Share

What's different over there? Part 2...

What's different over there? Part 2...
Blogs

What's different over there? Part 2... 2

Fundraising | Jonathon Grapsas | 22 Sep 2008

Nothing drives me madder than meeting someone who spends every breathing moment talking about their favourite subject: them. Their favorite type of curry, their views on what’s right and wrong with the world and even their two bob’s worth on Cristiano Ronaldo’s possible transfer. Sometimes the only solution is to excuse ourselves to visit the bathroom in the midst of them gabbling about their son’s upcoming football match.

Actually, if we are really honest many of us have probably been guilty of this ourselves. It’s so obvious when it is happening, so why do so many charity communications talk about us, the organization, rather than you the donor? And more importantly, those we are helping, the beneficiaries.

I’ve spent a lot of time over the past six years analyzing how charities respond to unsolicited approaches from donors through a series of mystery shopping projects, where we as real donors attempt a number of interactions with the charity, including making real donations. 

After all these years, I’m still astounded at the level and breadth of those communications which focus on the bricks and mortar of the charities we try to support rather than on the impact our donations will have. Consider these two pieces of contrasting copy within charity materials. We at the <Insert charity name> are celebrating our 75th anniversary this year and we hope you will come on board with us as we celebrate this momentous occasion in our history.  Versus… I would hope that you can join me in the fight against childhood cancer and to help little boys just like Tommy.

The first is entirely organizationally focused, insular and cares more about birthday cakes and party streamers rather than changing lives. In fact, changing lives or the cause for which they exist, is not clear from this sentence.  Contrast that with the second piece of copy. It is personal (using language such as ‘I’ and ‘you’), uses empowering language and talks about human impact, using a real case study. 

Time and time again, through critiquing hundreds upon thousands of charity communications I constantly feel let down and frustrated. I (as a donor) don’t want to know, nor do I care about anniversaries and parties. I want to know about someone like little Tommy and how I can help make a difference to his life. So whether you’re sitting in Vauxhall or Vancouver, spend ten minutes looking at every communication that leaves your building. You may just be a little surprised at what you find.

Conor Byrne
7 Oct 2008

Basic DM error there....dont write about yourself!

Redina Kolaneci
26 Sep 2008

Yes Jonathon I agree with what you are saying and I have to confess that I find that many of the charities I work with are full of 'we are doing this and that' and not enough of 'you have an opportunity to make a difference' in their communications. In fact I belive the issue is deeper than just being organisationally focused - is holding on to the wrong fundraising paradigm 'we (the organisation) are the heroes who are changing the world' and you (the donor) are just someone who helps us achieve that. ' What's worse I find that most charities seem to make no effort to find out what really matters to their donors and how satisfied they are with how the charity delivers its programmes and services .... However, this will require more than just a brief review of communications - something like a major shift in thinking and practice of fundraising... which in my opinion means focusing less on how to find rich people and get them to give to our charity and more on carefully mapping the values and attitudes of the donors we have and creating what my boss affectionately calls 'donor delight.' Cos' delighted donors are likely to stay around and stay involved for a long time!

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert