Share

Shrewd cardigan - the Oxford researcher who wants to change giving

Shrewd cardigan - the Oxford researcher who wants to change giving
Blogs

Shrewd cardigan - the Oxford researcher who wants to change giving

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 16 Nov 2009

It sounds like a warm, fuzzy, cardigan-ed idea that could only be borne out of a cosy Oxbridge office, walled in by leather-bound books and the all-pervasive odour of hope.

But the Oxford University boffin who has pledged to give away £1m over his career, and has created a society to get people to do the same, is no generous dope. His pipe dream is much more substance than smoke, and only the best charities will see a penny.

Dr Toby Ord, a practical ethics researcher, last Saturday established a society called Giving What We Can. Like any good movement founder, he is leading by example: pledging to give away £1m over his career, £2.5m with his wife’s philanthropy. Having revelled in the austere, yet fulfilling, years of student life, Dr Ord has decided that he will shed off to charities anything he earns over £20,000 per year – inflation adjusted. Half of his salary is designated for the developing world.

Other members of the society, which include prominent philosophers and other such, must pledge to give away 10 per cent of their salaries a year. A kind of secular, humanitarian tithe, or a more romantic form of payroll giving.

He estimates that the society could raise at least £250m over the course of his and his wife’s careers. With 23 members now signed up, £9.5m has already been pledged – and the society is only three days old.

The idealism of the group borders on the hippy-esque. It encourages not only a re-evaluation of exactly what we in the west "can" give (as opposed to "want", "should" or "... once I've got a new autumn coat"), but a re-evaluation of how we should be giving.

This is not giving with closed eyes. Dr Ord has already conducted research into how his pound can achieve the greatest possible impact on global health, calculating that it costs £30,000 to save a year of healthy life in the UK, but that “the most efficient programmes in developing countries can achieve this for only £2”.

The group will not only get together to discuss philosophical questions of developing world poverty, but share information about the most effective charities and tax efficient ways to give. Critically, this is not a think tank encouraging more transparency and impact reporting. These are donors. Not wealthy, but passionate and very, very discerning.

"By standing together as a group, we hope to make others see giving this much as a real option and to encourage charities to be more efficient in their programmes so as to attract our giving," said Dr Ord.

This is not just a movement to give away money. This is a donor-led manifesto on effective charities. They are organised. They are generous. They are informed. They are sacrificing and they are going to make it worth their time.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro

Celina Ribeiro is the editor of Fundraising magazine and daily contributor to CivilSociety.co.uk.

Follow Celina @Celina_Ribeiro_

Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?

7 Feb 2012

Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.

Hold tight - we're moving!

6 Feb 2012

Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.

Time management: execute with excellence

2 Feb 2012

Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...

The sector needs to better support its women, says Rowena Lewis

7 Feb 2012

As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...

Don’t just stand there shouting, say something useful

23 Jan 2012

Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...

Return from Haiti: a new focus on governance

23 Jan 2012

Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...

emailalert