Share

Storm clouds on NHS funding horizon

Storm clouds on NHS funding horizon
Blogs

Storm clouds on NHS funding horizon 1

Fundraising | Daniel Fletcher | 3 Dec 2009

The last month of the Noughties is looking to leave health charities in a high degree of uncertainty, despite positive indications that the recession is unlikely to get any worse.

One storm cloud on the horizon relates to NHS and statutory funding. The facts seem reasonably clear. A report from The King’s Fund and Institute for Fiscal Studies in July  demonstrated that the NHS would need to find £20 billion in savings from 2011-2014 in order to simply standstill. Half of charity funding comes from the statutory sector, some as contractual income from the NHS. A reduced NHS budget is bad news for charities.

A further blow was made in September when the health secretary, Andy Burnham, announced that preferred bidders for NHS funding would be other NHS bodies rather than “any willing providers” from other sectors, such as charities. This has gone on to cause growing concern from charities, resulting in a recent letter from ACEVO’s Stephen Bubb to the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, suggesting that charities could be the solution to cost savings and productivity improvements. Although this does miss the point about the priority of safe-guarding NHS jobs and appeasing health care workers’ unions for a health secretary.

This week, The King’s Fund released another report, Windmill 2009. The NHS response to the financial storm. Representatives from across the health economy spent a day in July working through scenarios of impending financial doom, and their behaviours and actions were analysed in the report to identify what should, and shouldn’t happen, when these scenarios become more like reality.

One recommendation is that NHS “Commissioners and providers need to grasp opportunities to work with the independent and third sectors, where these can make a contribution to innovation and improvement.” To do this, commissioners need to be more explicit about what they are trying to solve and the outcomes they want, rather than simply specifying the outputs, i.e. the products and services they need.

In return, independent and voluntary sector suppliers should find ways to help risk-averse commissioners handle some of the risks, and the challenges of implementation associated with commissioning new services.

The big question is whether this would or could happen? Instead, do health and social care charities need to see the writing on the wall, and batten down the hatches, to mix my metaphors?

Job losses and reorganisations will be on the way, such as those already taking place at Diabetes UK and Arthritis Care. Or, is this an opportunity to rely less on statutory funding, and invest in diversifying into more fundraising approaches as some parts of the economy grow in financial confidence.

Anonymous

Anonymous
10 Dec 2009

My organisation, which works in rehabilitation, is absolutely terrified about these cuts. We are fairly sure our regular statutory funding will be ending sometime soon - but we are trying to talk to our regular commissioners, get constant information and see where we can work with them.

For some of us, there is simply no possibility of getting funding for these projects elsewhere - but we would not be doing some of those projects in the first place had there not been govt money on the table.

Maybe it will force charities to really consider what their priorities are - and not just what the funding is for?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.