Share

Give it forward: Donating to universities

Give it forward: Donating to universities
Blogs

Give it forward: Donating to universities

Fundraising | Joanna Motion | 23 Sep 2010

Giving to universities in the UK is on the up. At a time when doom and gloom darkens the landscape, educational philanthropy is a source of light and cheer. In 2008-09, cash gifts to UK universities broke through the half billion pound mark for the first time – a heartening 18.8 per cent rise on the previous year. This in the teeth of the recession; bucking the trend in charitable giving in general; and in striking contrast to a drop in giving of 11.9 per cent to universities in the USA – so often used as the gold standard.

So what are we doing right? And can we keep up the momentum in the face of an ominous alliance of threats? 

Good news first. Universities are increasingly fundraising-friendly and fundraising-ready. Ambition, strategy, investment and sharpening professional skills are showing results. JK Rowling’s recent £10m gift to the University of Edinburgh for – or, rather, against – multiple sclerosis simply wouldn’t have happened 10 years ago. Nor could Cambridge University’s demolition this year of its £1bn campaign goal. Those satisfyingly chunky numbers are the fundraising equivalent of the 4-minute mile. A target that seemed humanly unattainable is brought into the realm of the do-able for those with courage, focus and training.

Then successive governments have helped. First through changes to the tax treatment of gifts. And then with the launch of the Matched Funding Scheme in 2008 – £200m for English universities and £10 for Welsh – to encourage giving to higher education. That time-limited opportunity has changed the conversation. With a cash incentive in front of them, universities have professionalised their development operations, talking to their supporters with a new urgency.

The Matched Funding Scheme also provides an investment in structured training. CASE (Council for Advancement and Support of Education) has boosted fundraising skills at all levels in universities, from Vice-Chancellors and Governors to Deans, Development Directors and shiny new graduate trainee fundraisers – a powerful legacy to the future. The impact of the opportunity has been greatest on universities without a long tradition of philanthropy.

Thames Valley University, to take one example, has worked hard to bring its base of just seven donors in 06-07 to an admirable 691 by 09-10. The rise in the number of donors to universities is a striking indicator, increasing at a steady rate of 12 per cent a year over the past five years, amounting to over 163,000 at the last count.

It means that behind the headline-making gifts from JK Rowling, James Dyson and Leonard Blavatnik there’s a swelling army of ordinary individual donors: university alumni, parents, neighbours, staff members – those who feel an attachment to a university and personally value what happens there. Those, too, who recognise that the big problems darkening our collective future – climate change, vile diseases, social injustice – have perhaps their best chance of being tackled within universities and by the bright, socially engaged people they produce.
 
Gifts to universities are gifts to the future. Not so much giving back as giving forward.

So far so good, then. But what of the threats? At a time when higher education is braced for dramatic cuts in public funding, two dragons, approaching from different directions, menace our growing army of private donors. One is the idea of a graduate tax and its many variants. And the other is the notion that gift aid could be streamlined – but in ways that would disadvantage major donors.

Giving is a voluntary act. Tax is an obligation. Giving – as donors tell us – is satisfying, rewarding, emotionally engaging. No one feels joyful about paying tax and compulsory levies: that’s a dour necessity. Philanthropy accelerates when the conditions are right: when donors choose to act from a basis of knowledge and conviction in partnership with an institution they trust. They repeat the experience – often with knobs on – when they see their money making the difference they hoped for. And the larger the gift, the more thought donors will take over the timing and means of its delivery – the tax implications, for instance.

So the question is, whom do we want alumni to have a continuing relationship with - and from which end of the telescope will we view the experience? The more we consider the donors’ perspective, and provide and protect mechanisms that encourage their generosity, the greater the philanthropic impact – and not just for education.

The lessons universities have learned in the past decade have meaning for the arts and heritage, for health and for high street charities too. So it’s in all our interests if the Treasury gift aid forum, due to report to ministers this month, regards the future of giving from the donors’ point of view. And then, if the Browne Review on student funding, expected to report next month, identifies funding models that encourage university graduates to behave as supportive philanthropists, rather than compel them to be grudging tax payers.  

