Share

Abolish Edited Electoral Register in three years, says report

Abolish Edited Electoral Register in three years, says report
News

Abolish Edited Electoral Register in three years, says report

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 7 Nov 2011

Politicians have called for the accelerated abolition of the Edited Electoral Register by 2014-2015, but fundraisers are concerned it could leave them without a way to check the details of potentially valuable direct mail supporters.

The Institute of Fundraising has expressed alarm at a report by the Select Committee for Political and Constitutional Reform released on Friday. The organisation fears it could undermine charities’ ability to check their data for direct marketing campaigns.

The report, which is a response to the draft bill on Individual Electoral Registration, proposes the current registration system be replaced by one in which individual voters register, a likelihood floated nearly a decade ago but one which will likely be sped up by the passing of the bill.  

Individual voter registration as a concept enjoys bipartisan support. It was first mooted under the previous Labour government and the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition have expressed eagerness to get the reforms into place soon. “The principle of moving to individual electoral registration is widely accepted. It was first recommended by the Electoral Commission in 2003 and subsequently by the Committee on Standards in Public Life in 2007,” the report reads.

The Institute of Fundraising has been campaigning against this move, and its policy advisory board chair Mike Wade spoke out on Friday. “It is important that charities continue to have access to the Edited Electoral Register,” said Wade, also director of fundraising and communications at the National Deaf Children’s Society.

“The data it holds enables charities to fundraise more effectively. Charities are able to verify the information they hold on their databases and improve the accuracy of their mailings. This helps to cut down the volume of unwanted mail sent by charities, ensuring the maximum amount can go to the charity’s work.”

The government estimates the cost of changing the system at £108.3m. The commitee heard its final evidence session on the subject in mid-October.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

RNIB chief executive criticises ‘arrogance’ of MPs who think charities must learn from private sector

21 Nov 2014

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, yesterday said she had a “struggle with the arrogance”...

Property boom poses risk to charities' long-term survival, survey reports

20 Nov 2014

Nearly half of charities consider property the greatest risk to their long-term survival, according to...

A quarter of charities 'ignore Commission action plans'

19 Nov 2014

Around one in four charities that the Charity Commission issued action plans to last year either partially...

RNIB chief executive criticises ‘arrogance’ of MPs who think charities must learn from private sector

21 Nov 2014

Lesley-Anne Alexander, chief executive of RNIB, yesterday said she had a “struggle with the arrogance”...

Don't lecture us on impact when government has failed to measure its own, Wilson told

21 Nov 2014

The minister for civil society was criticised yesterday for telling charities to measure their impact...

Volunteer managers say they need a stronger representative body

21 Nov 2014

The volunteering sector needs a more powerful representative body, volunteer managers have said in response...

OSCR launches new website

20 Nov 2014

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator has launched a new website which includes a new search function.

Data from controversial Samaritans app to be deleted

17 Nov 2014

Samaritans has promised that all data collected by its Twitter monitoring app will be deleted and the...

Post Office enables Children in Need donations through Twitter

11 Nov 2014

The Post Office has become the first UK organisation to allow Twitter users to donate to charity through...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising