Share

Twenty years of integration

Twenty years of integration
Blogs

Twenty years of integration

Fundraising | John Tate | 24 Apr 2009

The web puts integration back on the agenda, says John Tate.

Twenty years ago I left my job as a finance director in the commercial sector and set up an IT business. 1989 was the start of perhaps the last recession. Early clients in my IT business included organisations in the charity sector.

Back then IT investment had the capacity to offer quick wins, based in the main on PC technology. Parts of the finance function were often still processing work manually. A quick return on investment could be made by installing a PC-based system to automate much of this work. A product like Lotus could be installed and in use in a few hours. Benefits could be immediate. Characteristics of quick-win projects were situations where individual users or single departments could adopt new technology without the need for widespread organisational change.

As individual or departmental systems were improved the 1990s saw the growth of ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems. Led by SAP at the high end of the market, vendors promised a single product that would offer an ‘end to end’ business solution to allow all departments to work with a single transac-tion processing system. This led to a trouble-some period in IT adoption. Organisations struggled and usually failed to manage the change required to get departments to work together in a new way. Widespread ERP implementation failure followed. The char-ity sector was not immune and many larger projects to develop integrated systems failed to deliver the anticipated benefits

This issue of Charity Finance includes the 2009 IT survey. In light of the current finan-cial environment the results are worth careful review. The ratings give cause for concern. Overall, about 40 per cent of organisations state their IT systems are average to poor. With technology playing a critical role in most charities, the underperformance of IT must be an area to focus attention.

In 1989 it was PC technology that gave us a step-change in our use of IT. Step forward to 2009 and it is the internet and widespread use of broadband/mobile connectivity that offers the greatest reward. Examples of this are remote connectivity allowing people to work from home or mobile working. The next level of benefit will come mainly from different departments working together in new ways with this technology.

Looking at more of the survey results, effi-ciency of business processes gets the lowest rating in terms of IT performance with some 50 per cent rating their systems as average to poor. My recent experience of working with charities certainly supports these find-ings. All too often the different transaction processing systems are not integrated, for example fundraising/membership/events/finance. Information needs to be re-keyed several times. This delays the availability of up-to-date information, requires additional staff and cost to do this work and creates the potential for error each time the data is re-keyed. Vendors are again touting ‘end to end’ solutions such as CRM (Customer Relationship Management) applications.

In previous articles, I have commented on research work from the US that suggests there can be up to a threefold difference in finance/IT costs for similar organisations, depending on whether they have a well run or poor finance/IT function. So the cost sav-ings are significant if you can get IT right.

With the development of web technology, most information can be captured at source and automatically fed into the different trans-action processing systems. The internet also gives staff and external stakeholders access to information ‘anytime, anyplace, anywhere’.

Are there signs this time we can manage the change to make this happen? Looking again at the survey, CEOs are taking an increased interest in IT and 70 per cent of boards have at least one trustee with IT knowledge. Wide-scale change really does need support from the top so this is encouraging.

Over 80 per cent of IT consultants, when used, offer value for money. However out-sourcing mainstream IT functions still has issues with 35 per cent of charities rating the service as average to poor. In the end you still need to own IT – and the buck stops with you to make change happen.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

John Tate

John Tate is a qualified accountant and has over 20 years working in the IT industry. He is also a columnist for Charity Finance, IT advisor to CFG and a lecturer at Cass.

Celina Ribeiro (94) Niki May Young (36) Jonathon Grapsas (30) Michael Naidu (23) Adrian Beney (20) Andrew Scadding (20) Kirsty Weakley (18) Andrew Chaggar (17) Vibeka Mair (15) Jonathan Waddingham (15)
Suzie Who (15) David Philpott (14) Robert Ashton (12) Tania Mason (11) Daniel Fletcher (9) David Burrows (8) Alistair McLean (7) Gareth Jones (6) Beth Yorath (6) Leon Ward (6) Jenna Pudelek (6) Stephen Pidgeon (5) Reuben Turner (5) Rowena Lewis (5) Tobin Aldrich (5) Mark Astarita (4) Lucy Caldicott (4) Tony Elischer (4) Joe Saxton (4) Tod Norman (4) Ian Clark (4) David Ainsworth (4) Alan Gosschalk (3) Richard Radcliffe (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Gordon Hunter (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Lisa Clavering (3) Adam Rothwell (2) Beth Breeze (2) Matthew Bowcock (2) Tris Lumley (2) John Tate (2) Garreth Spillane (2) Liz Tait (2) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (2) Allan Freeman (2) Claire Routley (2) Lindsay Boswell (1) Victoria Cook (1) David Davison (1) Bill Lewis (1) Giles Pegram (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Derek Humphries (1) Alan Clayton (1) Cathy Pharoah (1) Stephen George (1) Gordon Michie (1) Chris Ingram (1) Martin Farrell (1) Morag Fleming (1) Matt Goody (1) Ian MacQuillin (1) Paul Farthing (1) Jackie Mendoza (1) Max Du Bois (1) Alan Hawkes (1) Ken Burnett (1) Ian Allsop (1) Martin Brookes (1) Tesse Akpeki (1) Anne Moynihan (1) Sara Llewellin (1) Rupert Tappin (1) Julia Unwin (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Scott Gray (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) Keith Collins (1) Joe Jenkins (1) Peter O'Hara (1) Debbie Attwood (1) Joanna Motion (1) Paul Marvell (1) Amanda McLean (1) Jason Suckley (1) Paul Amadi (1) Imogen Ward (1) June O'Sullivan (1) Kath Abrahams (1) Peter Lewis (1) Dan Corry (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Belinda Pratten (1) Jonathan Last (1) Jenni Cahill (1) Paul Emery (1) Marcelle Speller (1) Nick Aldridge (1) Philip Spedding (1) Tom Latchford (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Lucy Gower (1) Jeff Brooks (1) Vicki Prout (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Dan Thompson (1) Steven George-Hilley (1) Emma-Lynn Houghton (1) Peter Horah (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) George Matafonov (1) Marcus Missen (1) Denise Lillya (1) Alice Sharman (1) Jaz Nannar (1) Ali Stunt (1) Robin Fisk (1) Gillian Claugher (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Emma Callagher (1)
Less +++ More +++

It's time for the sector to front up and prove it has nothing to hide

19 Aug 2014

The sector's representative bodies must be bolder in telling the Charity Commission what they think of...

The Big Society Network saga needs further digging

25 Jul 2014

Richard Caulfield was suspicious about the independence of Big Society Network way back in 2010.

You’ve got a (critical) friend

25 Jul 2014

The new £40m Sustainability Fund ought to allocate some money to expert intermediaries so they can help...

Too much focus on reputational risk?

28 Aug 2014

Dorothy Dalton wonders if trustees are too focused on reputational risk?

It's time for the sector to front up and prove it has nothing to hide

19 Aug 2014

The sector's representative bodies must be bolder in telling the Charity Commission what they think of...

Film of the week: OneMinuteJr by Unicef Ukraine

15 Aug 2014

Unicef Ukraine has released a series of one minute videos created by children caught up in the conflict...

Free eNews