Share

Time for fundraising and charity organisations to merge?

Time for fundraising and charity organisations to merge?
Blogs

Time for fundraising and charity organisations to merge? 5

Fundraising | Paul Amadi | 3 Jun 2011

Does the charity sector need quite so many bodies representing and regulating its activities? Paul Amadi thinks not.

During my five years as a trustee of the Institute of Fundraising, the latter two as chairman, a regular item on the board agenda was our relationship with other sector bodies.

Typically (and appropriately), the debate would be about how we could work collaboratively with our colleagues at the Public Fundraising Regulatory Association, the Fundraising Standards Board and others. But when I look back on these debates now, particularly from the perspective of a director of fundraising with a squeezed budget and an expectation of utmost efficiency in our use of our supporters’ money, I wonder whether it’s not now time for the sector to start asking itself some overdue questions about whether our regulatory framework is still fit for purpose.

This year the NSPCC will pay subscriptions to the IoF, the FRSB, pay a charge per donor to the PFRA and technically, as we have a small number of shops, we should be members of the Charity Retail Association. In total, we’ll pay out close to £100,000 of our supporters’ money to the organisations above and I’m sure other large charities face similar bills.

Surely the time has come to ask: is this sustainable, is this is right and how would donors feel about this if they knew? Is it not time we had a grown-up and transparent debate about whether this is working for everybody outside of these organisations?

Should there not be a dialogue about whether the PFRA and the Charity Retail Association should and could merge with the Institute of Fundraising? Undeniably each body has a job to do but could it be done more efficiently in a merged body?

The same question could be applied to the FRSB, whose self-regulatory function could arguably be recreated by the IoF. On cost grounds alone there are compelling reasons to explore this as an option. In 2009, according to it’s annual report, only 19 of all the complaints received by the FRSB were dealt with at an official level, and of those none went to board adjudication. Which, given the annual running costs of the FRSB are approximately £570,000, means each complaint resolved by FRSB officers and the charities themselves and not adjudicated at board-level costs about £30,000.

Of course self-regulation must continue but the IoF’s Standards Board has developed a set of highly-respected and vital codes of fundraising practice which in due course will lead to higher standards and greater conformity to the very best practice.

Self-regulation absolutely depends upon voluntary, co-operative effort by IoF members without whom the
codes would not be created. Those standards highlighted in the codes need not rely for their maintenance on a bureaucracy whose purpose is to sit in adjudication when those odes are breached. I cannot believe that our sector cannot find a group of expert individuals who would sit on a small but perfectly-formed independent panel and adjudicate on appeals for free.

After all, given past experience, they would not have to meet very often.

To be clear, while advocating debate around merger and reform, I do so mindful that some of the activities of the individual organisations above will need to continue. But sharing back-room functions – let alone savings on buildings and numerous chief executives and support staff – will result in cost savings. Ought not one subscription for one organisation be the order of the day?

And while posing these questions, there’s an even more fundamental issue to address: One day, I wonder whether Acevo, CFDG and the IoF could eventually form an Institute for all those that work in charities. Could Charities Aid Foundation re-merge with NCVO giving the latter powerful independent resources and therefore be better able to represent us all?

Maybe one day, maybe not yet.

Still, our leaders should certainly be thinking about the future landscape of our wonderful sector.

Paul Amadi is director of fundraising at the NSPCC and a trustee of the Institute of Fundraising. He is writing in a personal capacity. 

Angie Willems
Trustee
Coventry Cat Group
14 Jan 2012

Absolutely! Too much comes between the donation and the charity. The big boys may be able to afford huge bungs due to economies of scales but certainly us poor cousins surviving on £20K a year (with luck!) cannot even register with any of these fundraising groups. I'm sure the people who do donate to us would love it if I told them we would only a pennies of their £10 donations.
What a shame charity has become such big business.

Hugh C Mccaw FInstF
Founder
R Fundraising
2 Dec 2011

As usual Paul articulates a position which is well thought through and informed by experience. It is a position many of us have discussed over the years, clearly agree with, but not communicated as comprehensively and with such clarity. Well done Paul and thank you.

Sarah Sandon
Head of Fundraising
Progressio
16 Aug 2011

I agree with Paul Amadi. It is costly to have so many memberships to subscribe to. No one intended a series of job creation schemes that the sector should fund, did they?

Anon
9 Jun 2011

What a breath of fresh air.

Agree! But £100,000 a year sounds like a lot. Is this really true?? As an NSPCC donor I'd hate to think my money goes to the Institute of Fundraising, much less the PFRA!

Nigel Edward-Few
CEO
Jubilee Action
8 Jun 2011

I agree totally with Paul Amadi. We don't need all these para-charity organisations. I for one want to use my donors gifts for the work we seek to do, not to pay into endless quangos.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro (94) Niki May Young (36) Jonathon Grapsas (30) Michael Naidu (23) Adrian Beney (20) Andrew Scadding (20) Andrew Chaggar (17) Kirsty Weakley (17) Vibeka Mair (15) Jonathan Waddingham (15)
Suzie Who (15) David Philpott (14) Tania Mason (11) Robert Ashton (11) Daniel Fletcher (9) David Burrows (8) Alistair McLean (7) Gareth Jones (6) Beth Yorath (6) Reuben Turner (5) Rowena Lewis (5) Tobin Aldrich (5) Leon Ward (5) Mark Astarita (4) Tony Elischer (4) Stephen Pidgeon (4) Tod Norman (4) Ian Clark (4) Lucy Caldicott (3) Alan Gosschalk (3) Richard Radcliffe (3) Joe Saxton (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Gordon Hunter (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Lisa Clavering (3) Adam Rothwell (2) Beth Breeze (2) Matthew Bowcock (2) Tris Lumley (2) John Tate (2) Garreth Spillane (2) Liz Tait (2) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (2) Allan Freeman (2) Claire Routley (2) Lindsay Boswell (1) Victoria Cook (1) David Davison (1) Bill Lewis (1) Giles Pegram (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Derek Humphries (1) Alan Clayton (1) Cathy Pharoah (1) Stephen George (1) Gordon Michie (1) Chris Ingram (1) Martin Farrell (1) Morag Fleming (1) Matt Goody (1) Ian MacQuillin (1) Jackie Mendoza (1) Max Du Bois (1) Alan Hawkes (1) Ken Burnett (1) Ian Allsop (1) Martin Brookes (1) Tesse Akpeki (1) Anne Moynihan (1) Sara Llewellin (1) Rupert Tappin (1) Julia Unwin (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Scott Gray (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) Keith Collins (1) Peter O'Hara (1) Debbie Attwood (1) Joanna Motion (1) Paul Marvell (1) Amanda McLean (1) Jason Suckley (1) Paul Amadi (1) Imogen Ward (1) June O'Sullivan (1) Kath Abrahams (1) Peter Lewis (1) Dan Corry (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Belinda Pratten (1) Jonathan Last (1) Jenni Cahill (1) Paul Emery (1) Marcelle Speller (1) Nick Aldridge (1) Philip Spedding (1) Tom Latchford (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Jeff Brooks (1) Vicki Prout (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Dan Thompson (1) Steven George-Hilley (1) Emma-Lynn Houghton (1) Peter Horah (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) George Matafonov (1) Marcus Missen (1) Denise Lillya (1) Ali Stunt (1) Robin Fisk (1)
Less +++ More +++

Society Diary: Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it's a charity minister

11 Apr 2014

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

Innovation beyond the spin

8 Apr 2014

The Third Sector Research Centre recently finished examining 30 public service mutual spin-outs. Dan Gregory...

Charities need equivalents to share capital

7 Apr 2014

After struggling to grow as a charity, Charity Bank changed structure and last week sold £15m in shares...

Society Diary: Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it's a charity minister

11 Apr 2014

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

Society Diary: NCVO and Acevo jump on social enterprise bandwagon

4 Apr 2014

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

A strong charity sector needs a strong regulator

3 Apr 2014

Society and government are growing more reliant on charities, so why don't they do more to support its...

Free eNews