Share

Bus stops that read your face? Plan UK takes a risk

Bus stops that read your face? Plan UK takes a risk
Blogs

Bus stops that read your face? Plan UK takes a risk 2

Fundraising | Celina Ribeiro | 21 Feb 2012

Plan UK is trailblazing facial recognition in a new bus stop advert for its 'Because I’m a Girl' campaign. Celina Ribeiro applauds a charity on the bleeding edge.


Plan UK deserves a slow clap, asymmetrical smile and prolonged rise to a standing ovation for a campaign that could be a total fizzer.

That trifecta of admiration is demanded by its launch, tomorrow, of . That is, a working bus stop parked outside Selfridges on Oxford Street in London which will use facial recognition software to determine whether its viewer is male or female, and then tailor its message accordingly as part of its ‘Because I am a Girl’ campaign. Male viewers will have their content restricted, highlighting the fact that women and girls around the world routinely have their choices restricted as a result of their gender. Female viewers will be able to watch a 40-second advert, complete with sound and touch screen technology.

This is bold stuff. A first for any kind of advertiser in the UK and hopefully the last time elements of a Tom Cruise movie (Minority Report) become reality.

This multi-sensory, interactive, time-and-place sensitive advertising is as exciting to an advertiser as it is novel and, after a few seconds thought, kinda creepy to consumers.

Good on Plan UK. This isn’t the first time they’ve tried to bring 'Because I’m a girl' right into people’s faces as it were. Late last year they launched a Facebook app which transposed the viewers Facebook history into an experience which compared their lives to that of girls born in less equal and wealthy parts of the world. This kind of behaviour - experimental, fleet of foot, innovative, risk-taking, engaging with technology - is so much against the often too-safe campaigning tactics of larger charities, that I just have to love it.

The 'Because I’m A Girl' campaign is aiming to raise £40m by June 2016 and the ‘Choices for Girls’ awareness drive of the campaign, of which this interactive advert is a part, aims to raise £250,000 over its four-month lifespan. The bus stop ad will ask viewers to text a £3 donation or they can scan a QR code. Plan UK has funded the experiment bus stop ad itself, which is a brave thing to do.

Shock horror – it’s not a sure bet!

Brave, particularly, because there are things that could go wrong.

Firstly - You read my face! For me, reading my face comes just ever so slightly close to reading my mind. Physically close. I mean my face is just a couple centimetres from my brain, man! But a Plan UK spokeswoman assures me that because the ad is ‘opt-in’ – viewers are told to stand in a certain place if they want their features scanned – there are no real privacy issues at play.

And what if it guesses wrong? A female, often dishevelled, friend of mine briefly worked the till at a supermarket while at university. On a couple of occasions the lanky young woman was appalled to hear diligent parents scold their children to ‘say thank you to the nice young man’. Remembering her mortification, I can assure you getting a woman’s gender wrong is no way to make friends. (Apparently the technology guesses right nine times out of ten).

 

Plan UK Oxford St interactive bus advert



Yes, there is a potential creep-out factor. However consumers – although we whine - are increasingly familiar with advertising that is getting increasingly familiar with us as individuals. The question over the next five years is going to be: how much intrusion will we, the public, swallow?

But, if it proves that people will be amused and comfortable with this kind of technology, perhaps sometime in the all too near future a bus stop advertisement may well be able to read whether I am happy. Or sad. Or indeed if I have an armful of shopping bags. I imagine a 1984-style voice looming over me as I wait for the Number 91 asking whether I really did need another pair of jeans, and had I thought about allocating just a fraction of my wardrobe budget towards workers rights in the developing world’s denim manufacturing heartland.

Clearly, Plan UK’s courage helps to pave the way of those behind the immersive advert – Clear Channel, 2D Exposure and CURB Media – to test a technology with a warm fuzzy sell (who could get angry at helping women in the developing world?), before using it to flog us sneakers,  perfume, cars and – worse yet – politics. They can test the technology, public receptiveness using the warm glow of charity before hitting us up with all-consuming consumerism.

