Share

Looking a gift horse in the mouth

Looking a gift horse in the mouth
Blogs

Looking a gift horse in the mouth

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 3 Oct 2008

At what point should a charity ‘just say no’?

At a seminar on ethical challenges for Jewish charities hosted by the Jewish Association for Business Ethics last week, I was struck by the comments of one of the speakers.

Dayan I Berger, an expert in Jewish law, told his audience of Jewish charity representatives that they have an ethical and pragmatic duty to investigate the source of their donations. Indeed, sometimes, to reject them.

Charities, in particular Jewish ones, have a responsibility “not to bring the institution of charity into disrepute by associating with or receiving tainted money,” he said. “It belittles the concept of charity altogether.”

And when a charity is presented with “dubious money”, Berger insists they have a duty to reject it. Accepting the money, even when it would do great good for the charities’ beneficiaries, would “condone wrong-doing”.

But, is working with the devil sometimes a necessary evil? A critical part of a Machiavellian scheme to do as much good as possible?

Surely the answer must, at least sometimes, be yes.

A corporate fundraiser from a wildlife charity told me this week that her charity has built partnerships with companies which, in their past, have been serious environmental vandals. Rather than take the cash and run, the charity submits the corporates to a long vetting process to make sure they are genuinely committed to improving their environmental record before accepting any money and then monitors their activity during the duration of their partnership.

In this case the charity gets the money, the corporate gets the kudos and the environment which was being destroyed by the corporate gets a reprieve.

There must be a point at which a charity cannot forgive and forget; where your memory has to be long and your bank book closed. I don’t want to be putting my hand up for flexible morality, and clearly religious charities have additional ethical considerations, but maybe there are times when it is a good idea to dismount the high horse and think about how much good you can achieve by working with those who perhaps haven’t always been as good as you. 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro

Celina Ribeiro is the editor of Fundraising magazine and daily contributor to CivilSociety.co.uk.

Follow Celina @Celina_Ribeiro_

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

How to resolve your pensions problem

21 May 2012

How do you solve a problem like a pension deficit? David McHattie tackles the issue.

Pursue pension change together

15 May 2012

David Davison mounts his soapbox to call for pensions reform.

Time for charities to get real about going green

24 May 2012

Charities, like businesses should be held to account over their environmental standards, says Katy Wing.

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

emailalert