Have a break - Nestle says corporate philanthropy is bad

Have a break - Nestle says corporate philanthropy is bad

Have a break - Nestle says corporate philanthropy is bad 1

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 10 May 2010

As Nestle’s chairman denounces corporate philanthropy, he proposes a trickle down theory for corporate social responsibility. Celina Ribeiro says at least he’s upfront.

It’s enough to make you choke on your fair-trade four-fingered Kit Kat: Corporate philanthropy is not a priority at Nestle SA.

It’s not really that surprising. You can continue to enjoy that chocolate coated wafer now. The multinational, despite its recent conversion to all things Fair Trade Foundation, has never been a darling of the ethical consumer/human rights campaigner/Greenpeace crowd– you know, for little things like palm oil production and marketing baby milk in Africa.

But that its disdain for corporate philanthropy is so public is, however, shocking. I almost want to applaud them for their honesty.

In a recent interview Nestle chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe declared that he is “personally very against corporate philanthropy”. Brabeck-Letmathe’s commitment to the principles of capitalism go deeper than I’ve yet heard anyone admit to; “You shouldn’t do good with money which doesn’t belong to you,” he said. “What you do with your own money, this is absolutely fine.”

He went on to suggest, as he has in the past, that doing good will probably, really, most likely end up doing bad anyway. So why bother? “Most social problems are extremely complex… You think at first glance you solve a problem here, but the reality is you’re just creating one somewhere else,” he said.

Last year – before the flagship Kit Kat went fairtrade – Nestle launched its not-CSR programme, called Creating Shared Value. The company also last year invested $27m in microfinance, which has largely gone to its own producers and suppliers to help them lift productivity. This, imagines Brabeck-Letmathe, is how companies should be helping to build a better society. It’s the trickle down theory, applied to corporate social responsibility. What is good for the shareholder is good for the cocoa farmer’s children.

At this point you may be tempted to spit out your Fairtrade Nescafe, but again, I urge you to complete the digestive process.

It is depressing that Nestle feels it appropriate to talk to anyone other than its shareholders about the self-serving pragmatism of its social responsibility programme, but they are being honest. Honest could be a strong word. Let's say they're being upfront in their arrogance.

It is likely that, even those companies which do throw the odd half-million into charities as donations, feel much the same. What this kind of talk might do is not necessarily shut the door to fundraisers, but give charities freedom to approach companies more as hard-talking equals. Or, of course, it could just be that you’re never going to get money out of Greenpeace’s biggest corporate enemy.

Either way, I’d guess Nestle is just the tip of the sugar cube. 

Gordon Palmer
Sales Manager
Civil Society
10 May 2010

Maybe there's a rather complex ethical/moral guidance model going on over there that we're not attuned to - What with this most recent example quoted, or the way they marketed baby formula in Africa etc, then taking a wider perspective there's the spectre of Nazi gold, the term "Swiss bank account" being synonymous with wealth of hidden origin, even Dignitas - you can't say the Swiss are afraid of being judged, or of shying away from making a buck on anything but commercial grounds.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro

Celina Ribeiro is the editor of Fundraising magazine and daily contributor to

Follow Celina @Celina_Ribeiro_

Celina Ribeiro (94) Niki May Young (36) Jonathon Grapsas (30) Michael Naidu (23) Kirsty Weakley (21) Adrian Beney (20) Andrew Scadding (20) Andrew Chaggar (17) Vibeka Mair (15) Jonathan Waddingham (15)
Suzie Who (15) David Philpott (14) Robert Ashton (12) Tania Mason (11) Jenna Pudelek (9) David Burrows (8) Alistair McLean (7) Leon Ward (7) Beth Yorath (6) Tobin Aldrich (6) Lucy Caldicott (5) Stephen Pidgeon (5) Reuben Turner (5) Rowena Lewis (5) David Ainsworth (5) Mark Astarita (4) Tony Elischer (4) Joe Saxton (4) Tod Norman (4) Ian Clark (4) Stephen Cotterill (4) Alan Gosschalk (3) Richard Radcliffe (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Gordon Hunter (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Lisa Clavering (3) Alice Sharman (3) Adam Rothwell (2) Beth Breeze (2) Matthew Bowcock (2) Cathy Pharoah (2) Ian MacQuillin (2) Tris Lumley (2) John Tate (2) Garreth Spillane (2) Liz Tait (2) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (2) Allan Freeman (2) Dan Corry (2) Claire Routley (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Lindsay Boswell (1) Victoria Cook (1) David Davison (1) Bill Lewis (1) Giles Pegram (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Derek Humphries (1) Alan Clayton (1) Stephen George (1) Andy Taylor (1) Gordon Michie (1) Chris Ingram (1) Martin Farrell (1) Morag Fleming (1) Matt Goody (1) Paul Farthing (1) Jackie Mendoza (1) Max Du Bois (1) Alan Hawkes (1) Ken Burnett (1) Ian Allsop (1) Martin Brookes (1) Tesse Akpeki (1) Anne Moynihan (1) Sara Llewellin (1) Rupert Tappin (1) Julia Unwin (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Scott Gray (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) Keith Collins (1) Joe Jenkins (1) Peter O'Hara (1) Debbie Attwood (1) Joanna Motion (1) Paul Marvell (1) Amanda McLean (1) Jason Suckley (1) Paul Amadi (1) Imogen Ward (1) June O'Sullivan (1) Kath Abrahams (1) Peter Lewis (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Belinda Pratten (1) Jonathan Last (1) Jenni Cahill (1) Paul Emery (1) Marcelle Speller (1) Nick Aldridge (1) Philip Spedding (1) Tom Latchford (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Lucy Gower (1) Jeff Brooks (1) Vicki Prout (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Dan Thompson (1) Steven George-Hilley (1) Emma-Lynn Houghton (1) Peter Horah (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) George Matafonov (1) Marcus Missen (1) Denise Lillya (1) Jaz Nannar (1) Ali Stunt (1) Robin Fisk (1) Gillian Claugher (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Emma Callagher (1) Angharad McKenzie (1) Raj Rajukumar (1) Eudora Pratt (1) Hugh Radojev (1)
Less +++ More +++

Going beyond the Sorp

1 May 2015

Andrew Hind has some advice for charities in the process of writing their annual reports.

Star gazing in the charity sector

1 May 2015

Ian Allsop ponders the meaning of rising stars, fading stars and no stars.

Technology lessons from down the ages

1 May 2015

Holiday technology frustrations remind John Tate of some important IT rules.

Society Diary: Duck lanes on the towpath and the lamest excuses for late filing

22 May 2015

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

The voluntary sector needs to fight for the Human Rights Act

21 May 2015

The government’s attempts to repeal the Human Rights Act is not just a problem for civil liberties charities...

The coalition and the charity sector: what were the highs and lows?

7 May 2015

The coalition government draws to a close today, following five years in which it has often had a turbulent...

Free eNews