Share

The true value of campaigning?

The true value of campaigning?
Blogs

The true value of campaigning? 2

Fundraising | Jonathon Grapsas | 24 Oct 2008

I’ve read and observed lots over the past few years from charities all over the globe about the value of their campaigning or lobbying efforts. For the most part I hear things like, 'If a regular giver subsequently becomes a campaigner it increases their lifetime value by 20 per cent'.

And as fundraisers we love this. Why? Because it’s quantifiable.

But what about direct impact? I’m not talking about how much extra money you can raise by getting someone to take action, but how does it help progress your cause?

For me, the primary reason I am yet to find someone who has truly cracked this is because of that dreaded five letter word: silos.

Let me explain...

I once had a meeting with a large NGO and we wanted to discuss some ideas to demonstrate genuine joined-up thinking, how to bring fundraising and campaigning together to raise some money and empower individuals to take action.

So what happened?

The campaigners turned up for the start of the meeting, stayed for a bit, left for two hours and returned at the end when we were about to discuss ‘the campaigning part’ with a raft of excuses as to why they couldn’t stay for the whole meeting.

'So what?' you say.

This isn’t a rant about campaigners. I like them. The point is, this is a universal predicament. Campaigners and fundraisers working in isolation.

What I am desperate to do is help organisations develop a ‘true’ measure reflecting the impact of their campaigning/ advocacy efforts. Not measuring outcomes, but real impact.

For example, if an environmental group was lobbying MPs on their green policies, how could that organisation measure the ‘greenness’ of the pollies following their work? Not the number of petitions signed or letters sent, but the change in behaviour as a result of their work.

Creating such a model gives campaigners and fundraisers a reason to work together as both sides have a tangible gauge for their work and we can get on with developing truly integrated activities (minus arguments about whose budget is being used).

I’d love to hear from anyone who has managed to crack this one and developed such a model (so I can rip it off)!

Jonathon Grapsas
28 Oct 2008

I think I may be the eternal optimist on this one Mike. Although I never said it would be easy! But I guess in part my point is simply about true integration and the bringing together of these two teams - which at times, can be painstaking. I'm still keen to hear from others about their experiences measuring both 'outcomes' and 'impact'. Anyone want to share their stories? Cheers, Jonathon

 

Mike Naidu
27 Oct 2008

Blimey Jonathan, you don't want much do you?

Measuring the effectiveness of campaigning to change the law would require taking external influences into account and the intangibility of a case study that sums up the issue, while catching the tide of popular emotion. That's one bad-boy spreadsheet.

Your example highlights the fact that sometimes campaigners don't understand fundraising and as a result don't plan for or take the opportunity to use their donors' support to achieve their goals. Should this anger us fundraisers? Of course not. Do we know everything about effective campaigning?

One way to bridge the gap would be to set the campaigns team targets that the fundraising team could fulfill. Prospecting (two-step street fundraising, call it what you will) offers huge opportunities if the targets are not only based on donors recruited, average gifts and attrition rates, but also on campaigning actions taken. This could lead to campaigns teams engaging and planning alongside the fundraising team. Not everything in the (charity) world can be quantified and modelled but I salute your passion to try.  Mike

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert