Share

A reflection on MPs expenses. Start the New Year with a smile!

A reflection on MPs expenses.  Start the New Year with a smile!
Blogs

A reflection on MPs expenses. Start the New Year with a smile!

Fundraising | Andrew Scadding | 7 Jan 2010

Cut to the core, as it used to say in some ad or other. The MPs’ expenses row isn’t about their claims for expenses, its about weak management and the alleged exploitation of that weakness by a relatively small group of presumably unscrupulous or amoral individuals.

For thirty years or more successive governments have failed to grasp the nettle of MPs pay. Being an MP is an expensive business. It requires lots of work at anti-social hours, even in the supposedly reformed House of today. MPs earn and need proper remuneration. The public knows and understands this, but successive governments have fought shy.

Attempts to link MPs pay to civil service rates failed because the government of the day conceded a rise to civil servants which it was not prepared to concede to MPs. They feared the attendant publicity.  Other similarly practical schemes have all fallen in the face of pusillanimous short-term expediency, usually the fervent desire to avoid a storm in the press.

Instead, pay enhancements were disguised as expense claims.  MPs were compensated through an expenses system which actively encouraged overclaiming, misrepresentation and even allegedly fraud.  

The venality of this system from the MPs point of view is that it institutionally penalises honesty whilst rewarding and encouraging deceit. The Fees Office, which should be a watchdog, became instead a guide dog, eager to walk any morally challenged MP around the darker but more profitable intricacies of a corrupt system.

Because the failings in the system were so widely known it became an accident waiting to happen. The only truly remarkable thing about this scandal is that it did not break 15 years ago when the press zeroed in on the allied MPs’ trade of brown-envelope pocketing. And when the balloon finally went up, the public, realising it had been hoodwinked, lied to and generally treated with contempt (how very rare), was sure to react as it has, with unsuppressed fury.  

Government, faced by the righteous wrath of the public thus unleashed, remained true to its tradition of 24-carat cowardice in the face of the press, so blamed the whole thing on the MPs. Government cannot admit that the entire debacle is the result of its own spectacularly weak management. Honest MPs who have followed the advice offered by the fees office because they have to make ends meet have been dumped on to get government off the hook. Unsurprsingly, MPs are unhappy!

Where is the message for charities? Be honest and open about your costs and your spending. Transparency may be uncomfortable, but not so unpleasant as the consequences of getting caught in a lie. If you blunder, ‘fess up. Trust your supporters to take an informed and intelligent interest in your explanations. Some will let you down, most will surprise you.

Weakness and deceit, by contrast, engender only contempt.  Politicians are quick to lecture charities on the perils of losing public confidence. Start the New Year with a smile.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Andrew Scadding

Andrew Scadding has been in and around fundraising since 1967, as a fundraiser, trustee and database programmer. He is currently incarnated as chief executive of Thai Children's Trust.

 

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert