Share

Donation usability - lessons from the experts

Donation usability - lessons from the experts
Blogs

Donation usability - lessons from the experts 5

Web usability guru Jakob Nielsen recently released a report on donation usability. It’s a must-read for any charity collecting donations online
 
 Here’s the summary of their study of 23 US charity websites:

"User research finds significant deficiencies in non-profit organizations' website content, which often fails to provide the info people need to make donation decisions."

In layman’s terms – the sites weren’t very clear. And the worst thing was that they hindered the ability, or desire, for users to make a donation. I’m going to focus on the issue of finding out how to donate (not the donation process itself).

The report noted some “donation-killers” - things that caused charities to lose out on donations.

"Amazingly, on 17 per cent of the sites, users couldn't find where to make a donation."

Now, this amazed them. But it doesn’t amaze me. I spend a lot of time looking at charity websites, and it’s often really hard to find out how to donate. Which is just crazy.

At last year’s National Convention, presenters were speaking about the death of the ‘donate now’ button, saying you should replace it with “join us” or “find out more”. They are wrong. And the people listening disagreed too.

There are many different reasons people will visit a website (often called ‘use cases’) and you will want to meet all the different needs of those people. So it’s no good taking away a ‘donate now’ button and replacing it with a ‘find out more’ button. Yes, you will meet the needs of those who might want to find out more, but you’re disregarding the needs of those who want to donate.

And there are people who will just want to donate. They aren’t the *only* people who will visit your website, by any means, but there are some people who will, for whatever reason, just want to give money to you.

Now I’m not advocating the removal of ‘find out more’ or ‘join us’ messages – the web is a really powerful way of getting people engaged and bringing them closer to your organisation, but you still need to make it easy to  donate. And it is possible to do both. Look at Breast Cancer Care’s new website – in the menu they have “Get involved” followed by “Donate”. Two user needs, met. Simple.

At the PF digicomms conference in January, I listened to Bertie Bosredon from Breast Cancer Care talk about how they’d built their new site, and they get it – the site was based on focus groups and research with all areas of the charity, so that they built the relevant use cases for their audience, and could then meet all those different user needs with their new website. It’s a great example.

But if you don’t have the time and resources they do, there is an easy way to get some free user testing that will give you insight into your site’s usability: just grab a friend, relative or even someone off the street, and ask them to try and make a donation to your charity online. If they can’t do it, or it takes an awful long time and loads of clicks, you need to fix your site. And once you’ve got that sorted, you can focus on the story telling, engagement, interactivity, or whatever other use cases you want to meet, safe in the knowledge that anyone who wants to donate, can.

Read Joe Saxton's piece 'The death of 'donate now'?' on Professional Fundraising.

Alex
23 Apr 2009

This applies to regular gifts as well single gifts. We often do spot checks on our client's websites when we see a very low number of donations coming through and more times then not, it's hard for us to find the donate button - and we spend our lives online looking at charity sites! Many times the donate now button is so buried in the site that it takes 5 or more clicks to get there. This always makes me cringe because I can't imagine donors spending this much time hunting for a way to give.

 

Katie
20 Apr 2009

I couldn't agree more! I also heard that talk about the 'donate now' button being out-of-date and pushy, but you have to acknowledge that for a number of users, the reason why they are logging on to your site is to make a donation. Charities shouldn't be embarassed or hide the fact that they want people's money online as well as offline.

 

TeeEmPee
20 Apr 2009

Plus ça change. Justgiving is not the only web-based donations company to advise charities to up their standards when it comes to ease of donation usability issues on their web sites, but they've always been a consistent advocate of clear donation buttons on sites, even among the 'web 2.0' donation land grab/get out there scramble.

It's really a common sense issue, but it appears many charities still don't seem to be getting the message. I remember speaking at a PF conference 4 years or so ago where a fundraiser told me of the struggle she was having getting 'IT' to put a donate button in the generic navigation bar. I'd like to say it's hard to believe this is still an issue for almost one in five charity web sites, but...

 

Bertie
20 Apr 2009

Thanks for the mention of Breast Cancer Care new website. I did the talk before the new website went live. The big learning is no matter how many users you consult with, there will always be a vocal minority who don't like change. So building a site with users is important but equally important is listening and adapting post launch.

You need a link to Donate easy to find, but I still believe a big part of its purpose is to re-assure your internal audience. Across your website, you should but messages instead of flashing banners.

Last year, I wrote a short article for Civil Society IT on "donate now".

" We should soon see the end of the ‘donate now’ banners. Several charities have already replaced those with a ‘what we do with your money’ button – the next step will be ‘why I am giving and why you should too."

 

Jonathan Waddingham
20 Apr 2009

I should probably point out again that I'm not advocating a "donate now" page to just say "donate now". It's the signposting from other areas of a website that's not obvious enough for users. This is an information architecture argument more than anything. I think you *have* to have a clear sign on the site to show where people can donate, but once on that page, it should be filled with "what your money does" information, and perhaps, as Bertie advocates, a "why I donated and you should too" section. That was another area the report said was weak - the ask on the donate page itself wasn't clear, or compelling enough.

And yes Tom, it's a shame that we still have to talk about this, but it hasn't improved that much - the eConsultancy wrote about this issue too.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert