Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes
24 May 2012
The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...
Royal Mail figures released to civilsociety.co.uk show for the first time the extent to which some charity donors are being bombarded with mail by organisations keen to win or retain their support over the busy Christmas and New Year period.
Information about charity direct mailings from September 2010 to February 2011 has been shared with civilsociety.co.uk and show that there is a huge amount of cross-over between the mailing files of charities with large direct mail programmes.
A Royal Mail spokesman said the statistics do not suggest that charities are actively targeting donors of other charities, "rather that they are mailing people they feel are most likely to respond.”
"Royal Mail sponsors a panel of consumers who provide information on their shopping habits as well as other behaviours, including which charities they donate to. We then monitor what mail they receive. This information is very useful to our customers. The statistics for the charity sector show that mail campaigns are seen as a popular and effective way of attracting new donors."
Cancer Research UK, probably the biggest direct mail player in the charity market, has the highest number of other charities mailing the supporters on its own mail list. In total, over these six months, more than 33 million pieces of charity mail from other charities were sent to individuals who also receive mail from Cancer Research UK.
Seven different charities each mailed more than one million Cancer Research UK supporters over that period, with the top mailers being Smile Train (mailed 1.54m CRUK supporters), and the Royal British Legion (1.34m). A further 32 charities mailed between 200,000 and one million CRUK donors over this peak period.
This level of cross-over between CRUK and other mailing lists in the September to February period is significant given that the charity pulled out of Reciprocate, a donor data-sharing service, in June 2010 and charities that were owed donor data from CRUK had to mail those donors by October.
British Heart Foundation also had a high level of cross-over between its supporters and supporters mailed by other charities. More than 16 million pieces of mail went to BHF mail recipients from other charities between September and February. Twenty-four charities each sent more than 200,000 pieces of mail to supporters on the BHF mailing list and over the six-month period just over 16.1 million pieces of charity mail were received by people also receiving BHF mail.
While there is a high cross-over of donors with charities within the same causal area – for example, 732,651 pieces of British Red Cross mail were sent to individuals who also got mail from Christian Aid – supporters are also receiving mailings from charities with vastly different aims and beneficiaries.
Royal British Legion’s supporter base is also heavily tapped by other charities, with 14 different organisations each sending more than 200,000 mailings to RBL supporters over the September-February period.
This level of cross-mailing would support the complaints results published by the Fundraising Standards Board a few months ago, which recorded more than 146,000 complaints about direct mail, with the chief concerns of complainants being poor data and the frequency of appeals.
The top mailer of supporters on the Barnardo’s list, as with CRUK, Cats Protection, RNLI, National Trust, Marie Curie Cancer Care and BHF, was Smile Train. According to the Royal Mail figures, Smile Train mailed 865,138 BHF mail recipients, 731,850 National Trust supporters, 502,269 Marie Curie Cancer Care supporters, 455,564 RNLI supporters, 399,316 Barnardo’s supporters, 308,304 Salvation Army supporters, and 278,351 RSPCA supporters among thousands of others during that six-month period.
The following is a list, according to Royal Mail figures from September 2010 to February 2011, of the number of mailings sent to supporters of these charities from other charities.
Peter Munro
18 Jul 2011
Maybe I'm being naive, but all the charities to which I've given in the past 10 years either had a printed promise saying that my details would not be sold, exchanged or passed to any other organisation, or had a tick box offering me the opportunity not to have my details treated in this way, and I've always ticked.
If this has gone by the wayside, then not only is this a clear breach of Data Protection, but it's a failure of such charities in their respect to me as a donor.
I don't like that.
Nigel Edward-Few
CEO
JUBILEE ACTION
15 Jul 2011
Our supporters can rest assured that, on my watch, their details will not be sold, loaned or supplied to any other organisation.
Catherine Clark
Head of Communications, Marketing & Development
Royal School of Church Music
15 Jul 2011
That is a .1 -- 1/10th of 1% -- complaint rate. Multiply that by the 10 people who sat there and simmered, and it's still a remarkably low 1%.
Charities have to mail or die. And donors who have given up on one charity should be given an opportunity to feel good by giving to another that more closely matches their interests. As a matter of first principles, charities must keep their data up-to-date and to abide by donors' wishes concerning exchanging. The RSCM does not do exchanges but we are considering reciprocal appeals. We need more positive support to do this from our professional bodies!
Stolen
18 Jul 2011
Response to [Catherine Clark]
Please die.
Rarry Revan
Ranter
Rantingrules
15 Jul 2011
http://www.occam-dm.com/reciprocate/
Interetingly, CRUK pulled out of Reciprocate last Autumn
Rarry
Patrick Manion
Principle Consultant
Sun King Enterprises
15 Jul 2011
You can ask your charity to adjust your donor file to read "do not share" meaning do not sell or share or swap your information. Most databases can handle such a supression.
Carl Allen
15 Jul 2011
Response to [Patrick Manion]
This is the charity sector, not the commercial sector where dodgy practices are often foisted on consumers.
Charities should have to ask permission to sell, share or swap. The individual donor should not have to specify.
24 May 2012
The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...
24 May 2012
The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...
24 May 2012
The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...
24 May 2012
The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...
24 May 2012
A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...
24 May 2012
Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.
24 May 2012
Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.
24 May 2012
Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.
21 May 2012
Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
19 Nov 2012
Edel
19 Jul 2011
People who donate to charity generally donate to more than one, usually up to 7 or 8.
No charity "owns" these donors, they share them.
[Reply]