Share

Time for the big players to get real on face-to-face

Time for the big players to get real on face-to-face
Blogs

Time for the big players to get real on face-to-face1

Fundraising | Michael Naidu | 12 Jul 2012

The Institute of Fundraising’s upcoming meeting on face-to-face fundraising is long overdue and the absence of the PFRA may make it a more productive endeavour, says former PFRA chair Michael Naidu.

I read with interest that the Institute of Fundraising is planning to hold a fundraising directors-only meeting about the current state of face-to-face fundraising. As the former chair of the PFRA and a long-time advocate of face-to-face fundraising, I wholeheartedly support this plan and urge the directors of fundraising who invest heavily in the medium to participate and be honest and open (in a closed environment of course) about their current activity and future plans.

It is a shame that the Institute has waited so long to call such a meeting. Back in August 2010, Newsnight ran a feature on face-to-face fundraising which focused heavily on the payment of fundraisers and outsourcing to agencies. The response from the fundraising sector was a deafening silence and the task of justifying face-to-face fundraising was done by  a non-fundraising representative from the British Heart Foundation, Betty McBride, director of communications, who stepped up to face Jeremy Paxman’s aggressive and misguided questioning.

This failure of the big charity consumers of face-to-face to be open and transparent has been going on for years (with a few exceptions, notably Alan Gosschalk, advocate of face-to-face and founder of ImpACT) and has had a detrimental effect on both the public image of face-to-face fundraising and the long-term results achieved by charities. The public by and large still believe that charities should be run by volunteers and many potentially brilliant fundraisers are turned off the idea of representing charities on the street and doorstep because of the misinformation prevalent. Not to mention those that stop fundraising because they are physically and mentally abused by the public on a daily basis. Who would be a chugger eh? Well hopefully loads of people because demand for sign-ups is ever-increasing.

Face-to-face is demand-led

And we should remember that face-to-face fundraising, like direct mail, telephone etc, is demand-led. There would be no “evil agencies” if charities did not demand donors and there would be much less poor practice if charities recognised their responsibilities. I am constantly shocked (but no longer surprised) when I hear stories about the arms-length attitude of many charities. Little thought, planning or budget is given to training (and retraining) of fundraisers and the materials and the “ask” are rarely engaging or interesting. Many charities continue to delegate too much responsibility agencies. To draw a comparison, how many charities would allow an agency to develop a DM pack, write the copy, pick the images, segment the data and send out the pack without any input from the charity? Very few I hope, but this happens all the time with face-to-face fundraising.

So do the PFRA and the FRSB need to be present at the meeting? I don’t think this is necessary and those attending may feel more comfortable to be honest about their current activity if the regulatory bodies are not in the room. But it would be useful for everyone if Peter Lewis, chief executive of the Institute of Fundraising, would give some clarity about what the aims and objectives of the meeting are and share the outcomes and action points with the sector after the meeting.

The meeting is due to take place shortly after Lord Hodgson reports back his findings and plans around the public collections regime as part of the Charities Act review and I suspect he will be expecting collaborative, sector-wide solutions to issues with public fundraising. These solutions cannot be developed by an exclusive groups of fundraising directors behind closed doors and will require charities to be more accountable and transparent about their fundraising, something we talk a lot about but rarely do.

 

Mike Smith
12 Jul 2012

I find it incredible that the charities sector is debating an issue of openness and honesty within charity fundraising when charity should be completely transparent in order to maintain the trust of the people. And why is The Institute of Fundraising’s having a meeting on face-to-face fundraising behind closed doors? Has this shady industry got something to hide?

Also the Newsnight article on chuggers which was broadcast on 28th August 2010 was not presented by Jeremy Paxman it was presented by Gavis Esler and he was by no means aggressive, he gave Betty McBride an easy time and this report can be seen on Youtube. Incidentally Betty McBride made a very poor defense of chugger, avoided many of the questions *** further text removed for breach of community standards***

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Michael Naidu

Michael Naidu is a fundraising consultant and former chair of the PFRA.

Celina Ribeiro (80) Niki May Young (34) Jonathon Grapsas (30) Michael Naidu (23) Adrian Beney (20) Andrew Scadding (20) Andrew Chaggar (17) Jonathan Waddingham (15) Suzie Who (15) Vibeka Mair (14)
Kirsty Weakley (14) David Philpott (13) Tania Mason (11) Daniel Fletcher (9) David Burrows (8) Alistair McLean (7) Robert Ashton (7) Gareth Jones (6) Beth Yorath (6) Rowena Lewis (5) Tom Eeles (5) Mark Astarita (4) Stephen Pidgeon (4) Tod Norman (4) Nick Cater (4) Alan Gosschalk (3) Tony Elischer (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Rob Dyson (3) Ingrid Marson (3) Adam Rothwell (2) Beth Breeze (2) Richard Radcliffe (2) Matthew Bowcock (2) Joe Saxton (2) Reuben Turner (2) Tris Lumley (2) John Tate (2) Garreth Spillane (2) Gordon Hunter (2) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (2) Allan Freeman (2) Lisa Clavering (2) Lindsay Boswell (1) Victoria Cook (1) David Davison (1) Bill Lewis (1) Giles Pegram (1) Jo Swinhoe (1) Derek Humphries (1) Cathy Pharoah (1) Pauline Broomhead (1) Gordon Michie (1) Chris Ingram (1) Martin Farrell (1) Matt Goody (1) Ian MacQuillin (1) Jackie Mendoza (1) Max Du Bois (1) Alan Hawkes (1) Ken Burnett (1) Ian Allsop (1) Martin Brookes (1) Tesse Akpeki (1) Anne Moynihan (1) Sara Llewellin (1) Rupert Tappin (1) Julia Unwin (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Scott Gray (1) Stephen Hammersley (1) Keith Collins (1) Liz Tait (1) Peter O'Hara (1) Debbie Attwood (1) Joanna Motion (1) Paul Marvell (1) Amanda McLean (1) Jason Suckley (1) Paul Amadi (1) Imogen Ward (1) June O'Sullivan (1) Kath Abrahams (1) Dan Corry (1) Douglas Rouse (1) Belinda Pratten (1) Jonathan Last (1) Paul Emery (1) Marcelle Speller (1) Nick Aldridge (1) Philip Spedding (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Jeff Brooks (1) Vicki Prout (1) Dan Thompson (1) Claire Routley (1) Steven George-Hilley (1) Emma-Lynn Houghton (1) Peter Horah (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) George Matafonov (1)
Less +++ More +++

When ignorance is far from bliss

20 May 2013

A shifting political atmosphere is putting power in the hands of the inexperienced, warns Robert Ashton.

Pointless ministers?

9 May 2013

Ian Allsop muses on the unattractive political career prospects of a charities minister.

Tablets: the end of an era?

9 May 2013

John Tate asks whether the inexorable rise of the tablet will spell the end for the humble PC.

When ignorance is far from bliss

20 May 2013

A shifting political atmosphere is putting power in the hands of the inexperienced, warns Robert Ashton.

Pointless ministers?

9 May 2013

Ian Allsop muses on the unattractive political career prospects of a charities minister.

App-solutely challenging

9 May 2013

As one of a team of eight corporate graduate volunteers partnered with a small charity to develop a mobile...

Free eNews