Share

Dispatches misses the point in London Marathon story

Dispatches misses the point in London Marathon story
Blogs

Dispatches misses the point in London Marathon story 1

Fundraising | Suzie Who | 16 Apr 2010

Unsurprisingly organisers of the London Marathon are outraged by the recent Dispatches programme.

Broadcast only days before the key date in their year Channel 4’s undercover investigation ‘lifted the lid’ on how much it costs to stage the marathon, and how much of the money generated reaches charities.

The show’s conclusion – that of £17.8m received last year, only £4.5m was given to the London Marathon Charitable Trust and therefore made its way to good causes – has been described by Marathon organisers as breathtakingly ignorant and also poorly evidenced.

Regardless of the quality of the investigative journalism, didn’t anyone else think that the programme entirely missed the point?

The money that is raised each year thanks to the London Marathon is not £17.8m, nor is it the percentage of revenue from entry fees and advertising that the organisers put into a charitable trust.

The money that is raised each year is the huge sum donated in sponsorship by individual runners, their friends and families.

Compared to this even the entire £17.8m of revenue earned by London Marathon Ltd pales into insignificance. In 2008 alone almost £47m was raised by runners.

It is these individuals who, at the same time as they train for a gruelling test of physical endurance, raise thousands for charities each year.

To undermine their efforts and motivation at such a critical stage of their preparations seems totally unfair.

The target of the programme may have been the high earning employees of London Marathon Ltd but the only people it actually harmed were the runners and the charities they are supporting.

Mr T


18 Apr 2010

Untrue! As someone who has run many marathons for charities(never the London one - I have never gotten a place!) and currently works for a charity buying these so-called "gold bond" places, the programme tried to bring to our attention the monopolistic environment that this particular "charity" operates in. The organisers do not negotiate; nor do they publish any fiscal information. The funds the good-intentioned marathon runners are able to raise would still be raised without the extortionist prices that charities have to pay to secure a place. Bravo Channel 4!

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert