Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?
7 Feb 2012
Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.
Getcher pecs out for the lads!
The other day I noticed a website headline shouting “Why has this man got his top off?” beside a picture of a man with his well-toned chest out. Why indeed! According to the article that followed, "Mark Foster is supporting Prostate Cancer Awareness Month by posing in his underwear for a poster campaign".
Initially I was confused, why would showing a fit bloke with his pecs out make men think about the risks of prostate cancer? It made me think about my ever-expanding waistline and the need to do more cycling.
I Googled for more information and found a range of websites, from the worlds of fashion, celebrity and gay news that took the time to copy and paste the Prostate Cancer Awareness press release, word for word, onto their pages. And it is there that I found out that Mark wasn’t posing in his own underpants, but in the new Marks and Spencer Autograph range of pants, of which 10 per cent of all sales will go to the charity.
Ahh, I see now, this is about flogging blokes' pants and raising money.
Is this a bad thing? Not sure, although I get the feeling that more women will have been moved to buy pants for their partners than men and that few men will have been moved to seek information about prostate cancer after seeing the poster.
But it does pose two questions for me:
1) Who would be a good person to put on a poster about prostate cancer awareness? I took note when I saw the Bob Monkhouse message-from-the-grave posters a couple of years ago.
2) Would a breast cancer charity show a woman with so little clothing on to raise awareness or funds? Probably not, and I don’t think that research, treatment and support for sufferers of breast cancer has been so successful because the charities persuaded men to buy their partners frilly knickers.
So I am left with a feeling that effective awareness-raising is being sidelined to raise funds and sell pants. Oh, and the remit of the charity? To raise awareness of the risk of prostate cancer...
7 Feb 2012
Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.
6 Feb 2012
Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.
2 Feb 2012
Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...
7 Feb 2012
As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...
23 Jan 2012
Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...
23 Jan 2012
Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...
Rowena Lewis
Head of Fundraising and Development
The Fawcett Society
1 Mar 2010
I too was surprised to see a semi naked man on the cover the other week. I'm reminded of the calendar girls routine, and I’m disappointed.
They say sex sells but gimmicks aside - could nudity be the future of fundraising? I'd say not. Rippling pecks and semi nakedness may grab attention, but attention grabbing does not necessarily correlate to awareness raising, and I’ve yet to see evidence that nudity increases fundraising ROI.
The Bob Monkhouse message from the grave campaign struck a chord with me. It acted as a powerful reminder of the dangers of prostate cancer, the importance of early diagnosis, and of the fact that men are much less likely to visit their GP than women (under the age of 45, men visit their GP only half as often as women). This was one campaign I won't forget.
But whilst waxing lyrical about 'stripping down to [my] pants', Mark Foster does very little to tempt my head, heart or wallet. Sadly I won’t be buying my boyfriend M&S pants anytime soon!
[Reply]