Share

Twitter bandwagon overcrowded and under-informed

Twitter bandwagon overcrowded and under-informed
Blogs

Twitter bandwagon overcrowded and under-informed 3

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 23 Jul 2009

I’ve blogged a fair bit about Twitter now. Blogging on a topic should not be mistaken for expertise – or competence in general - however, I believe I have a fair understanding of how Twitter works.

  1. You set up an account.
  2. You sign up to receive critical and informative updates from people and organisations you’re interested in - eg. I just had a great lunch with @X.
  3. You keep your friends, fans and randoms updated with critical and interesting developments in the life of your organisation/self  - eg. Traffic is delayed on the M25 ;(.
  4. (Optional) You become obsessed with points 2 and 3.

Straightforward, methinks. And with Twitter becoming one of the fastest growing destinations on the internet, it is no wonder that charities want to get involved – even if they don’t quite understand the above four tenets of Twitter.

One such charity is an American children’s cancer research centre, St Jude’s. The charity has set up a Twitter account @FundraiseStJude which plans to attract one million followers for no other reason than that when it does have one million followers, it will auction off its account to the highest bidder.

You can’t fault them for ambition. Or quirk - of which I am a fan. But the campaign seems to misunderstand the basic fact that people only follow Twitterers they are interested in seeing updates from. It will take a follower and supporter of St Jude’s all of five seconds to cease following the Twitterer if instead of St Jude’s updates, they start getting offers from Revlon or the like.

One million Twitter followers are absolutely worthless - if the reason of having them is for the sake of having them. They are not loyal, they are not obedient and they are not stupid. As Jon Waddingham pointed out in his blog last week, even Stephen Fry with his 670,000-odd followers cannot get his fans to do much more than pay attention to him.

In the rush to fundraise from Twitter not only has the sector been inundated with seminars, workshops and intensive courses, but clearly some have been blinded by the lights flashing 'NEXT BIG THING'. 

Steve Bridger
29 Jul 2009

Celina - why pick out one example (and I know there are loads more) of Twitter silliness... when there are loads of good stories to tell.

Celina Ribeiro
29 Jul 2009

There are indeed loads of good Twitter stories to tell, and I have told many.

FundraiseStJude is obviously a bad example but one, like bedtime fables, that should be used as a warning to others.

Tally Ho
23 Jul 2009

But what about twestival and Charity:Water?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro

Celina Ribeiro is the editor of Fundraising magazine and daily contributor to CivilSociety.co.uk.

Follow Celina @Celina_Ribeiro_

Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?

7 Feb 2012

Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.

Hold tight - we're moving!

6 Feb 2012

Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.

Time management: execute with excellence

2 Feb 2012

Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...

The sector needs to better support its women, says Rowena Lewis

7 Feb 2012

As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...

Don’t just stand there shouting, say something useful

23 Jan 2012

Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...

Return from Haiti: a new focus on governance

23 Jan 2012

Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...

emailalert