Fundraisers must get onto the front foot to avert further PR disasters

Becky Slack

Fundraisers must get onto the front foot to avert further PR disasters

Fundraising | 30 Dec 2015

The controversies of 2015 should not have come as a surprise to fundraisers, says Becky Slack. There’s much that can be done to ensure future critical stories don’t cause as much damage.

What a year 2015 has been for fundraising. From false accusations that direct mail was directly responsible for the suicide of a pensioner, to tabloid journalists going undercover and exposing dodgy fundraising operations, there was a multitude of negative publicity that led to a decrease in donations, a dent in trust and confidence, and the introduction of more draconian (self) regulation.

While some of these stories exposed poor practice, others turned out to be based on flimsy or little evidence, or were simply false. But, shoddy journalism aside, charities do not always help themselves when it comes to responding to negative coverage. All too often they stick their heads in the sand or run for the hills, hoping it will go away. It won’t.

It is disappointing when organisations that are supposed to fight injustice and advocate for others can’t stand up for themselves. When I’ve spoken to charities about why their response to criticism hasn’t been stronger, I’ve been given various different excuses – the favourite one being “we weren’t expecting it”.

This simply doesn’t wash. I’ve been writing about the reputational risks of fundraising for a decade. During this time we’ve had numerous stories on face-to-face, direct mail, telephone fundraising, not to mention admin costs and chief executive salaries. If this latest bout of stories was unexpected then that worries me. Why aren’t fundraisers going through their strategies and assessing aspects of their work that might result in negative coverage? Fundraisers should be identifying vulnerabilities and putting plans in place to help prevent those risks from being realised and to minimise damage if they are.

This fundraising/comms risk management strategy needs to be completed in partnership with the PR team and shared with all relevant internal stakeholders, including the trustee board and fundraising agencies, to ensure that if and when the proverbial does hit the fan then everyone is prepared. This will prevent charities from having to scrabble around trying to figure out what their line is at the last minute, which is what seems to have happened in many of the organisations caught up in this year’s media storms. Indeed, I’d wager that very few Fundraising Magazine readers even know who their PR team is, and fewer have actually sat down and discussed strategy with them.

Others have said that they find it difficult to respond to these stories because journalists only print a line or two from their statements, which doesn’t present the full picture. True, but the story itself is only one way in which charities can respond. Social media, an organisation’s own website, letters to donors – these can also be used to counter negative perceptions.

Yet when looking at the digital tools used by some of the charities implicated in the stories this summer there appears to be little information shared. With the exception of Oxfam, I could find no full, detailed response to allegations of poor fundraising practice; there was limited information available about how these organisations fundraise, their reasons for using particular techniques and agencies; and all in all very little to ease concerned donors who might be wanting to find out more about why their favourite causes have been caught up in controversy. So much for transparency and accountability.

Charities are not immune to scrutiny. If you aren’t willing to stand up and account for the way in which you fundraise then perhaps you shouldn’t be using those techniques. It’s up to you to explain why it is you do what you do. If you don’t or can’t, then don’t be surprised when more stories hit the headlines. 

Becky Slack is the founder and managing director of Slack Communications, and a former editor of Fundraising Magazine


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro (38) Niki May Young (22) Kirsty Weakley (20) Hugh Radojev (17) David Ainsworth (12) Jenna Pudelek (9) Stephen Cotterill (9) Michael Naidu (7) Andrew Chaggar (7) David Philpott (7)
Tobin Aldrich (7) Leon Ward (7) Emily Corfe (7) Tania Mason (5) Lucy Caldicott (5) Alistair McLean (5) Alice Sharman (5) Adrian Beney (4) Reuben Turner (4) Vibeka Mair (3) Alan Gosschalk (3) Joe Saxton (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Jonathon Grapsas (3) Beth Yorath (3) Robert Ashton (3) Lisa Clavering (3) Mark Astarita (2) Richard Radcliffe (2) Andrew Scadding (2) Suzie Who (2) Tod Norman (2) Andrew Purkis (2) Liz Tait (2) Stephen Lee (2) Dan Corry (2) Claire Routley (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Andrew O'Brien (2) Beth Breeze (1) Tony Elischer (1) Derek Humphries (1) Alan Clayton (1) Matthew Bowcock (1) Cathy Pharoah (1) Stephen George (1) Stephen Pidgeon (1) Andy Taylor (1) Martin Farrell (1) Morag Fleming (1) Ian MacQuillin (1) Paul Farthing (1) Ken Burnett (1) Rodney Buse (1) John Low (1) Rowena Lewis (1) Danielle Atkinson (1) Joe Jenkins (1) Mark Flannagan (1) Geetha Rabindrakumar (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Amanda McLean (1) Jason Suckley (1) Imogen Ward (1) Kath Abrahams (1) Peter Lewis (1) Jonathan Last (1) Jenni Cahill (1) Marcelle Speller (1) Nick Aldridge (1) Philip Spedding (1) Tom Latchford (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Lucy Gower (1) Martin Edwards (1) Jeff Brooks (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Dan Thompson (1) Steven George-Hilley (1) Emma-Lynn Houghton (1) Peter Horah (1) Ian Clark (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) George Matafonov (1) Marcus Missen (1) Denise Lillya (1) Jaz Nannar (1) Ali Stunt (1) Robin Fisk (1) Ben Russell (1) Gillian Claugher (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Emma Callagher (1) Angharad McKenzie (1) Raj Rajukumar (1) Dominic Will (1) Eudora Pratt (1)
Less +++ More +++

The Libor process is murky, but it is not the charities who are to blame

20 Sep 2016

The Libor process is worryingly unclear, but we should not be attacking the charities for receiving the...

Love, trust and the teachable moment - a better way?

20 Sep 2016

Three months after politicians were united in paying tribute to Jo Cox, which highlighted the importance...

May daze: when it comes to the charity sector, our new PM is as bland as a cheeseless water biscuit

8 Sep 2016

Ian Allsop is gasping for breath after a tumultuous summer – can Theresa May successfully bore him?...

Society Diary: Is a woman really shacked up with this dead philanthropist?

23 Sep 2016

Our weekly round-up of interesting and outlandish information, collected from the corners of the charity...

Dear Andrew: How do I deal with my board's poor attendance?

22 Sep 2016

In this regular column, Andrew Hind answers readers’ queries about governance issues. This week a trustee...

The regulator: Charities should get on the front foot

22 Sep 2016

Many charities have responded proactively to the recent media storm, and are stronger as a result, says...