Only four MPs donate through payroll giving

MPs in the House of Commons

Only four MPs donate through payroll giving 7

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 30 Sep 2011

Just four MPs donate to charity via their payroll even though the mechanism has been touted by government as a good way to boost giving overall.

In response to a Freedom of Information request by, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) revealed that four un-named members of parliament donate to charity via the Give As You Earn scheme. There are 650 MPs in parliament, which means just 0.6 per cent of MPs give via the scheme.

The IPSA emphasised that this did not account for the entirety of MPs' philanthropy, only what they donated via payroll giving.

The government has repeatedly cited increasing payroll giving as an opportunity to boost giving as a whole. At the Institute of Fundraising’s payroll giving conference in June, held at the Home Office itself, economic secretary to the Treasury Justine Greening reaffirmed the government’s commitment to trying to make payroll giving the norm

“Payroll giving is a huge opportunity that almost needs to be dusted off and looked at again fresh,” she said.

The Cabinet Office expressed particular enthusiasm for payroll giving in the Giving White Paper, in which it also announced plans to launch a national campaign this autumn to promote payroll giving to employers.

This top-line support is yet further cemented by the fact that this year, for the first time, the annual Payroll Giving Awards will be held at Number 11 Downing Street.

In a statement in response to the revelation, the Institute of Fundraising said: “The key thing here is for individuals to keep on giving to charity, irrespective of the channels they choose to make donations.”

Elena Joseph
Workplace Giving UK
3 Oct 2011

Phiip Carver is correct in essence, however, how a person donates to charity is important. Charities still lose £millions every year through inefficient giving - not ticking a Gift Aid box or not giving via pay etc.

Giving via pay is the only automatic way for a higher rate tax payer to donate 40% extra automatically and, as all MPs are higher rate tax payers, this would be an ideal way for them to give any regular donations they may wish to give. I really believe that this is a case of lack of awareness of the scheme among MPs - as it is for many employees within companies operating a scheme but with a low uptake.

30 Sep 2011

Ho, ho, ho - typical !

Philip Carver
30 Sep 2011

Surely this is an irrelevant fact.

The issue is 'Do they donate?'. How they do is irrelevant and, frankly, nobody else's business as is how much they donate and to whom.

Payroll giving, from my experience both as employer and employee, is not the simple system it is cracked up to be.

3 Oct 2011
Response to [Philip Carver]

Whilst I agree with your point (somewhat), I still believe that we can use the lack of belief / use of the system as a proxy for an assumed lack of overall willingness to donate to charities since I do not believe we are privy or will ever be privy to total cash £value donated.

Finally, even if we were it would, then it would be required to be put into context in terms of a percentage of total annual income and also in terms of total net worth.

Elena Joseph
Workplace Giving UK
4 Oct 2011
Response to [Bob]

Not sure where you are getting your information from Bob but I think it is rather a big step to assume that because MPs do not use their payroll giving scheme that they are not giving at all?

30 Sep 2011

They'll probably qualify for a Silver award and certificate of excellence..

Rarry Revan
30 Sep 2011

So let's get this straight then:

The Government who are in charge of the country are full of hot air and unwilling to lead by example, the Institute of Fundraising are unwilling to put their money where their mouth is (sorry the Government's money, sorry the taxpayer's money given to them to promote payroll giving) and are also unwilling to take a lead on sorting out Payroll Giving.

I know! Why don't we rehash the same old comments about leadership and opportunity for the next ten years? It seems to have worked for the last decade...


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

CTG attacks HMRC for breaking promises over implementation of 20 per cent tax on direct mail

16 Apr 2015

Charities have been left unsure how to obey tax rules after HM Revenue & Customs failed to publish...

NCVO and CFG express concerns over government review of business rates

13 Apr 2015

Infrastructure bodies including NCVO and the Charity Finance Group are consulting charities over a government...

Grant-makers face 'big decisions' as a result of 'seismic shift' in commissioning, says report

9 Apr 2015

Charities and funders face big decisions after a “seismic shift” in public service commissioning,...

National Theatre's first chief executive quits citing problems with leadership structure

17 Apr 2015

The National Theatre's first chief executive, Tessa Ross, has resigned after five months at the organisation,...

Legion condemns poppy use on Ukip campaign advert

17 Apr 2015

The Royal British Legion has said that it is working to make sure that its poppy is “never again”...

MoJ stops short of formal investigation into PCC who awarded £500,000 to her own organisation

17 Apr 2015

The Ministry of Justice has said it is not launching a formal investigation into Northumbria police and...

Oxfam trials tap-to-donate technology

17 Apr 2015

Oxfam GB is running a trial of near-field communication technology to allow supporters to both donate...

Ice Bucket Challenge effect brings down average online donation amount

15 Apr 2015

The average online donation fell by 8.6 per cent in 2014 to £63.69, according to a survey by fundraising...

Education charity UCAS broke electronic marketing rules, says Information Commissioner

9 Apr 2015

The Universities and Colleges Admissions Service broke electronic marketing rules because its admission...

Join the discussion

Twitter button