Computing the past

Computing the past

Computing the past

IT | John Tate | 4 Jul 2011

John Tate takes a look back to see what the future of computer technology may hold.

I have been doing some overseas travel this year and am currently sitting in a hotel in Seattle writing this column. Seattle is the home of Microsoft – hence my visit. I am sitting within a few miles of where Bill Gates (the founder of Microsoft) was born. During my time here I’ll learn about the latest and greatest from the Microsoft developers and be pondering on where they will go in the next few decades.

Microsoft was founded in 1975. By contrast, in 2011 IBM is celebrating its 100th year in business and its review of a century of activities makes interesting reading.

IBM has successfully re-invented itself over the decades. While many of us know IBM for its hardware, it is now in fact the world’s largest business and technology-services provider with over 190,000 staff in this division of their company.

Over the years there have been many great ideas from IBM. However, several of these were picked up by other vendors who subsequently gained the lion’s share of the market. For example, Microsoft took over the dominant position with PC operating systems and office productivity applications, although IBM was an earlier player in these markets. It is well known in the IT industry that the first organisation to market with a new product often gets overtaken by the second, or third wave of alternatives from other vendors.

This can seem unfair on the organisation that came up with version one of a new technology as they are likely to have invested significantly in the R&D for the new product, and to have created early customer demand. However, in the case of large organisations they have often benefited from a quasi-monopoly for their earlier products and reaped a huge return on this investment. For instance, IBM dominated the mainframe market for decades and enjoyed gross profit margins on product lines of over 60 per cent – producing billions of dollars of profits.

Other corporate giants have enjoyed similar success with market dominance: Oracle with its database software, SAP with its ERP application and, closer to home, BT with its historic dominance of the UK telecoms market.

In terms of defining technologies, the mainframe brought computing into the corporate space and the subsequent mini-computers, and then PCs, brought computing power to the masses. Office productivity suites changed the working lives of accountants – where spreadsheets and word processing replaced the need for large amounts of manual work. Step forward to the last decade or so and, from a technology perspective, it is the internet that is creating the most change to our working lives.

All the giants are at play with internet technology, and there are sub-sets of market growth in a range of areas. Cloud computing is trying to get us to run our applications on central servers – some would argue taking us back to the days of mainframe computing. Social media is offering new ways to communicate with others – think Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. Google still dominates internet search technology but continues to come under threat from many new players, as well as the likes of Microsoft. Apple has taken a dominant market position with mobile devices including the iPad and iPhone.

So where will Microsoft go next, particularly with internet-based technology? It is trying to gain a strong position in most of the above areas with a huge push on its cloud offering. It is buying Skype to develop its presence in social networking and continues to push Bing as an alternative to Google. It has a mobile-phone offering which it is pushing hard and a tablet computer which is competing with Apple. Quite a handful of products/markets to compete in.

For the next five years at least I see Microsoft holding a strong position in its core products – ie operating systems and Microsoft Office. I suspect, like IBM, it will look very different in a longer timeframe. However it does have one advantage. It is not at the forefront of developing new web-based solutions and, if it gets its act together, there is a chance it could piggy-back off some of the ideas created by others and bring out second or third-generation products that win market dominance.

A number of IT analysts are predicting gloom and doom for Microsoft longer-term, as newer entrants to the market put the company under pressure. However, I think it is too early to write it off. Like IBM, Microsoft is likely to still be in business in 65 years, but what it looks like then will be very different from today. 

John Tate is MD of ChangeBASE, IT adviser to the CFDG and a visiting lecturer at Cass Business School



[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

Government can't ask charities to compete for contracts while savaging council spending

15 Jun 2015

The government cannot tell charities they must compete for contracts in a market while slashing the spending...

'Northern Powerhouse'? Almost as clearly defined as the big society

4 Jun 2015

Ian Allsop talks tomatoes and why charities should look north for income growth opportunities under the...

Responsibility for good practice lies with trustees, not with fundraising professionals

30 Jun 2015

Isn't it the role of trustees to be the guardian of values, asks Rodney Buse, chair of the commission...

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

'Frugging' undermines genuine research and harms the sector

10 Jun 2015

Is frugging the new chugging? Jane Frost rails against the practice of fundraising under the guise of...

eNews sign-up