I have a question…don't laugh
23 May 2013
Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
Roll up, roll up, for the next act of the fascinating spectacle that is face-to-face fundraising. By Tania Mason.
Face-to-face fundraising walks a tightrope; it always has and it probably always will. As the PFRA’s new CEO, Sally de la Bedoyere, aptly puts it: it has to balance the rights of charities to ask for support with the rights of individuals not to feel unduly pressured into giving away their hard-earned money.
It’s still a relatively young fundraising technique, and it’s had to fight to get a seat at the table – even within the sector itself. Under the leadership of Mick Aldridge, the PFRA built a reputation as something of a pitbull – as one insider said recently, “he only had one mode and that was attack”. But that’s because that was what was needed at the time – the crusade against chugging by the right-wing media had taken hold and the lily-livered fundraising charities, despite cashing in by the bucketload on the street, always found something else to do whenever the Daily Mail or Telegraph journalists came a-calling. It was left to Mick and his team to try to defend the technique – a situation that was a source of constant frustration for him.
But now there is a glimmer of hope that things might be changing. Since the infamous Newsnight debacle
of a couple of years ago, the PFRA has been working hard to convince its members that they do need to step up to the plate when chugging is challenged, and Sally de la Bedoyere is confident that in future, they will. As a former managing director of the Evening Standard, she understands intimately how the media works and that the portrayal of street fundraising is driven by the personal likes and dislikes of editors rather than any dispassionate analysis of the facts. But crucially, she also understands that while the PFRA can work its socks off managing site agreements, improving compliance and generally driving up standards, all of that won’t be nearly as effective as the director of fundraising at a household-name cancer charity standing up on Newsnight and explaining from the heart that that annoying chugger outside Victoria Station has just helped to save the life of six-year-old leukaemia patient Rosie from Ealing.
Sally de la Bedoyere has plenty of relevant experience, clearly relishes a challenge and doesn’t seem the type to suffer fools. She also has a mature, intelligent approach to chuggers: “I’ve never donated to one but I’ve had plenty of conversations with them. Some days I have the time to stop and ask them about their charity, others days I’m too busy and so I smile and say no thanks and walk past. And I think that’s what the public should do too.”
She’s a shrewd operator and after just three weeks in the job she can talk about the often-complex issues as if she’s been there three years. She confidently compartmentalises the challenges raised by Lord Hodgson in his report and has plans in place to address each of them. And she refuses to engage in any public jostling for position with the other fundraising umbrella bodies, while also firmly declaring that she only expects the PFRA’s role to grow.
For avid spectators of this particular tightrope act, it just got even more interesting.
23 May 2013
Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.
20 May 2013
A shifting political atmosphere is putting power in the hands of the inexperienced, warns Robert Ashton.
9 May 2013
Ian Allsop muses on the unattractive political career prospects of a charities minister.
24 May 2013
Every weekend, in town and city centres up and down the country, Street Pastors are offering people care,...
23 May 2013
Niki May Young ponders the importance of being able to ask the silly questions.
20 May 2013
A shifting political atmosphere is putting power in the hands of the inexperienced, warns Robert Ashton.
Corporate Partnerships Survey 2012
from £35.00
BUY NOW
2012 Charity Shops Survey
from £75.00
BUY NOW
Fundraising (with optional website)
from £89.00
BUY NOW
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
27 Nov 2013
Adrian Salmon
29 Aug 2012
Good luck to Sally and her team. They've got a tough job ahead of them, and it's only getting worse. As far as I can see they have the following major issues to overcome:
1) Preventing (or, more accurately, trying to reverse) a tragedy of the commons. There are only so many viable sites for street fundraising, and many charities who want to make use of them. So the monitoring of street fundraisers' conduct in these high-visibility places is crucial.
2) Personalised dislike of the fundraisers themselves. You can't read comments on articles about street fundraising in the press, without the words 'grinning dreadlocked youth', or similar, coming up somewhere in the first half dozen. People don't like the fundraisers first and foremost, it would seem, a) because they're young, b) because they're generally cheerful and c) because they seem to portray a counter culture in their style of dress that still offends social conservatives. See also the criticism directed at the Occupy London protesters, for much the same reason.
3) Accusations of 'parasitism'. Many commenters call street fundraisers 'parasites' and even go so far as to deny that their job has any validity whatsoever in British life. Verbal and physical abuse of them is condoned by many. Basically it would seem people don't like fundraising to have any whiff of professionalism about it at all - by and large we the public seem to prefer fundraising only to be done by well-meaning amateurs, even if this is much less effective.
So, fundraising charities could be much more open and honest about costs. A £70 cost to acquire a donor on the street still compares very favourably to the costs of acquiring donors by mail, but you can't expect the general public to understand this. Any charity that is paying a fee per donor to a street fundraising agency will have to be able to show how this is still a more effective use of their money than asking a volunteer to stand out there with a collecting tin.
Maybe there needs to be a campaign against the verbal and physical harassment of these, mostly young, people in the same way that railway companies and the NHS have had to run campaigns to protect their own staff?
But in the end, I've sadly come to the conclusion that I don't think public attitudes are going to change substantially in the short-term, unless a dramatic and visible change occurs in the way street fundraising campaigns are run. Even if this makes them temporarily, and maybe drastically, less effective.
Unfortunately the British public as a whole doesn't give two hoots about charities raising money effectively, they just don't want to have their preconceptions challenged.
[Reply]