Some British Red Cross fundraisers paid below minimum wage

Fundraising | Kirsty Weakley | 4 Oct 2011

A BBC Panorama programme aired last night has exposed how a Scottish marketing company used by the British Red Cross exploited an employment loophole to pay street fundraisers below the minimum wage.

Glasgow-based Smiths Marketing Associates were hiring people on a self-employed contract where they were only paid commission. This meant that fundraisers could be taking home less than the national minimum wage.

Matthew Parkes, a graduate who worked for Smiths Marketing Associates told Panorama that he had been working 70-hour weeks and earning around £200 pounds, averaging out at £2.85 per hour.

Under-cover filming of the interview process also showed the interviewer being vague about the salary and the interviewee being asked to undertake a day's unpaid work for the company.

Red Cross responds

Mark Astarita, director of fundraising at the British Red Cross, said: “We are concerned by the material which has emerged and we are thoroughly investigating why Smiths Marketing Associates did not give greater clarity from the outset.”

He added: “We expect all the agencies we work with to be transparent at all times in their recruitment processes and are very grateful to the BBC for bringing the issue to our attention.”

The British Red Cross said that it uses multiple agencies for doorstep and street fundraising including Smiths.

Last April the Advertising Standards Authority upheld a complaint against Smiths Marketing Associates about a job advert for trainee marketing positions because the listing did not make it clear that it was a self-employed opportunity.

This morning Smiths' own website was unavailable but it is still possible to apply for self-employed trainee marketing roles through various job sites.

Smiths Marketing Associates refused to comment on the issues raised or whether it had changed any of their processes.

Directory: British Red Cross
Who's Who: Mark Astarita

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.