Do I care? Well, yes, a bit. But mostly it’s just pretty exciting to see a charity really push the boat out. Don’t ya think?

 
Plan UK Oxford St bus advert

 

Stephen Pidgeon
22 Feb 2012

Brilliant, great article Celina and well done to Plan

Alison
Fundraising Manager
22 Feb 2012

Looks fascinating though I must confess I'm a little uneasy with the thought of what this type of gimmick will cost a cahrity and will the donor wonder what their money is being spent on?
Wold be interesting to see the reasoning behind the spend.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Celina Ribeiro

Celina Ribeiro is the commissioning editor of Fundraising Magazine and contributor to Civil Society News.

Follow Celina @Celina_Ribeiro_

Celina Ribeiro (38) Niki May Young (22) Kirsty Weakley (19) Hugh Radojev (12) David Ainsworth (11) Jenna Pudelek (9) Stephen Cotterill (9) Michael Naidu (7) Andrew Chaggar (7) David Philpott (7)
Tobin Aldrich (7) Leon Ward (7) Emily Corfe (7) Tania Mason (5) Lucy Caldicott (5) Alistair McLean (5) Alice Sharman (5) Adrian Beney (4) Reuben Turner (4) Vibeka Mair (3) Alan Gosschalk (3) Joe Saxton (3) Pauline Broomhead (3) Jonathon Grapsas (3) Beth Yorath (3) Robert Ashton (3) Lisa Clavering (3) Richard Radcliffe (2) Andrew Scadding (2) Suzie Who (2) Tod Norman (2) Liz Tait (2) Stephen Lee (2) Dan Corry (2) Claire Routley (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Andrew O'Brien (2) Mark Astarita (1) Beth Breeze (1) Tony Elischer (1) Derek Humphries (1) Alan Clayton (1) Matthew Bowcock (1) Cathy Pharoah (1) Stephen George (1) Stephen Pidgeon (1) Andy Taylor (1) Martin Farrell (1) Morag Fleming (1) Ian MacQuillin (1) Paul Farthing (1) Ken Burnett (1) Rodney Buse (1) John Low (1) Rowena Lewis (1) Danielle Atkinson (1) Joe Jenkins (1) Mark Flannagan (1) Geetha Rabindrakumar (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Amanda McLean (1) Jason Suckley (1) Imogen Ward (1) Kath Abrahams (1) Peter Lewis (1) Jonathan Last (1) Jenni Cahill (1) Marcelle Speller (1) Nick Aldridge (1) Philip Spedding (1) Tom Latchford (1) Sir David Varney (1) Liam Barrington-Bush (1) Lucy Gower (1) Martin Edwards (1) Jeff Brooks (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Dan Thompson (1) Steven George-Hilley (1) Emma-Lynn Houghton (1) Peter Horah (1) Ian Clark (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) George Matafonov (1) Marcus Missen (1) Denise Lillya (1) Jaz Nannar (1) Ali Stunt (1) Robin Fisk (1) Ben Russell (1) Gillian Claugher (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Emma Callagher (1) Angharad McKenzie (1) Raj Rajukumar (1) Eudora Pratt (1)
Less +++ More +++

Swimming against the tide: England's fastest growing charities 2009-2013

4 May 2016

As part of his dissertation, Olof Williamson identified 101 charities to have spiked and then sustained...

Panama chat: musings on charity finance from another continent

4 May 2016

Ian Allsop has recently returned from Costa Rica, but he definitely does not use any offshore investment...

People not processes

4 May 2016

Robina Chatham reflects on how she lost sight of the importance of people skills.

Society Diary: A minister spurned, a castle and a hard place and charity naming rights

29 Apr 2016

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

Shawcross embraces charitable advocacy – three years late

27 Apr 2016

Andrew Purkis examines William Shawcross' statements on campaigning, and says the Commission needs to...

The problem with the Charity Commission's governance

26 Apr 2016

Kirsty Weakley argues that serious thought must be given to any reappointments or recruitments to the...