Investors' dividends caught up in the BP slick

Investors' dividends caught up in the BP slick

Investors' dividends caught up in the BP slick

Finance | 30 Jun 2010

The fallout from the BP oil disaster has had serious consequences for charity investors, says Lynne Lamont.

Few UK charity investment portfolios will be without exposure to global energy giant BP, and investment managers and charity trustees alike have been following the media and political frenzy following the catastrophic explosion on the Deepwater platform. Aside from the uncertainty over the potential outcome of the spill in terms of capping the flow, compensating those impacted and dealing with the environmental consequences, the share price has been plunging and it has been announced that no dividends are to be paid to investors for the remainder of 2010.

The dividend income from such stocks is particularly important to charity investors for whom the main priorities are generally to maintain the real value of the capital over the long term whilst also generating income. Traditionally, many charitable funds were set up as permanet endowments restricted to spending only income by their governing documents, whilst others believe that it is prudent for the longevity of their trust to operate in this manner.

Historically, it has not been hard to generate reasonable income streams as cash rates and government bonds, perceived as low-risk assets, have been significantly higher. Today with interest rates at 0.5 per cent and the Uk government bond yield at 3.5 per cent, the outlook is bleak for income investors, particularly with inflation (CPI) sitting at 3.4 per cent. With the loss of the tax relief on Uk dividends, cuts in external funding and pressures on fundraising, charity investors are frantically attempting to maintain the income levels to which The fallout from the BP oil disaster has had serious consequences for charity investors, says Lynne Lamont. They have become accustomed and reliant upon. the average yield on the UK FTSE all share index is currently 3.5 per cent. Within this however, a small number of companies are paying yields in excess of 5-6 per cent, which together with the opportunity for real capital growth has enticed income-hungry investors.

The recent financial crisis has highlighted this with the downfall of UK financial stalwarts such as Royal Bank of scotland and Lloyds. The demise of these popular, highyielding equities hit charity investors hard in terms of loss of capital and suspension of dividends. This was disastrous for those within charities trying to manage cashflows where there were demanding income targets. This also further emphasised a situation where a handful of companies were paying a large proportion of the overall available income. BP is one such company as £1 in every £6 paid in dividends last year came from BP.

In the current low-interest-rate environment, the desire to generate income has led to charities being enticed into an increasingly smaller range of equities in order to achieve demanding income targets which may lead to an increased level of stockspecific risk. The extreme importance of taking professional advice and having a well diversified portfolio has never been more pressing, in terms of the type or the range of asset types held and the geographic spread of the underlying holdings. The inclusion of investments such as overseas equities, corporate bonds, property and infrastructure funds allow for necessary diversification of income streams. Other investments such as absolute return funds, hedge funds and gold regrettably pay little income and thus it is difficult to justify their inclusion where the generation of income is a priority.

In an attempt to ensure greater diversification, many charities have taken the move to adopt a total return approach where the income generated within the fund can be supplemented with capital gains in times of plenty. This can certainly help to lower overall risk through allowing for a wider range of assets to be held but would require collaboration with the regulator or a lawyer to effect the change.

So what of BP, the share price and the likelihood of future dividend payments? Political pressure has resulted in BP agreeing to pay $20bn into an Independent Claims Facility to cover the cost of all claims associated with the oil spill.

In order to assist the financing of this, the company has announced that no dividend will be paid in 2010. This is bad news for charity investors. Income estimates from investment portfolios form the basis of cash flow forecasts and spending plans for many organisations and there is no easy answer to replacing the lost dividend. The extreme fall in share price is hard to justify and to sell now is to give up on the potential for the capital value of holdings to recover. As the oil continues to flow from the leaking well, charities across the country are left counting the cost of yet another blow to their income 

Lynne Lamont is head of charities in Scotland & Northern Ireland at Brewin Dolphin 




[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

Government can't ask charities to compete for contracts while savaging council spending

15 Jun 2015

The government cannot tell charities they must compete for contracts in a market while slashing the spending...

'Northern Powerhouse'? Almost as clearly defined as the big society

4 Jun 2015

Ian Allsop talks tomatoes and why charities should look north for income growth opportunities under the...

Responsibility for good practice lies with trustees, not with fundraising professionals

30 Jun 2015

Isn't it the role of trustees to be the guardian of values, asks Rodney Buse, chair of the commission...

The long and unhappy saga of the Local Sustainability Fund

29 Jun 2015

Last week the government announced a £20m pot of funding for charities. This sounds like good news, says...

'Frugging' undermines genuine research and harms the sector

10 Jun 2015

Is frugging the new chugging? Jane Frost rails against the practice of fundraising under the guise of...

eNews sign-up