Share

Fundraising online. Do the basics, please.

Fundraising online. Do the basics, please.
Blogs

Fundraising online. Do the basics, please. 4

Recent research in the US suggests that many first-time online donors go on to make their subsequent gifts offline through direct mail.  So we should probably not bother fundraising online anymore, and stick to DM, right. Right?

I mean, getting people to register for Direct Debits is probably the only way to keep donors, at this time when long-term value is even more important than ever. But then again, DM volumes are falling for the first time in this country, and cancellations of Direct Debits are increasing.

So what can we do?

Well, we should start by going back to basics. Things like thanking people who donate to you. Yes, thanking people. Simple as that.

Everything I read in the press suggests that it’s not a particularly good time to be looking for new donors, so think about how you treat people who already give money to you.

One response to the reasons why online donors may switch offline was given on the Agitator blog – where a commenter,  Dave Raley, theorised that the reason people switch offline could be that the communication methods offline were more established than online:

Goes something like: Acquire a donor online + Poor/inconsistent/infrequent online cultivation + Good/frequent direct mail cultivation = Online donor migrates to direct mail

I couldn’t agree more. Whilst many charities have well established offline donor journeys, I’ve barely seen any with online donor engagement programmes. Very few even thank their donors – and if we don’t thank people, why should they bother to donate again?

Even more worrying is the fact that many charities don’t even thank ordinary people raising thousands of pounds on their behalf. A donor may give you £20, but someone taking part in an event or getting donations instead of birthday presents will raise hundreds, even thousands. Do you have a different way of communicating with them that demonstrates how important they are to you, that takes into account the amazing sums they raise? Do you even talk to them at all?

Are you spending all your time with your digital agency on fundraising campaigns, or on thanking campaigns? I’ve yet to see a really micro-site created with the specific aim of thanking people (although I’d love nothing more than to be contradicted here).

We can all talk about the value of social media, and how charities can use the power of the internet (and don’t worry, I’ll be writing plenty on that in due course) but if you don’t do the basics right and thank people, you may as well stick to offline comms and not bother with having a website at all.

Peter
1 Apr 2009

I completely agree. My father died 3 years ago, and left a sizeable part of his estate to 4 charities. We asked for confirmations of receipt. 2 charities never even acknowledged their cheques, 1 charity acknowledged but did not thank, 1 charity both acknowledged and thanked and told us what they were doing with the money (they built a new care room) and they also checked and told us the 2 non-acknowledging charities had, in deed, received their cheques.

 

Jonathan Waddingham
31 Mar 2009

Thanks Paul - I think you make the point really well, that these are the most important things, ahead of any new fad or trend. It's why I wanted to start with this subject rather than the latest thing I've seen online that I think is quite innovative or interesting. Andrew - thx for sharing the story of that site, it's absolutely, totally brilliant. Just the sort of thing I wish more charities would do - and could do.

 

Paul Whaley
30 Mar 2009

I second, third and fourth this - for the life of me, I cannot understand how any fundraiser can give themselves the title if they don't, as a matter of routine, thank people for doing things for them - from small favour to major gift. This, far more than Twitter or Facebook accounts and whatever other social media one might bandy about, is *the* cornerstone of any relationship.

As someone working in an association with a tiny budget, I'm dependent on favours and therefore good relationships all round. Acknowledging other people's effort is critical for me having any success at all. The same is true of cultivating donors (if you'll forgive the ghastly phrase). People help people with whom they have relationships. Fundraisers might ask themselves - how many people do they work with who show zero appreciation for their efforts? Besides the boss to whom they are beholden, I'd guess about zero. Then they should ask themselves - how does this translate if they were a donor?

How many charities who don't acknowledge would they give to? I'd say about zero.

 

Andrew Robinson
30 Mar 2009

Great post and couldn't agree more. I've just come across a really good site that's sole purpose is to thank people. It's by the Canadian Blood service - so why not specifically thanking for donating money, it is thanking for donating time and something quite precious - their own blood. What I like about it is that the thank you is beneficiary generated.

You can find the link and more about it on my blog here: http://www.andrewjrobinson.net/?p=75

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert