Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?
7 Feb 2012
Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.
I’m starting to think that the recession is actually good for charities. A decade of growth has left us fat and unfocussed. Now everyone is taking a long hard look at how they use their time and re-rationalising what is effective.
I say everyone, but maybe not at sector level. The sector’s “key umbrella bodies” are using their (our?) time to build a case for the government to change the rules on gift aid. Numerous reports have shown that charities are just not maximising their use of the current gift aid system. The sector response: change the rules so we don’t have to try harder.
The rights or wrongs of this initiative can be argued until the seas run dry, but I can’t help but feel this is a non-starter.
Unemployment is rising leading to falling income tax receipts, people are shopping less therefore VAT returns are dropping, oh and the government has borrowed billions to bail out our banking system. The end results? The coffers are pretty much dry. And we in the charity sector want the government to assume that every donation is valid for gift aid, greatly increasing the burden on the treasury. It just doesn’t add up.
But there are quick wins for charities out there. A quick win that won’t cost the government much at all and will give charities the opportunity to raise more money is to change the rules about Telephone Preference Service. Anyone who signs up to be TPSed is blocked from both commercial and charity cold calling.
According to Hugh at Relationship Marketing, back in the 90’s when the law was being agreed, charities were given the opportunity to lobby for a separate charity communication opt out. This opportunity wasn’t pushed by the sector. Then as now, we do not have a group/body of charities and PFOs dedicated to promoting and ensuring best practise in the world of telephone fundraising. Hmmm.
Will the sector push it this time round? Maybe, but we will have to have a robust debate about the public perception of charities finding loopholes to get around the law. The sector would need to speak with one voice and be proud to tell the public why this change will be so valuable to our beneficiaries. We at the PFRA have been trying to get charities to do this for years and to be honest, have failed. The same faces seem to be willing to stick their head above the parapet to face the slings and arrows of poor journalism.
Without the sectors support, I fear this will be another wild goose chase.
Adam Rothwell
15 Jun 2009
Thanks for your kind comments, Mike. Would you mind answering my points, though? Basically, I'd like to know why you think it's OK to bother people at home who've categorically said they don't want to be bothered? If you could just help me to understand this, I'd be grateful - because it does sound a bit rude to me.
Mike Naidu
15 Jun 2009
You are more than welcome Adam. I have many more "kind comments" where they came from. To answer your point I would need to ask you whether you have actually read the white paper or even my blog thoroughly? I don't advocate cold calling potential supporters and the report proposes three options for amending the current processes.
What both the paper and I have said is that before any change is proposed, the sector should have an open discussion about the pros and cons of changing the laws around TPS and the impact it may have on the perception of fundraising amongst the public. Sound like quite an accountable and transparent process to me.
Mike
Mike Naidu
13 Jun 2009
Not that I want to seem rude Adam (where's that license I was given when I became a fundraiser?), but I can't help but feel proud that you think my attitude stinks!
Your lack of fundraising skill, knowledge or experience, combined with your lack of emotional understanding of why people donate, added to your generally uncharitable attitude kind of sums up what is wrong with people who set themselves up to be a sector watchdog and fail miserably. Please accept my apologies for being passionate about the charity I work for, the charities I support and the sector I believe in.
Mike
Adam Rothwell
12 Jun 2009
Not that I want to seem melodramatic, Mike, but I do think your attitude sums up a lot of what's wrong with the fundraising. People sign up to the TPS because they don't want to be bothered at home. Simple as that. Charities - like everyone else - should respect that decision. Just because charities are worthy doesn't give them a license to be rude.
Julia Hall
10 Jun 2009
I am sick and tired of these charities harrassing me. I donate to my chosen causes. I do my research and make my decision.
I detest being accosted in the street by a desperate jiggling jumping chugger. I am not a rude person but I have just taken to ignoring them so I can enjoy my lunch in peace. Please don't give them access to my phone too so they can ruin my evening.
Mike Naidu
10 Jun 2009
Benita, telephone fundraising good practise is enshrined in an IoF code and unhappy members of the public can complain to the FRSB.
Julia, you could still opt of charity cold calls, or you could choose to receive them under the proposed system. It must be so hard for you to walk past the street fundraisers and ignore them. If you work in London, do you say "no thank you" to every free newspaper distributer or do you ignore them as well? It's a hard life ehh?
Mike
Benita McMahon
9 Jun 2009
Although I loathe cold calling, I am in favour of charities being allowed to do it. The same principles as apply to direct mail, however, should apply to cold calling - no guilt, no pushiness, etcetera. It needs to be done sensitively or we could be seen as being too aggressive.
7 Feb 2012
Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.
6 Feb 2012
Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.
2 Feb 2012
Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...
7 Feb 2012
As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...
23 Jan 2012
Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...
23 Jan 2012
Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...
George Overton
18 Jun 2009
Until charity communications are MILES better, more person centred, and more long term relationship building, than company communications, I also disagree that the MPS and TPS rules should be changed to benefit charities more. Such improvements to charity communications are unlikely in the short term.
[Reply]