Share

Bad call - the Pell & Bales telephone fundraising scandal

Bad call - the Pell & Bales telephone fundraising scandal
Blogs

Bad call - the Pell & Bales telephone fundraising scandal 1

Fundraising | Suzie Who | 19 Feb 2010

Poor old Pell and Bales. It has been a bad few months for them in the press.

Following revelations in September that one of their callers dealt inappropriately with a member of the public who was suffering from cancer, News of the World have now infiltrated their offices in the kind of clandestine manouver I thought they reserved for premiership footballers and minor royals.

However, although their title was shocking enough, the content of their 'expose' seemed incredibly weak to me.

Trained fundraisers call charity supporters to update them on the work they are supporting and ask them to consider giving more - not really what I was expecting when I read the headline.

I have often thought what a grim job it would be to be a telephone fundraiser.

It is alright for us 'professional' fundraising managers, sat snugly behind our desks, protected from irate donors by a switchboard or supporter services team.

But although we may seldom meet or speak to donors unless they give a five figure sum or more, many of our charities rely on call centres to do work we can't or won't do ourselves.

Knowing this, I was delighted to see charities jumping to the defence of Pell and Bales after News of the World launched its vitriolic attack on them

Telephone fundraising agencies are an easy target, just like street fundraisers - and we should defend them because they are critical to the success of our work

Of course we should promote high standards, but reading the News of the World article I am not convinced that there was much really wrong at Pell and Bales

I see that the FRSB have requested a meeting with P&B to 'discuss the allegations'.

Let's hope that they take this as an opportunity to offer support and guidance to these frontline fundraisers, whose work generating unrestricted income for major charities probably pays for their membership fees, amongst all the other unglamorous things we can not avoid paying for.

Adrian Beney
Partner
Iain More Associates
19 Feb 2010

Couldn't agree more. If NOTW want to be angry about something they could be angry about abused children, or global warming, or people starving or any of the multitude of things paid for by donors to telephone campaigns like the ones P&B organise.

It was Kevin Bales who got me into telephone fundraising and I learned the trade from Simon Pell. I owe them a great deal. And how bad is it to ask?

In fact I was called by a delightful woman from P&B for Oxfam on Wednesday night, and I made a gift. Not what the script asked for, but what I wanted to give. She seemed happy and so was I.

Let us hold the FRSB to account about this.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?

7 Feb 2012

Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.

Hold tight - we're moving!

6 Feb 2012

Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.

Time management: execute with excellence

2 Feb 2012

Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...

The sector needs to better support its women, says Rowena Lewis

7 Feb 2012

As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...

Don’t just stand there shouting, say something useful

23 Jan 2012

Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...

Return from Haiti: a new focus on governance

23 Jan 2012

Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...

emailalert