Joanna Motion is vice president for international operations at CASE

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro (94) Niki May Young (36) Jonathon Grapsas (30) Michael Naidu (23) Adrian Beney (20) Andrew Scadding (20) Kirsty Weakley (19) Andrew Chaggar (17) Vibeka Mair (15) Jonathan Waddingham (15)
Suzie Who (15) David Philpott (14) Robert Ashton (12) Tania Mason (11) Daniel Fletcher (9) David Burrows (8) Jenna Pudelek (8) Alistair McLean (7) Beth Yorath (6) Leon Ward (6) Stephen Pidgeon (5) Reuben Turner (5) Rowena Lewis (5) Tobin Aldrich (5) Mark Astarita (4) Lucy Caldicott (4) Tony Elischer (4) Joe Saxton (4) Tod Norman (4) Ian Clark (4) David Ainsworth (4) Alan Gosschalk (3) Richard Radcliffe (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Gordon Hunter (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Lisa Clavering (3) Adam Rothwell (2) Beth Breeze (2) Matthew Bowcock (2) Cathy Pharoah (2) Ian MacQuillin (2) Tris Lumley (2) John Tate (2) Garreth Spillane (2) Liz Tait (2) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (2) Allan Freeman (2) Claire Routley (2) Alice Sharman (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Lindsay Boswell (1) Victoria Cook (1) David Davison (1) Bill Lewis (1) Giles Pegram (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Derek Humphries (1) Alan Clayton (1) Stephen George (1) Gordon Michie (1) Chris Ingram (1) Martin Farrell (1) Morag Fleming (1) Matt Goody (1) Paul Farthing (1) Jackie Mendoza (1) Max Du Bois (1) Alan Hawkes (1) Ken Burnett (1) Ian Allsop (1) Martin Brookes (1) Tesse Akpeki (1) Anne Moynihan (1) Sara Llewellin (1) Rupert Tappin (1) Julia Unwin (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Scott Gray (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) Keith Collins (1) Joe Jenkins (1) Peter O'Hara (1) Debbie Attwood (1) Joanna Motion (1) Paul Marvell (1) Amanda McLean (1) Jason Suckley (1) Paul Amadi (1) Imogen Ward (1) June O'Sullivan (1) Kath Abrahams (1) Peter Lewis (1) Dan Corry (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Belinda Pratten (1) Jonathan Last (1) Jenni Cahill (1) Paul Emery (1) Marcelle Speller (1) Nick Aldridge (1) Philip Spedding (1) Tom Latchford (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Lucy Gower (1) Jeff Brooks (1) Vicki Prout (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Dan Thompson (1) Steven George-Hilley (1) Emma-Lynn Houghton (1) Peter Horah (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) George Matafonov (1) Marcus Missen (1) Denise Lillya (1) Jaz Nannar (1) Ali Stunt (1) Robin Fisk (1) Gillian Claugher (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Emma Callagher (1) Angharad McKenzie (1) Raj Rajukumar (1)
Less +++ More +++

Independence of charitable foundations key to independence of sector

30 Oct 2014

Preserving the independence of foundations is essential to the future health of civil society, say Richard...

Learning from history

3 Oct 2014

With the emergence of the cloud, the number of accounting software options is growing fast – just as...

Brooks Newmark: a knit wit?

2 Oct 2014

Ian Allsop returned from holiday to find many in the sector already needled by Brooks Newmark. This article...

Charities should comfort beneficiaries and disturb those in power

31 Oct 2014

The voluntary sector needs to rediscover its voice, argues David Robinson. This is one of a series of...

The Charity Commission's board now needs to become more strategic

31 Oct 2014

Dorothy Dalton suggests that it is time for the Charity Commission's board to be less hands-on and to...

Councils need to stop trying to control everything and respect the community sector’s independence

23 Oct 2014

Richard Bridge examines the relationships between local authorities and community groups. This article...

Free eNews