Share

The FRSB is not a greyhound, but an unloved camel

The FRSB is not a greyhound, but an unloved camel
Blogs

The FRSB is not a greyhound, but an unloved camel 1

Fundraising | Andrew Scadding | 19 Jan 2009

Welcome, Alistair McLean, new chief executive of FRSB.  I have been racking my brains to find common ground between greyhound racing and fundraising.  Nothing comes to mind except profound and very personal gratitude that it is not the custom to take old, underperforming fundraisers round the back of the kennels and shoot us.

Alistair McLean, the name speaks adventure and derring-do.  Will you need a sense of adventure?  I think you may!

Certainly Mr McLean you are coming to FRSB at an interesting time.  After a couple of years, it has half the members it needs, and a quarter of the members it wants.  OTS will not fund it indefinitely; cannot in the current economic climate.  Quick and decisive results are required, or – well, or what?  Or we’ll have to start all over again, because the demand for regulation is not going to go away.

But it won’t be easy, Mr McLean.  A series of catastrophic decisions are flocking home to roost.  First and worst was the stubborn determination of FRSB’s founding fathers to exclude fundraising charities from its top table, whilst expecting them to pick up the substantial tab.  An offer many charities have found all too easy to refuse, even in the teeth of bullying and threats.  The 50 largest  were persuaded to join, but at the cost of capping their subs at £5,000.  This failed on two counts: there was no rush of smaller charities joining in the wake of the big guys.  But the cap will depress future subscription income, as contributions from smaller charities concertina below it: it was a bad deal.  FRSB is not a greyhound, but an unloved camel with a dodgy constitution and a nobbled income.  Don’t waste your time or OTS’s £100,000 quid trying to flog it to us.

Mr McLean, success requires that you act boldly and decisively!  First, take the camel out and shoot it, or at least its constitution.  Replace it with a functioning, democratic membership system.  Encourage member charities to engage fully in the governance and policymaking of FRSB as we do in PFRA.

We can be persuaded to take full responsibility for funding it adequately, if we help define ‘adequate’.  Give FRSB an honest and respectable product to present, and give fundraising charities genuine self-regulation.  Good luck, Mr McLean!  Please give us the FRSB we need and deserve.

Andrew
26 Jan 2009

We were more than a little surprised to be cold called today by the FRSB asking for more members. So surprised that we wrote an opinion piece on it: http://www.soschildrensvillages.org.uk/charity-news/fsb.htm

What is the point of a fundraising standards board when the fundraising promise is so bland it raises no standard and when it is so in bed with the big bad direct mailers? Let's hope it dies a natural death and we can build something new which starts with what the standards are and has no "prevalent is acceptable" premise.

Andrew Cates

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Andrew Scadding

Andrew Scadding has been in and around fundraising since 1967, as a fundraiser, trustee and database programmer. He is currently incarnated as chief executive of Thai Children's Trust.

 

Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?

7 Feb 2012

Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.

Hold tight - we're moving!

6 Feb 2012

Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.

Time management: execute with excellence

2 Feb 2012

Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...

The sector needs to better support its women, says Rowena Lewis

7 Feb 2012

As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...

Don’t just stand there shouting, say something useful

23 Jan 2012

Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...

Return from Haiti: a new focus on governance

23 Jan 2012

Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...

emailalert