Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?
7 Feb 2012
Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.
At the outset I should make a confession: there is nothing particularly rockstar about me, in fact a great deal of my time is spend at home, drinking red wine with Maria Callas blaring out of the CD player. So, all in all, I am an unlikely suitor to promote rock ‘n’ roll thinking for civil society brands.
My first job in the charity sector was running the events and fundraising programme at a health promotion charity. I actually loved it, though I was big on ideas and not entirely efficient. I then moved into the arts and worked for a festival that had an amazing drive to inspire and excite in all its communications, and then an opera company that bored me to death.
Nowadays I find myself at the Foundation for Social Improvement, a charity that is at the heart of a vibrant small-charity sector, that does what it does well and that is always on the lookout for ways to better deliver support to small charities. I figure, though for modesty’s sake it hasn’t been explicitly stated, that my job is to turn up the FSI’s mojo; but maybe the wider sector needs a dose of brand Viagra?
We’ve all got passion and zeal, but so many charities aren’t harnessing this to maximum benefit: we’re simply not in touch with our inner brand rockstar.
Why don’t we talk brand more?
Mad Men is the hottest thing on television, so why aren’t we embracing our inner ad man (or rockstar) more? It is a particular concern to smaller charities who want to get noticed.
Without huge budgets I recommend trying ideas out: storyboard what you stand for, what makes you stand apart, how you’d would sell your charity if it were a product, what a campaign may look like if you had an unlimited budget and the best creative minds in the business.
Do it over morning tea or Friday drinks with the whole team; collectively discussing your brand informs all manner of work from the obvious applications in marketing, through to ways that it can support fundraising, staff development and your whole public-engagement programme. Your language is your emotional toolkit – use it or lose it!
Brand isn’t just visual identity- you don’t need to roll out a new logo or letterhead or website to affect a brand shift. Start at the beginning and get your team thinking about the values that define your brand and apply it. It may manifest in the way you speak to a donor, the image you pick for your Christmas card, or perhaps create a word that enters your organisational vernacular, the opportunities are there - you just need to get a bit rock ‘n’ roll about finding them.
Make it fun: If our brand was a drink what would it be? Hot chai (authentic, international, easily-adapted), water (essential, the essence of life, clear), coffee (a driver, addictive, adult), Dom Perignon (a classic, sophisticated, unobtainable), or Wicked (cheap, cheerful, regretted the next morning)?
When you are writing that all-important first paragraph of your annual report try thinking about that drink and how it would introduce itself - you’ll be amazed where inspiration comes from!
Personally, I like to think that I’m a champagne cocktail: bubbly, fun, yet well-crafted with a bit of prestige (maybe I’m dreaming!). Every day I try to apply a bit of this to what I do. I want the charities I work with to have fun with their brands and embrace their inner rockstar too.
So, what would your personal storyboard look like?
Tony
NA
NA
8 Mar 2010
I agree whole heartedly with your new blogger. As someone who works in marketing for a large charity, we are always striving to be r'n'r...ideas don't need to be "wacky" or "crazy" - just innovative and different.
People who don't understand branding always treat it with disdain...unfortunately, most of them currently appear to be working in the charity sector, which is why the majority of branding there is tired, utilitarian and dull.
If I were a drink I'd be a large Bolly Stolly, to help drown out the monotous whine of the dissenters.
Ed
Head of IG
Crisis
4 Mar 2010
This is exactly the sort of rubbish that gives fundraising and marketing a bad name at charities.
We don't need to be rock n roll. We don't need wacky crazy creative ideas.
We just need to authenically communicate what we do in a compelling way.
If I were a drink I'd be a large jug of cold water and tip myself on the head of every creative brand 'expert' I came across.
Anyone interested in an antidote to this sort of thing should read the blog www.futurefundraisingnow.com
7 Feb 2012
Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.
6 Feb 2012
Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.
2 Feb 2012
Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...
7 Feb 2012
As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...
23 Jan 2012
Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...
23 Jan 2012
Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...
Garreth Spillane
PR, Marketing & Communications Manager
The FSI
8 Mar 2010
Thanks for the feedback Ed.
We appear to be agreed on one thing: the "need to authenically communicate what we do in a compelling way”"[sic]. We do, however, diverge on the execution thereof: I maintain that in a media-saturated consumer world that we need to constantly evaluate how our brand can compete.
When did the launch of a charity campaign last get the media or consumer buzz of the launch of the iPad? It is certainly that level of brand engagement and excitement I aspire to.
Rock and roll thinking really needn’t equate with "wacky crazy creative ideas". Rock and roll has delivered us iconic imagery that secures huge value (and profitability): the Sgt Peppers cover, Nirvana’s swimming baby, the Rolling Stones’ lips ident. I for one would be more than happy to develop a charity brand with that level of bankability.
[Reply]