Share

FRSB rules charity should not refund no-show event participant

Childreach International supporters on Kilimanjaro Trek
News

FRSB rules charity should not refund no-show event participant 1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 10 Oct 2011

The FRSB has sided with a children’s charity after it refused to give a refund to a supporter who decided not to participate in its Kilimanjaro challenge event.

A complaint was lodged against Childreach International by a person who had signed up and paid a deposit for the charity’s Climb Kilimanjaro for Kids event. The individual had been unable to complete the event due to a rescheduling of dates and because they did not raise the agreed amount of money (£2,440).

But Childreach International successfully defended its position at the FRSB stage three adjudication, outlining that, at the time of rescheduling the event, the charity had written to participants offering a refund of the deposit – an offer the complainant did not take up at the time. When the individual cancelled their participation some months later, the charity also gave them the chance to defer their deposit for the following year’s event. While the complainant’s sponsors were happy for the charity to keep the £1,729 raised, the would-be mountain climber wanted their £220 deposit back.

FRSB chair Colin Lloyd said that the charity had been “reasonable” with the complainant at all stages, and that the terms and conditions of the event were made clear from the outset.

Lloyd said that responsibility for being aware of the terms and conditions clearly lies with the event participants. “This highlights the importance of participants thoroughly reading through their obligations before signing on the dotted line,” he said.

A spokeswoman for Childreach International welcomed the FRSB’s findings. “We are pleased with the result. We work with the upmost care to uphold the guidelines set out by the FRSB and ensure all of our fundraising standards meet their requirements,” she said.

Carl Allen
10 Oct 2011

On this notable judgement, now let none in future complain for charity and volunteer fairness was not a detail or principle in the contract.

And fare thee well to the principle of cost recovery as it is no more.

TOP TIP A volunteer cannot be a party to a contract.

But my question ... should the FRSB have offered mediation and not adjudication?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

Twitter button

@CSFundraising