Third Sector Knowledge Portal is backed by BIG funding 1

Fundraising | Tania Mason | 17 Oct 2011

The Big Lottery Fund has awarded £200,000 to the Third Sector Research Centre to create a new website that signposts visitors to various research reports that have been written about the voluntary sector.

The Third Sector Knowledge Portal has been built in partnership with the British Library and is billed as a "one-stop knowledge resource" containing evidence and links to others' evidence on a range of subjects relevant to the sector.

These include academic research, reports from charities themselves, government publications and training materials. Material will be freely downloadable if in electronic format and provided access is not restricted by the publisher.

The site, which launched on Friday, will also enable third parties to share and preserve their research and the Centre is encouraging organisations to deposit their work on the Portal. Pete Alcock, director of the Centre, said: "This Portal will make it easier for people to find and use the wide range of research resources on the sector."

Thr Big Lottery Fund has funded the Knowledge Portal as part of the learning strand of Replication and Innovation, a new UK-wide funding programme that aims to target deep-rooted social problems.

Big Lottery Fund CEO Peter Wanless added: "The sector is not short of evidence reviews, research or information but it is often fragmented and difficult to access.

"BIG is convinced that many of the solutions to deep-rooted social problems can be found in sharing and building on existing effective practice. A resource such as this is key to bringing about long-lasting positive changes to those most in need."

The Portal is the second sector-facing website that BIG has funded recently. Three years ago it ploughed £2.2m into KnowHow NonProfit, which described itself as "a useful, practical resource with links to other sources of information and help”. It was subsumed within the NCVO in July after its funding ran out.

Directory: Big Lottery Fund
Who's Who: Peter Wanless

Place a comment

Stephen Lulsley
Independent Commentator and Consultant
17 Oct 2011

What a disgraceful waste of money. The Big Lottery Fund would be far better spending it on something beneficial to a needy group.

What a travesty of the principle of lottery being about raising money for good causes.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.