Share

Rivalry in advertising will help no charities

Rivalry in advertising will help no charities
Blogs

Rivalry in advertising will help no charities

Fundraising | Suzie Who | 17 Mar 2010

New codes of practice relating to advertising mean that we could all soon be running campaigns comparing ourselves favourably against our direct competitors.

So, rather than endless indistinguishable DRTV adverts that show a sick dog/ abused child/ poor person being helped thanks to charity X, Y or Z – we might end up with adverts more reminiscent of the campaign run a few years ago by the SSPCA.

The taglines to that campaign were highly memorable: "It's time the RSPCA stopped stealing food from the mouths of Scotland's defenceless animals. If you want to help animals in Scotland, please donate to the Scottish SPCA, not the RSPCA."

But, in my opinion, they were memorable for all the wrong reasons; all I really know about SSPCA is that they campaigned against a sister agency. I have no real understanding of their work or how they do help Scotland’s defenceless animals – just that they are bitter rivals of their cross-border competitor, RSPCA.

The thought of this kind of rivalry being played out in public by charities across all sectors is incredibly unpleasant but also a serious concern.

As a sector we know we need to work together to overcome the apathy and cynicism that prevents so many members of the public ever supporting any cause.

The last thing we need to do is undermine the work of bodies such as the FRSB and Institute of Fundraising by attempting to score cheap wins against each other.

Surely adverts that point out that one particular homelessness charity spends X per cent more on fundraising costs than a close rival, or that Cancer Charity A has higher governance costs than Cancer Charity B can not be in the best interests of any of us in the sector?

But perhaps I am worrying about nothing?

We all know that transparency and effectiveness are important to donors - they rightly want to be sure that their donations are being spent well.

But ultimately it is not our effectiveness that makes people respond to adverts, they give because they have been moved by the difference their money can make to people, animals and places in desperate need.

If we all stick to the basics of fundraising and remember that ultimately the majority of the public respond from their hearts not their heads, formulaic, one size fits all DRTV adverts should continue for some time to come.

Now, that really is a worry…

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert