Share

Cash rules, OK?

Cash rules, OK?
Opinion

Cash rules, OK?

Fundraising | Tony Elischer | 13 Jul 2009

Our European neighbours appear to be doing well with cash giving. Tony Elischer asks if we should be seeing it in a new light and give donors more options during the recession

No one needs to tell you that the pressure is now on. And it’s clear that everyone has heard the message about taking more time to track things, more regularly, using as much analysis as possible to understand what is really happening. The challenge is: what do you do with the answers? And, more importantly, do you have the knowledge, the skills, the ideas  and the resources to make the appropriate response?

In difficult times we need a wider view of the world and to draw on skills we may not have used for a while. Over the last 15 years we have seen unprecedented learning, refinement and results from regular and committed giving programmes.

Strategically, most organisations have set ambitious growth targets against regular and committed giving and these are at the heart  of their ability to grow support from individuals.

Most charities have quickly moved to address the Stewardship of their existing donors and so do their best to prevent or halt attrition. But the key crisis that is now dawning is the real inability to persuade new donors to support the charity on a committed basis through an automated payment; who wants to add another direct debit to their account when consumers are managing more cautiously, not knowing what is around the corner?

Re-thinking what recruitment means

We keep talking generally about how difficult recruitment is but we need to be specific about the fact that it is recruitment of new regular or committed givers that is drying up. Many charities are still blindly holding onto budgets set months ago believing that they can hit projections, perhaps with small adjustments, but a more realistic view may be of more help to the charity in the medium term.

So what are the alternatives? Sure, there is no miracle cure but from several charities I have spoken to, both large and small, there appears to be an increase in cash giving – even when approached for a regular gift people are responding with a single cash gift.

Allow for one-off gifts

Direct marketers in our sector are trained to focus on regular and committed giving at  all costs and until recently shunned the very thought of proactively targeting cash gifts, unless in emergencies. Our materials and propositions make it more and more difficult for a donor to respond with a single gift, in some cases almost to the exclusion of a one-off gift response!

I wonder whether we have lost the art of soliciting cash gifts and thinking strategically about how these can be repeated by the same donor in a short time frame, keeping the donor in control and still firmly connected to our charity.

Looking at other countries, many have struggled to understand our growth and focus on regular giving, simply because their banking systems have been slow to provide the opportunity for automated payment. Often they have a firm grip on cash asking and making sure that ‘one-off’ gifts become regular gifts, but simply not on an automated basis. Yes, you have to work harder and, yes, you have to watch the RoI, but now is the time to re-engage our skills and thinking in this area. I am yet to see any thorough data, but anecdotally cash recruitment is holding up and doing well in other European countries.

In an unpredictable market you need to listen to the market. I believe it is telling us that it is still committed to charities as part of life and budgets, but it wants more control at a difficult point in time. Now we should be driving that little bit harder to put 75 per cent  of our energy into existing  donors, looking at possible cash programmes for recruitment, keeping our regular and committed programmes fresh for when the market recovers and above all continually testing, learning and looking.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Should you be saying no to your FRS17 pension report?

7 Feb 2012

Yes and no are not the only options available when it comes to FRS17 pension reports, says David Davison.

Hold tight - we're moving!

6 Feb 2012

Robert Ashton outlines the benefits of investing in community development finance institutions.

Time management: execute with excellence

2 Feb 2012

Allocating time appropriately between strategy and operations is, says John Tate, the key to business...

The sector needs to better support its women, says Rowena Lewis

7 Feb 2012

As the sector dedicated to social justice, why are charities not making better progress at smashing the...

Don’t just stand there shouting, say something useful

23 Jan 2012

Opposing the status quo is all well and good, says Robert Ashton, but much more effective if you can propose...

Return from Haiti: a new focus on governance

23 Jan 2012

Back from serving in Haiti after the devastating 2010 earthquake, Andrew Chaggar's mind is focused on...

emailalert