Share

Assume nothing - the death of cheques does not mean the end of cheque donors

Assume nothing - the death of cheques does not mean the end of cheque donors
Blogs

Assume nothing - the death of cheques does not mean the end of cheque donors

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 26 Nov 2009

The long history of the cheque could soon be coming to an end.

The mysterious forces behind the Payments Council shall be meeting next month to decide whether signing a rectangular piece of paper will still entitle the bearer ‘to the sum of’ in the post-2018 future.

For some charities, this is going to require a massive shift in the way they process and solicit their donations. Donkey Sanctuary gets in a whopping 70 per cent of its income in ye olde cheque form. Will that 70 per cent suddenly start coming in via online marathon sponsorship pages? Perhaps not (particularly when the SPANA donkeys put in such a good show in London’s long distance running events).

But perhaps it is time to assume nothing. My argument is backed by a discreet sample of the donating public: me. 

I wrote my first ever ‘for real’ cheque last week.

Not only that, but I entered my first ever raffle as a consenting adult (as opposed to peer pressured primary school student). And not only that, but I sent the cheque for the raffle in the post. The paper post. I bought a stamp and everything.

This is highly unusual behaviour for me. My typical way of donating to charity is via direct debit donation, online sponsorship of friends on (increasingly less impressive) events and the occasional foray into a charity shop. The last time I bought a stamp was in 2006 for a postcard to my mum.

Prior to being asked by a friend to enter this raffle, I was not even sure I owned a chequebook. It took me and my partner an embarrassing length of time to locate and fill in the cheque, not sure of the peculiar traditions of the payment form.

But I still donated. I donated because I was asked and because I believe in the charity (the original request for raffle tickets came via a solitary and probably ignore-able Facebook status update).

Habits are breakable, if they deserve to be broken.

I am aware that some charities will have to mollycoddle their older donors through first-time credit card payments. I know that the ceremonial giant cheque will lose much of its appeal if even its miniature equivalent is no longer legal tender.

Older donors may be stuck in their ways, but surely they are not stupid.

If I can write a cheque, Dorothy can phone a call centre, and the Big Money people can get their people to organise a bank transfer.

But those giant cheques will be sorely missed.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro

Celina Ribeiro is the editor of Fundraising magazine and daily contributor to CivilSociety.co.uk.

Follow Celina @Celina_Ribeiro_

Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?

7 Feb 2012

Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.

Hold tight - we're moving!

6 Feb 2012

Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.

Time management: execute with excellence

2 Feb 2012

Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...

The sector needs to better support its women, says Rowena Lewis

7 Feb 2012

As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...

Don’t just stand there shouting, say something useful

23 Jan 2012

Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...

Return from Haiti: a new focus on governance

23 Jan 2012

Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...

emailalert