree with the comments from the CC.

If a charity shop is genuinely for the charity's benefit, the local authorites' rate relief to the landlord is analogous to higher rate taxpayers being able to donate to charities and thereby reduce their higher-rate taxable income.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.