Share

Fundraisers must stop treating the wealthy with suspicion

V&A Museum
Blogs

Fundraisers must stop treating the wealthy with suspicion

Fundraising | Adrian Beney | 11 Mar 2011

Fundraisers from traditional charities need to re-think their approach to  major donor fundraising, and the wealthy in general, if they are to attract the kinds of major gifts that the arts and higher education enjoy, says Adrian Beney

In Fundraising’s March Agent Provocateur Mark Astarita, director of fundraising at the British Red Cross, wrote about his concern about the matched funding schemes which have been in operation in the higher education sector, and are now starting in the arts sector, arguing that it may be unfair that charities no longer face a level playing field.  

I would say, wouldn't it be great if there were some matched funding scheme for the non-higher education, non-arts sector, especially if it was aimed specifically at raising major gifts? But that’s to miss the point.  Mark argues that because of their wealthier prospect pools, these two sectors already have an inbuilt advantage.  I disagree.

I would argue that, well expressed, much of the charity sector has an inbuilt advantage. Why? Because its case for support is usually so much simpler. Mark suggests that education and the arts have an advantage over cancer, children and overseas aid charities.  But universities are doing cancer, children and overseas development work. Donors are funding work in micro-biology, in centres to look at better organisation of social work, and (in the case of someone I met today) in research on predicting where the world’s next flash points might be, and how to change social, political and economic circumstances there in order to resolve conflict before it happens.  These are all closely related to the work of, say, Cancer Research UK, Action for Children and the Red Cross.

At the recent Institute of Fundraising conference on major gifts, I was surprised to hear how reluctant are some chief execs and trustees to engage with donors and to allow them to speak into the life of the charity. (And I know I am writing this against the background of the furore over LSE and Libya.)  

But until the sector stops viewing wealthy people with suspicion, and starts instead to embrace their wisdom and interest as well as their money, the gap in major gifts between the HE and arts sector and the rest of the not-for-profit world will remain.  On the other hand, if the “conventional” charity sector gets really serious about this work – and the 180 delegates at the IoF Conference suggests that it might be – then the HE and Arts sectors will have some real competition on their hands.  Bring it on!

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Adrian Beney

Adrian Beney is a director of More Partnership and has been in fundraising for nearly 25 years. He is a trustee of three charities - two grantmakers and one grant seeker.

Follow Adrian on Twitter @adrianbeney 

Celina Ribeiro (37) Niki May Young (22) Kirsty Weakley (16) Jenna Pudelek (9) Michael Naidu (7) Andrew Chaggar (7) David Philpott (7) Leon Ward (7) Emily Corfe (7) Tobin Aldrich (6) Less +++ More +++

Banking blog: Three charities and their experience of loan finance

29 Jul 2015

Carolyn Sims, head of banking at Charity Bank, shares useful case studies of charities that have taken...

Ten things charities can do to build financial sustainability

22 Jul 2015

A financial review published today warns that the sector faces a £4.6bn shortfall. Michael Birtwistle,...

All charity leaders are responsible for fundraising

14 Jul 2015

The tragic death of Olive Cooke was a defining moment for the sector and everyone involved in running...

Why we became a living wage employer

23 Jul 2015

Two Joseph Rowntree charities jointly became the first care provider to pay staff the living wage, and...

RSPB doesn't do conservation? That's just ill-informed drivel

22 Jul 2015

The minister for civil society has made some welcome statements on charity campaigning, says Andrew Purkis,...

What has economics got to do with perinatal depression?

14 Jul 2015

Andrea Lee explains how, despite not knowing much about the specific issues, she was able to bring her...